Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Passionate but rational Mizzou friend of mine, married to an IU grad, told me that the IU loss was more about Mizzou playing historically bad football. Still, it is a boost of credibility for IU and would enhance the value of a NT win.

Should be a great game next week!

GMG

  • Upvote 2
Posted

The Mizzou game took a lot out of Indiana. They even lost a couple of key backups.

Well, at least they beat a ranked team. I'm sorry to hear about the injuries, though. Overall, I expect Indiana football to continue on an upward trajectory under Kevin Wilson. After their next game.

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

Indiana will be a tough game for us. Church it up however you will, I think we lose by 14.

James!

I tried to send you a PM, but kept getting a message stating you weren't allowed to use the PM system.

Edited by Got5onIt
Posted

Could be where Ivery and Wilson make a difference as well. If we try to feed Pegram too much we are playing into their strength. If we feed a couple quicker backs and make them run mixed in with some quick throws to quick wideouts we have a legit shot of winning.

  • Downvote 2
Posted

Ivery's Hudle reel is ridiculous. I'm just wondering aloud, for anyone that's seen, how his football speed holds up compared to some of our faster players.

I honestly thought he would be getting more touches right now, but have been pleasantly surprised for the emergence of Wilson.

Posted

Could be where Ivery and Wilson make a difference as well. If we try to feed Pegram too much we are playing into their strength. If we feed a couple quicker backs and make them run mixed in with some quick throws to quick wideouts we have a legit shot of winning.

I like the(true) freshmen, but I would like to see what Evans can do considering he has done well in his opportunities and is probably the fastest guy on the team. Just a few shots in space.

Posted

Or Evans. We can't try to run at them every time we run. They are big and slow and we need to try and run around them with our smaller faster backs. Their run D has been good all year against everyone they have played. If you look back at their games most teams tried running right at them. Mizzou spread them out and ran inside zone plays and finally popped a 50 yarder for a td. Bowling Green, Mizzou, and Maryland had a ton of success throwing it on them. We need to run east and west and look for cut backs and throw the football horizontally and take timely shots vertically. Tire them out and then insert Pegram and run right at them. Just my opinion for it's worth nothing at all.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 11

      Should we add Texas State to the AAC?

    2. 5

      Who did better? PAC 12 or Mountain West?

    3. 26

      Transfer Portal Hits pre First Responder Bowl

    4. 5

      Who did better? PAC 12 or Mountain West?

    5. 3

      Mean Green Travel to Tulane for Midweek Matchup

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,508
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined
  • Most Points

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      140,073
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      132,770
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      126,520
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      109,619
  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,592,647
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,487,749
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      843,227
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      671,592
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
    7. 7
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      467,039
    8. 8
    9. 9
    10. 10
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.