I think the voters slobbered over his bowl win and MVP trophy. All amplified by how piss-poor our bowl history is. Just, in general, a historic season for our program relative to what have in our books.
I think his longevity looked great, and they can celebrate it, but it wasn't the catalyst or sealed the deal.
You bring up an interesting twist: I wouldn't be surprised if they frowned on athletes that transfer out/leave, and don't graduate. I don't know off the top of my head how that factors into current HOF members. Maybe you're onto something there.
what an awkward coincidence.
I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall when there was a meeting, and someone said "Yes, that's what we want to do!"
This is all frustrating and all, but I don't think there is any NCAA deadline that they have failed to meet. Not sure what you mean by "competitive" level, other than comparing this to the time table that our peers met.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.