Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Absolutely, who knows there could be other factors that combined with playing time are contributing to this. Maybe he wants to be closer to home? Getting caught up in numbers at a place like K-State is no crime. This kid can play or he wouldn't be at K-State. I welcome him and his family with open arms.

Posted

I don't know why with almost every OL prospect we ask if he can be converted to a DT. Stop. Just stop.

Well, tgd subject of playing DT was brought up by a K State website, not us.

Posted

Well, tgd subject of playing DT was brought up by a K State website, not us.

No, it's not just this prospect. It's almost very single possible Juco and transfer someone asks that question. If a kid is a O linemen the first 2 years the chances of them changing to DT are about 1%. They are two completely different positions and skill sets.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

I understand completely. My comment was about this prospect and who brought it up. Either way, nice film, hope he ends up here. Having inroads to Cedar Hill would be nice.

Posted

If this kid was playing offensive tackle then that's pretty out of position. He's only 6'1". But at least he did play some as a redshirt freshman.

The only thing I don't like about taking in these transfers is that they take up a spot in the signing class cap of 25. If they just counted towards the 85 limit, it wouldn't be that big a risk. If they don't turn out to be worth a scholarship, then it's a shame not just because they didn't work out, but because you had to miss out on a potentially good high school kid just because a transfer was coming from a big-name school.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

Of all positions, I don't think Mac's gonna bring in an offensive lineman unless he thinks there is some serious potential.

I understand, but I am EXTREMELY leery of transfers that never saw the field at their 1st school. A certain 4 star from Arkansas comes to mind.

Not knocking that guy, but the expectations were sky high when he came here, and he never saw the field.

But he provided depth. Which is why I look at this as strictly a depth move. Hopefully I am proven wrong.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted

I understand, but I am EXTREMELY leery of transfers that never saw the field at their 1st school. A certain 4 star from Arkansas comes to mind.

Not knocking that guy, but the expectations were sky high when he came here, and he never saw the field.

But he provided depth. Which is why I look at this as strictly a depth move. Hopefully I am proven wrong.

But he did see the field(very little) as a RS Freshman

Posted

But he did see the field(very little) as a RS Freshman

Don't get me wrong. Depth is needed, especially depth that can give you good reps when starters go down. I just wouldn't put much more emphasis on this than that.

Hope I'm wrong.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.