Jump to content

Updated GMG.com Top 20 Reputation Standings 6.20.14


Harry

Recommended Posts

He was talking about list credibility, not poster credibility. Thus suggesting that maybe the upvote/downvote thing is not the best measure of who contributes the most to this board.

That was the point. Just because someone posts good info or makes good points does not mean that they will be on this list. The only way I can see to actually measure that is to have a group make that ranking.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote for a rating per post ratio. Better indication of the quality (of lack thereof) of a poster.

I hear you but the other side is do we enhance ones reputation for someone posting once in a couple of years over someone who is out there putting themselves to be critiqued on a daily basis? Participation has to be a factor, not the factor but one of the factors considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.