Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Seems to me this "local" school ain't doing too bad in the the area of recruiting:

(from BillySee58's research last week)

"We have 9 current commits who are rated 3-stars by at least one of the four major recruiting websites. Our 3-star commits and what services have them rated as a 3-star:

Branding Garner (ESPN)

Connor Means (ESPN)

Andrew Jones (ESPN)

Trevor Moore (ESPN)

Jalen Adams (ESPN)

Willy Ivery (Scout & Rivals)

Tee Goree (Scout, Rivals and 247

Caleb Chumley (Rivals, 247 & ESPN)

As for "almost" 3 star ratings:

O'Keeron Rutherford has a grade of a 78 on 247 (80 is a 3 star, 70-79 is a 2 star)

Shaq Jackson is a 5.4 on Rivals (need a 5.5 for a 3 star

Josh Greer was just rated a 5.4 on Rivals as well

Also, a few of our 3-stars are very close to being 3 stars on at least one more website.

Fonzale is a 5.4 on Rivals

Garner is a 5.4 on Rivals

Jalen Adams is a 5.4 on Rivals

Andrew Jones is a 78 on 247

Brandon Garner is a 78 on 247

Connor Means is a 78 on 247

Willy Ivery is a 79 on 247

Another reason we shouldn't always put too much stock into stars (I use

offer lists and film ahead of stars) is a guy like Chris Miles, the Flower

Mound offensive lineman. Look at this offer list: This is easily a 3 star

offer list yet he is a 2-star? Very excited to have him and I couldn't

care less that he is not a 3 star. Very valuable commit and smart kid

who will do well on the field and in the classroom."

________________________________

Thanks for your research, BillySee58! :goodjob:

GMG!

PS: Did I leave a name off the 3-star list because I think you said "9" 3 stars in your original research.

Edited by PlummMeanGreen
Posted

Seems to me this "local" school ain't doing too bad in the the area of recruiting:

(from BillySee58's research last week)

"We have 9 current commits who are rated 3-stars by at least one of the four major recruiting websites. Our 3-star commits and what services have them rated as a 3-star:

Branding Garner (ESPN)

Connor Means (ESPN)

Andrew Jones (ESPN)

Trevor Moore (ESPN)

Jalen Adams (ESPN)

Willy Ivery (Scout & Rivals)

Tee Goree (Scout, Rivals and 247

Caleb Chumley (Rivals, 247 & ESPN)

As for "almost" 3 star ratings:

O'Keeron Rutherford has a grade of a 78 on 247 (80 is a 3 star, 70-79 is a 2 star)

Shaq Jackson is a 5.4 on Rivals (need a 5.5 for a 3 star

Josh Greer was just rated a 5.4 on Rivals as well

Also, a few of our 3-stars are very close to being 3 stars on at least one more website.

Fonzale is a 5.4 on Rivals

Garner is a 5.4 on Rivals

Jalen Adams is a 5.4 on Rivals

Andrew Jones is a 78 on 247

Brandon Garner is a 78 on 247

Connor Means is a 78 on 247

Willy Ivery is a 79 on 247

Another reason we shouldn't always put too much stock into stars (I use

offer lists and film ahead of stars) is a guy like Chris Miles, the Flower

Mound offensive lineman. Look at this offer list: This is easily a 3 star

offer list yet he is a 2-star? Very excited to have him and I couldn't

care less that he is not a 3 star. Very valuable commit and smart kid

who will do well on the field and in the classroom."

________________________________

Thanks for your research, BillySee58! :goodjob:

GMG!

PS: Did I leave a name off the 3-star list because I think you said "9" 3 stars in your original research.

So stars DO mean something this year? It's hard to keep up.

  • Upvote 3
Posted

Only when it's in our favor.

Exactly. But in all honesty, it's just a frame of reference. Especially after they finish their college football careers.

The more important thing is a player's offer list (who you beat out and who wanted him at some point), his highlight tape, and production. We have players who have some pretty sweet offer lists, great highlight tape, and absolutely dominated on the high school level like you would hope to see from your signees.

Posted

It's nice to have extra stars, but it ultimately does not determine the sucess or failure of classes. Whenever I've gotten the chance to speak with coaches and scouts, they pretty much all agree that you have 100 or so bonified five-star "can't miss" prospects, and then everyone else is slotted according to who is recruiting them. That's why the ratings for 2-4 star players fluctuate all the time - when the big boys are recruiting them, it is assumed that they've got something in the bag.

That's not to say that stars are meaningless - if other people believe that they have value, then it can't hurt to have perception (and positive PR) on your side.

Posted

That's funny, SMU considered him one of their beat recruits.

I must say anyone who turns down SMU for UTSA doesn't value their education or future past football. Moronic. I'm not saying SMU is the best school ever but good lord I would have made that decision for my kid.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.