DT

KRAM1 · September 1, 2013

I guess some people just see what they want to see. ;-)

Does this pertain to basketball as well? :zoro: :judge:

Edited September 1, 2013 by KRAM1

cdizzle86 · September 1, 2013

I'm happy for DT. He played great last night, but we've seen this from him before. He has the talent to perform at a high level. BUT we've also seen him play at the opposite end of the spectrum. I, for one, hope he continues to play like this, but I'm not holding my breath.

Congrats on the win DT! Lets go for 2-0 against Ohio.

greenit · September 1, 2013

I hope the difference now is that IF DT regresses, we have viable options.

Christopher Walker · September 1, 2013

DT #4 nationally in QBR - http://espn.go.com/college-football/qbr

Small sample size and a couple more games yet to be played, but still fun to see.

Wow. You know what just wow. Forget what I said earlier. Improvement isn't wholly required. I hope DT and the coaching staff can find a way to bottle that performance and deliver it week in and out.

This is a beautiful list to read down.

UNT90 · September 1, 2013

Does this pertain to basketball as well?

Yes, it does, Mark.

Yes, it does...

Proud North Texan · September 1, 2013

Well done DT and good luck

MeanMag · September 1, 2013

Congrats to # 7- I fully support you.

We must put DT's performance in perspective...this was a REALLY bad Idaho defense that looked lost. All of the high percentage/quick throws that DT completed will not be there against a good secondary like Ohio. Ohio will definitely gameplan for this type of passing attack and force us to beat them deep in the passing game. Deep balls have never been DT's strength. If there had a been a defensive back within 10-15 feet of Chancellor, that long ball would have been intercepted.

I doubt he would think about throwing that if a defender were within striking distance.