Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There's an interesting essay by Geoffrey Parker in the most recent Chronicle of Higher Education on the history of climate changes & our response (or rather failure to respond).

http://chronicle.com/article/The-Inevitable-Climate/139423/?cid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en

Man has an unfortunate propensity for choosing short-term profit over long-term good. It's our evolutionary heritage.


Unfortunately, the current debate on climate change favors procrastination because it confuses two issues: whether the global climate changes, and, if so, whether humans are to blame. Some people still doubt the second proposition (just as some people still deny that smoking increases the risk of lung cancer), but the 17th-century record leaves no doubt about the first: Climate change occurs, and it can have catastrophic consequences. This cruel calculus has not changed. The global crisis of the 17th century killed millions of people, but a natural catastrophe of similar proportions today—regardless of whether humans are to blame—will kill billions of people. It will almost certainly also produce dislocation and violence, and it will compromise international security, sustainability, and cooperation.

Climate change will occur & it will be due in large part to human activities. We've passed the tipping point & there's nothing we can do to stop global warming & the other changes in our world. There are things we can do to mitigate the effects that are coming. First & foremost, we can recognize that burning fossil fuels will only make things worse. We must shift to nuclear energy, tidal energy, & solar energy. We must give up the silliness of living miles from where we work. We must realize that our houses are too large & our cars too fast. Most difficult of all - we must understand that there are too many of us on this damaged old planet.

We must be more intelligent.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 4
Posted

There's an interesting essay by Geoffrey Parker in the most recent Chronicle of Higher Education on the history of climate changes & our response (or rather failure to respond).

http://chronicle.com/article/The-Inevitable-Climate/139423/?cid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en

Man has an unfortunate propensity for choosing short-term profit over long-term good. It's our evolutionary heritage.

Climate change will occur & it will be due in large part to human activities. We've passed the tipping point & there's nothing we can do to stop global warming & the other changes in our world. There are things we can do to mitigate the effects that are coming. First & foremost, we can recognize that burning fossil fuels will only make things worse. We must shift to nuclear energy, tidal energy, & solar energy. We must give up the silliness of living miles from where we work. We must realize that our houses are too large & our cars too fast. Most difficult of all - we must understand that there are too many of us on this damaged old planet.

We must be more intelligent.

Yet, you choose to ignore the historical longevity of representative democracies and what inevitably causes their demise (with far more historical proof, by the way).

Oh, the irony.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Posted

Good God, it's 1975 all over again,...we're all gonna freeze to death!

http://denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm

Rick

Whatever Rick, that isn't what i was saying. I was saying you insinuating that volcanos were somehow involved in any sort of global warming debate were spurious at best.

However to respond to your joke, a super volcano erruption would render the Earth all but unliveabe for us. Some humans would survive, so we're not talking extinction level event here, but most would die off since there just wouldn't be enough sun to feed us all. Of course those happen so infrequently I am not gonna lose any sleep over it.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

Yet, you choose to ignore the historical longevity of representative democracies and what inevitably causes their demise (with far more historical proof, by the way).

Okay, UNT90 - you've lost me. What is the inevitable cause of the demise of representative democracy?

Posted

Okay, UNT90 - you've lost me. What is the inevitable cause of the demise of representative democracy?

Isn't it typically some sort of outside threat that allows a single person (usually a general) to take command to reduce the threat, then never giving up that power, and becoming a dictator?

  • Upvote 2
Posted

Isn't it typically some sort of outside threat that allows a single person (usually a general) to take command to reduce the threat, then never giving up that power, and becoming a dictator?

Rick Perry?

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Posted

Whatever Rick, that isn't what i was saying. I was saying you insinuating that volcanos were somehow involved in any sort of global warming debate were spurious at best.

However to respond to your joke, a super volcano erruption would render the Earth all but unliveabe for us. Some humans would survive, so we're not talking extinction level event here, but most would die off since there just wouldn't be enough sun to feed us all. Of course those happen so infrequently I am not gonna lose any sleep over it.

No, I was referring to the tons and tons of carbon emitted into the air from volcanoes all over the planet that we can't control.

I was also going to mention the tons and tons of carbon from China, Nancy Pelosi's jetset lifestyle and other regions of the industrialized planet that none of us here can control...either, but I won't.

Rick

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 2
Posted

No, I was referring to the tons and tons of carbon emitted into the air from volcanoes all over the planet that we can't control.

Yes, insinuating that those emissions would heat up the planet all things being equal. But as I said, the ash those erruptions kick up actually does the opposite.

Posted

I was also going to mention the tons and tons of carbon from China, Nancy Pelosi's jetset lifestyle and other regions of the industrialized planet that none of us here can control...either, but I won't.

http://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2012-10/daily-infographic-if-everyone-lived-american-how-many-earths-would-we-need

Pretty sure we can make a hefty dent in things if we stopped doing a lot of what we do. (Like buying cheap shit from China.)

Seriously need to go to the UAB and check out that decadence.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Yes, insinuating that those emissions would heat up the planet all things being equal. But as I said, the ash those erruptions kick up actually does the opposite.

My volcanoe comment was in reference to this quote above.

"First & foremost, we can recognize that burning fossil fuels will only make things worse."

As if to say us humans here in the U.S. can counter the massive carbon emitting activity of volcanoes and the rest of the industrialized world by stop using fossil fuels.

Rick

  • Upvote 1
Posted

No, I was referring to the tons and tons of carbon emitted into the air from volcanoes all over the planet that we can't control.

I was also going to mention the tons and tons of carbon from China, Nancy Pelosi's jetset lifestyle and other regions of the industrialized planet that none of us here can control...either, but I won't.

Rick

Ahhhh yes, the ole I have no valid argument so I'm going to bash Nancy Pelosi move. Brilliant.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 4
Posted

Okay, UNT90 - you've lost me. What is the inevitable cause of the demise of representative democracy?

Your a fine UNT grad and a google expert.

Off you go.

Let me know what you learn.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)

If you want to debate where humans are causing global warming or not, go ahead, scientists can conduct studies and find correlations for and against both sides. But I see absolutely no reason NOT to improve pollution controls, that is a concern for public health and something that everyone should get behind. If it in any way helps slow down global warming (if we are causing it) then bravo.

But, sucks to your asthmar, I suppose.

Edited by MDH
  • Upvote 2
Posted

Your a fine UNT grad and a google expert.

Off you go.

Let me know what you learn.

The most common hit on Google on 'demise of representative democracy' is "Reaganism and the death of representative democracy." Somehow I don't think that's what you meant. So please, enlighten me - what did you mean?

Posted

http://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2012-10/daily-infographic-if-everyone-lived-american-how-many-earths-would-we-need

Pretty sure we can make a hefty dent in things if we stopped doing a lot of what we do. (Like buying cheap shit from China.)

Seriously need to go to the UAB and check out that decadence.

Birmingham, Alabama?

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.