Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I think the score would be UTA 55, UNT 73.

I saw in the paper that UNT lost a tough game last night, and we haven't been playing well lately, at least at home. It's been rough at CPC this year.

We've failed to score 50 points 4 times this season now. Last night's game for UTA against Seattle was reminiscent of some of the bad mid-80s Mavs teams on the stage. Mavs have no inside game if our main center is defended well, we were 2-23 outside, and got down 20-4 to a team that had only won 5 games on the year and no conference wins. We play well on the road, but rarely win at home. Last night's crowd of 1100 was very Texas-Hall like...not much noise and in a 7000 seat arena, just not much home court advantage lately. Part of it could be we've got basically a Southland team playing in a better WAC, but we're gonna have to get a LOT better if we're gonna go .500 in the SunBelt next year, much less try to contend.

Edited by utamav91
Posted

Would depend entirely upon who "showed up" to play. In our case you never seem to know these days.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Posted

It would be close for a half, your coach would adjust well to us like he has the past several years and the second half would be less competitive as we flail helplessly. Next.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

I think the score would be UTA 55, UNT 73.

I saw in the paper that UNT lost a tough game last night, and we haven't been playing well lately, at least at home. It's been rough at CPC this year.

We've failed to score 50 points 4 times this season now. Last night's game against Seattle was reminiscent of some of the bad mid-80s Mavs teams on the stage. No inside game, 2-23 outside, down 20-4 to a team that had only won 5 games on the year and no conference wins. We play well on the road, but rarely win at home. Last night's crowd of 1100 was very Texas-Hall like...not much noise and in a 7000 seat arena, just not much home court advantage lately. Part of it could be we've got basically a Southland team playing in a better WAC, but we're gonna have to get a LOT better if we're gonna go .500 in the SunBelt next year, much less try to contend.

i was very confused at to what you were talking about until i realized the stats you put up weren't for our team...

Ill just say that you are highly overrating UNT's ability to score and defend with that prediction...

Posted
I think the score would be UTA 55, UNT 73.

I saw in the paper that UNT lost a tough game last night, and we haven't been playing well lately, at least at home. It's been rough at CPC this year.

We've failed to score 50 points 4 times this season now. Last night's game for UTA against Seattle was reminiscent of some of the bad mid-80s Mavs teams on the stage. Mavs have no inside game if our main center is defended well, we were 2-23 outside, and got down 20-4 to a team that had only won 5 games on the year and no conference wins. We play well on the road, but rarely win at home. Last night's crowd of 1100 was very Texas-Hall like...not much noise and in a 7000 seat arena, just not much home court advantage lately. Part of it could be we've got basically a Southland team playing in a better WAC, but we're gonna have to get a LOT better if we're gonna go .500 in the SunBelt next year, much less try to contend.

Cool story. That's super awesome news.

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 6

      Minnesota forum

    2. 6

      Army Game TV Ratings (number of viewers)

    3. 204

      Minnesota (11/13/24)

    4. 6

      Minnesota forum

    5. 5

      ***OFFICIAL UNT vs. UTSA IN-GAME DISCUSSION***

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,476
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.