Realignment of FBS

[Arkstfan]

On 11/22/2012 at 12:07 AM, GrandGreen said:

Actually under the current system, the bigs have nearly all of everything anyway. Why should they change. They will channel all the "majors" into four conferences (SEC, Big 10, Big 12, Pac 10) and run everything anyway. They get probably 80% of the revenue now, why change and risk having to play other teams that actually have a good chance to beat you.

 

 

I wish someone or thing would actually advocate changes that would encourage competition and the health of all teams. Put a limit of coaches salaries, facilities, and limit the number of home games possible. Do away with one way coaches contracts, you sign; you complete the contract. Slow down at least a little on the foolish athletic arms race which really only benefits AD staff and primarily coaches. Anti - American and against free enterprise, not really. The pros already do some of this in the name of competition and they are for profit organizations College athletics are non-profits and are on perilous ground IMO paying HC millions of dollars while the players are considered amateurs. 

You are spot on!
 

Why deal with the potential anti-trust issues of leaving? Why deal with the potential political headaches? 
 

Want the vast money NCAA reaps? Start your own tournament and give auto bids or just guarantee top 16-20-24 rated champs.