Jump to content

Coach Mac Show Tonight 7PM

Harry

By Harry
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Harry Grand Master

Harry

Posted
Posted

gallery_1_139_332594.jpg

DENTON, Texas - The Dan McCarney show can be heard tonight from Rudy's BBQ in Denton. The hour-long show can be heard on the Mean Green Radio Network on 95.3 KHYI and 88.1 FM KNTU.

You can join the Mean Green's head coach and his host, George Dunham, for an hour of insights and highlights starting at 7 p.m. as they talk about the game with Houston and look ahead to Louisiana-Lafayette.

Trivia questions and prizes will be part of the hour-long show along with a live microphone for fans to ask questions of Coach McCarney.

Direct link to KNTU

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KRAM1 Rookie

KRAM1

Posted
Posted

I'll be there...as usual. And, would encourage some new folks to attend. We pretty much see the same folks each time. Great to see them each week for sure, but would be good to start getting a few more folks to attend. I know these things seem to be "easier" to make the effort to attend when the team wins, but support is important at times such as this as well when the team and coaching staff is doing the re-build/re-load thing. It really means more now than when the good times start rolling in...as we all know...easy to be there and support a winning team, not so much when the effort is not turning into wins...or as many as we would all like.

Come on by Rudy's this evening if you have the chance. It's a lot more fun than sitting around waiting for Monday Night Football to come on...and, if you are a MNF person...you can be home in time to catch most of it anyway.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harry Grand Master

Harry

Posted
  • Author
Posted

He said that he hurt for the team, because of how hard the worked and did not get results. Said Blake Dunham is doing a great job at deep snapper and won special teams player of the game. Said Zach Olen is back and that Coach Quartaro helped him immensely. Spoke highly of Derek Thompson, said no one is harder on Derek than himself. Said the ULL game is a huge national opportunity. Spoke about a recruit who will be at the game with his coaches and may commit that night. Praised the fans who made the trip to Denton to support the team. He spoke in detail about the freshman defensive line which I addressed in another thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNTFan23 Community Regular

UNTFan23

Posted
Posted

He said that he hurt for the team, because of how hard the worked and did not get results. Said Blake Dunham is doing a great job at deep snapper and won special teams player of the game. Said Zach Olen is back and that Coach Quartaro helped him immensely. Spoke highly of Derek Thompson, said no one is harder on Derek than himself. Said the ULL game is a huge national opportunity. Spoke about a recruit who will be at the game with his coaches and may commit that night. Praised the fans who made the trip to Denton to support the team. He spoke in detail about the freshman defensive line which I addressed in another thread.

He mentioned tackling wasn't what he wanted (lots of arm tackles etc.) and it sounded like it was something he wanted the team to focus on before the next game.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT 90 Grad Grand Master

UNT 90 Grad

Posted
Posted

Did he comment on his decision to take a knee with iver a minute left in the half?

Yes. He said he stands by his decision. He said he and Canales were on the same page. He said that they hadn't been stellar at passing and they didn't want to give Houston a chance for a big play. The fact that North Texas would be receiving the kick in the second half played into the decision too.

I'm just the messenger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted (edited)

Yes. He said he stands by his decision. He said he and Canales were on the same page. He said that they hadn't been stellar at passing and they didn't want to give Houston a chance for a big play. The fact that North Texas would be receiving the kick in the second half played into the decision too.

I'm just the messenger.

This really is a non-issue. You are getting the ball back 1st in the second half, so why take the risk in that situation.

The interesting part of the exchange with George on this matter: Mac says he didn't want to risk a turnover and not trusting the passing game, then has to be reminded by George that UNT got the bal back 1st in the second half before including that in the decision process.

That tells me, along with running the ball 9 out of the 10 first 1st downs, that Mac does not trust any part of the passing game. If we can't run against 8 and 9 man fronts the rest of the year, get ready for nothing more than 14-21 point productions a game from the offense, with 21 being VERY optimistic.

This doesn't bode well at all going forward

Edited by UNT90
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNTcrazy727 Grand Master

UNTcrazy727

Posted
Posted

This really is a non-issue. You are getting the ball back 1st in the second half, so why take the risk in that situation.

The interesting part of the exchange with George on this matter: Mac says he didn't want to risk a turnover and not trusting the passing game, then has to be reminded by George that UNT got the bal back 1st in the second half before including that in the decision process.

That tells me, along with running the ball 9 out of the 10 first 1st downs, that Mac does not trust any part of the passing game. If we can't run against 8 and 9 man fronts the rest of the year, get ready for nothing more than 14-21 point productions a game from the offense, with 21 being VERY optimistic.

This doesn't bode well at all going forward

Or you could be ballsy and say to yourself, "let's go get some points before the half and then even more to start the 2nd," but obviously the coaches have no faith in DT and are content with 17-21 pts a game. I'm sorry, but when there's no faith in the QB you might as well pack it in and call it a year. At best we win two more games this year. Sucks to say, but realistically I don't see how anyone can say we win more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CurveItAround Newbie

CurveItAround

Posted
Posted

Or you could be ballsy and say to yourself, "let's go get some points before the half and then even more to start the 2nd," but obviously the coaches have no faith in DT and are content with 17-21 pts a game. I'm sorry, but when there's no faith in the QB you might as well pack it in and call it a year. At best we win two more games this year. Sucks to say, but realistically I don't see how anyone can say we win more.

We are going to win more.

There, I said it. I just wish I believed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stan R Collaborator

Stan R

Posted
Posted

This really is a non-issue. You are getting the ball back 1st in the second half, so why take the risk in that situation.

The interesting part of the exchange with George on this matter: Mac says he didn't want to risk a turnover and not trusting the passing game, then has to be reminded by George that UNT got the bal back 1st in the second half before including that in the decision process.

That tells me, along with running the ball 9 out of the 10 first 1st downs, that Mac does not trust any part of the passing game. If we can't run against 8 and 9 man fronts the rest of the year, get ready for nothing more than 14-21 point productions a game from the offense, with 21 being VERY optimistic.

This doesn't bode well at all going forward

So, if he doesn't trust the current QB, what does that say about the backups? But here's where I'm confused, he (Mac) had no problem whatsoever putting in Osbourne last year at times. Why the reluctance this year??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MeanGreenDan Mentor

MeanGreenDan

Posted
Posted

This really is a non-issue. You are getting the ball back 1st in the second half, so why take the risk in that situation.

Why? Because we were having a hell of a time stopping them from scoring on any drive, so the opportunity for us to put two scoring drives together in a row and cut the deficit might be why you take the risk.

The way the game was going (and went), the only way you were going to make it competitive was to be risky and take some gambles. Or you can do like Canales and Mac ultimately decided to do, which was to admit defeat, be as conservative as possible, and try to lose by as little as possible. That worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted

This really is a non-issue. You are getting the ball back 1st in the second half, so why take the risk in that situation.

B.S. You are a FBS football team and you don't have a two minute offense? You don't leave points on the board, you look at the clock and say, "Let's go down and score and do it again to start the second half." Take advantage of the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted (edited)

B.S. You are a FBS football team and you don't have a two minute offense? You don't leave points on the board, you look at the clock and say, "Let's go down and score and do it again to start the second half." Take advantage of the situation.

Unless you know you are going to lose the game and you are trying to shorten said game.

Again, 9 of 10 running plays on the first 10 first down plays, against 8 and 9 in the box, tells you everything you need to know.

Edited by UNT90
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted

B.S. You are a FBS football team and you don't have a two minute offense? You don't leave points on the board, you look at the clock and say, "Let's go down and score and do it again to start the second half." Take advantage of the situation.

We have perhaps the shallowest depth in all of FBS at the quarterback position.

There is a reason the back ups don't play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 10

      McGill scored in the 2nd Quarter.

      The McGill non-TD was 50/50. With my green glasses on, the ball broke the goal line more or less as his knee hit. The problem was that they didn’t call it a TD and therefore harder to call the TD on replay when that close. The real problem is our inability to get TDs when in the redzone, particularly short yardage. Can’t run for one yard and it’s pathetic. Should never need to pass from the one yard line and if we do it should be some kind of play action misdirection to a block and release TE. The play calling in general was terrible this game. The decision making (on sides kick) was even worse. On a related note, the non-fumble and the PI call were ridiculous. I can sort-of, kind-of see the PI call because it was a bang bang play and refs are human, but the fumble was a fumble and they got it wrong live and on replay. The AD needs to file a protest to the league. That ref should be suspended.
      97and03 in Mean Green Football
    2. 10

      McGill scored in the 2nd Quarter.

      So was the radio play-by-play. Wish there was a video replay for me to see this. I also wish there was better checks-and-balances. In the NFL, can't a team submit a replay of a call to the NFL office for review, even if it doesn't mean a change in the final score? At least there would be some transparency and accountability. Based on the radio play by play, you would think that giving McGill the TD was a no-brainer, and the game might have ended up very differently. An option offense playing from behind is very different from one playing to keep a lead.. (granted, it was still early in our game)
      greenminer in Mean Green Football
    3. 4

      No moral victories

      We knew this 3-game stretch of Memphis, Tulane and Army would be tough. We lost by 8, 8 and 11 points. We are another year away (with better players and coaches).
      NT80 in Mean Green Football
    4. 4

      Any way to see the replay?

      https://www.espn.com/watch/player/_/id/f4417568-64b4-4d98-b22b-bbb1ef1a84c3
      greenminer in Mean Green Football
    5. 46

      Fire the OC. The defense showed up.

      3 times within 15 yards and walking away with 0 points. There is nothing about that that is on the defense. Emmitt is right.
      greenminer in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,473
    • Most Online
      1,865
    BleedGreen4
    Newest Member
    BleedGreen4
    Joined

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.