Jump to content

The CougarKing Comes to GMG Thread (With Guest Star MeanGreener)

Cougar King

By Cougar King
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

PlummMeanGreen Grand Master

PlummMeanGreen

Posted
Posted

The Carnegie Foundation does not use the term tier one nor do they rank universities they place various aspects of universities into different classifications that are not to be used to imply equality of the overall university

there are 8 total universities looking for NRUF funding not 7 and UH and Texas Tech have been awarded that funding

US News is the only organization that uses "tier one" and that ranks universities and as of this year UH is in the US News tier one universities with a numerical ranking

If we're talking about the same thing here, North Texas met every criteria which Texas Tech and UH met except the all important endowment coffers. I think it has to be a minimum of $400 million, so I guess it will be awhile for North Texas.

GMG!

  • Upvote 1
  • Replies 467
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Cougar King
Cougar King

Where have you been the last 5 years? Unlike UNT, we have sold out our stadium almost every game including TxST and La Tech. We brought 30k to Reliant this past weekend even though we were 0-3. Colle

oldguystudent
oldguystudent

Cougars = MILFs MILFs = mothers Mean Green = Eagles Mean Green = Mother ****ing Eagles

UNT 90 Grad
UNT 90 Grad

UNT 30, Cougar High 28 Olen has a statement game with 11 made field goals and one taken off the board due to a Houston personal foul as part of our new game strategy.

GL2Greatness Newbie

GL2Greatness

Posted
Posted

If we're talking about the same thing here, North Texas met every criteria which Texas Tech and UH met except the all important endowment coffers. I think it has to be a minimum of $400 million, so I guess it will be awhile for North Texas.

GMG!

actually north Texas only met one of the 4 (out of 6) needed criteria and also did not meet the restricted research requirement

you need to have 45 million in restricted research per year first and foremost before anything else matters north Texas was at 14,476,509 in restricted research and without meeting the 45 million metric nothing else matters

out of the other 6 criteria (4 of 6 need to be met) north Texas met one being a member of Phi Kappa Phi all but UTSA and TxState met this and UTSA now meets this as well

the other criteria are

400 million in endowment (not met) (UH and TTU met)

200 PhDs graduated per year (not met) (UH and TTU met)

freshman class of high academic achievement (not met) (UTD, UTA, TTU met)

high quality faculty (not met) (UTD UH met)

high quality graduation education (not met) no one met but there is a chance that UTD, TTU, or UH or all 3 could have met with a paid for audit of 5 graduate programs to determine of their metrics were similar to AAU universities, but since it was not needed by UH or TTU and would not have helped elevate UTD to funding none of them opted to pay to have the state audit them

aztecskin Experienced

aztecskin

Posted
Posted

actually north Texas only met one of the 4 (out of 6) needed criteria and also did not meet the restricted research requirement

you need to have 45 million in restricted research per year first and foremost before anything else matters north Texas was at 14,476,509 in restricted research and without meeting the 45 million metric nothing else matters

out of the other 6 criteria (4 of 6 need to be met) north Texas met one being a member of Phi Kappa Phi all but UTSA and TxState met this and UTSA now meets this as well

the other criteria are

400 million in endowment (not met) (UH and TTU met)

200 PhDs graduated per year (not met) (UH and TTU met)

freshman class of high academic achievement (not met) (UTD, UTA, TTU met)

high quality faculty (not met) (UTD UH met)

high quality graduation education (not met) no one met but there is a chance that UTD, TTU, or UH or all 3 could have met with a paid for audit of 5 graduate programs to determine of their metrics were similar to AAU universities, but since it was not needed by UH or TTU and would not have helped elevate UTD to funding none of them opted to pay to have the state audit them

This wouldn't have been helped by good punctuation at all. Nope. Good job.

  • Upvote 2
UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted

The Carnegie Foundation does not use the term tier one nor do they rank universities they place various aspects of universities into different classifications that are not to be used to imply equality of the overall university

there are 8 total universities looking for NRUF funding not 7 and UH and Texas Tech have been awarded that funding

US News is the only organization that uses "tier one" and that ranks universities and as of this year UH is in the US News tier one universities with a numerical ranking

Just basing my information off of the UofH website dedicated to their attempts to be Tier One.

http://www.uh.edu/about/tier-one/tier-one-faq/index.php

  • Upvote 1
UNTexas Community Regular

UNTexas

Posted
Posted

I've been to a lot of cusa road games and watched on tv. ECU and UTEP can be tough places and UCF is okay but everybody else doesn't come even close to the Rob.

Agreed. Houston is a dump with a good chance of a good ole fashioned mugging. UTEP is tough too because your car will get stolen or a stray round from Juarez might clip you while watching the game.

On a side note, you have ninja like troll skills. Do you gain these powers from endless hours away from the yellow sun in your mom's basement or is it the cheetos stained fingers while sporting filthy streaked tightly whities? Or are you simply just GL2Greatness in disguise? No matter what it's good stuff all around.

  • Upvote 1
GL2Greatness Newbie

GL2Greatness

Posted
Posted

Just basing my information off of the UofH website dedicated to their attempts to be Tier One.

http://www.uh.edu/ab...e-faq/index.php

an unfortunate, but deliberate misrepresentation

http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/resources/faqs.php

Where are the Carnegie rankings?

The Carnegie Foundation does not rank colleges and universities. Our classifications identify meaningful similarities and differences among institutions, but they do not imply quality differences.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
UNT 90 Grad Grand Master

UNT 90 Grad

Posted
Posted

There is nothing hostile about Houston's stadium. The only thing that was dangerous about the place was the host team that took the field, and that's obviously behind them now.

Maybe the rob is used as a hostile during the week.

UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
Posted

actually north Texas only met one of the 4 (out of 6) needed criteria and also did not meet the restricted research requirement

you need to have 45 million in restricted research per year first and foremost before anything else matters north Texas was at 14,476,509 in restricted research and without meeting the 45 million metric nothing else matters

out of the other 6 criteria (4 of 6 need to be met) north Texas met one being a member of Phi Kappa Phi all but UTSA and TxState met this and UTSA now meets this as well

the other criteria are

400 million in endowment (not met) (UH and TTU met)

200 PhDs graduated per year (not met) (UH and TTU met)

freshman class of high academic achievement (not met) (UTD, UTA, TTU met)

high quality faculty (not met) (UTD UH met)

high quality graduation education (not met) no one met but there is a chance that UTD, TTU, or UH or all 3 could have met with a paid for audit of 5 graduate programs to determine of their metrics were similar to AAU universities, but since it was not needed by UH or TTU and would not have helped elevate UTD to funding none of them opted to pay to have the state audit them

Virgin.

No doubt about it.

  • Upvote 3
meangreanmick Collaborator

meangreanmick

Posted
Posted (edited)

Prediction:

Cougar high 24

Mean green 13

We're getting better, their going down hill - almost there.

Prediction 2: cougar King arrested after game for orally pleasuring another cougar high male student "but it was mutual". Very similar to their SMU brethren.

Edited by meangreanmick
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Cougar King Mentor

Cougar King

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Prediction:

Cougar high 24

Mean green 13

We're getting better, their going down hill - almost there.

Prediction 2: cougar King arrested after game for orally pleasuring another cougar high male student "but it was mutual". Very similar to their SMU brethren.

You obviously ran out of intelligent things to say, which is why you made a reference regarding my sexuality and for the record, your insinuation is quite inaccurate. I hope a lot of you come to The Rob this weekend.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
TheTastyGreek Collaborator

TheTastyGreek

Posted
Posted

I would like to apologize on behalf of my hotheaded (and insecure) friend, CarribbeanGreen. I can confirm that he's just a little bitter because he did not meet U of H's stringent entrance requirements.

But, it's not entirely his fault... When we made our visit down there, he just happened to forget his sandals in the car. But, rules are rules, and even though he was wearing a shirt... They wouldn't let him in.

It also bears mentioning that he was 3 years past college graduation... And we were only stopping on campus there so he could use the bathroom... But, the rejection still stings, obviously.

All About UNT Veteran

All About UNT

Posted
Posted

You obviously ran out of intelligent things to say, which is why you made a reference regarding my sexuality and for the record, your insinuation is quite inaccurate. I hope a lot of you come to The Rob this weekend.

Real question...what happened to you and your goal of walking on at North Texas?

cwb Contributor

cwb

Posted
Posted

Prediction:

Cougar high 24

Mean green 13

We're getting better, their going down hill - almost there.

Prediction 2: cougar King arrested after game for orally pleasuring another cougar high male student "but it was mutual". Very similar to their SMU brethren.

Gosh dammit! If we are going to talk education and sports smack, by god read your posts before pressing the post button. I don't care if you are on your phone or whatever, PROOF READ!!! I am sick of looking like I graduated from a junior college. Unless they own a " going down hill".

  • Upvote 2
greenminer Grand Master

greenminer

Posted
Posted

Gosh dammit! If we are going to talk education and sports smack, by god read your posts before pressing the post button. I don't care if you are on your phone or whatever, PROOF READ!!! I am sick of looking like I graduated from a junior college. Unless they own a " going down hill".

You're going to remain a very angry man. That stuff is all over the internet. I bet I can find it in a Harvard forum.

ea8f5937-020c-4806-a142-a2fc427555b7.jpg

  • Upvote 1
Eastwood Eagle Newbie

Eastwood Eagle

Posted
Posted

You obviously ran out of intelligent things to say, which is why you made a reference regarding my sexuality and for the record, your insinuation is quite inaccurate. I hope a lot of you come to The Rob this weekend.

Yeah. I even agree that was lame smack talk.

  • Upvote 1
meangreanmick Collaborator

meangreanmick

Posted
Posted

Gosh dammit! If we are going to talk education and sports smack, by god read your posts before pressing the post button. I don't care if you are on your phone or whatever, PROOF READ!!! I am sick of looking like I graduated from a junior college. Unless they own a " going down hill".

Fair enough, but in my defence ( that's for you right there), we were about to go under 10'000 ft and lose our Gogo and I didn't catch that the iPad autocorrect didn't quite autocorrect correctly in my haste to post.

And cougar king - that wasn't an insinuation. I said you provided oral pleasure to men, I feel like that's fairly direct. An insinuation would be more like if I suggested you like to have a big cucumber in your mouth. See how that works?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 303

      UNT vs Texas State BOWL GAME THREAD!!

      I agree, but that’s not the way it’s presented here. EVERYTHING is the coaches fault according to many on this forum.
      NT93 in Mean Green Football
    2. 2

      Duke/SMU

      Smut lost by 27. They don't belong.
      Hunter Green in Mean Green Basketball
    3. 36

      Seth Littrell

      Yes, EM has very similar records to SL, but are we not in a better conference, playing better teams? The AAC was 6-2 in bowl games, C-USA was 1-4. This is an important aspect that is always overlooked in the EM vs SL argument. Also, SL didn’t have to deal with NIL or the portal (granted, it’s possible he would have handled it well, but I have my doubts). Finally, I just don’t feel like we get our asses handed to us near as much as with SL. I know there are those that say “a loss is a loss,” but I’d much rather lose by one score instead of three score. I looked up the numbers at one time, but the number of 21+ point losses under SL was just crazy. In the past two seasons we have 10 conference losses, and 6 of those have been one score games. Only twice have we been throttled in conference…last year vs SMU and this year vs UTSA. This year we lost to 3 of the top 4 teams in the conference (Army, Tulane, and Memphis). Last year we lost to the top 4 teams in the conference (SMU, Tulane, Memphis, and UTSA). That’s bad luck on scheduling to even have to play all of the top teams in the conference. None of this is meant as praise for EM. I’m just saying that I think it’s obviously better than SL. I’ll give the rest of the argument as I honestly don’t have a clue.
      NT93 in Mean Green Football
    4. 36

      Seth Littrell

      I don't have much to add other than to say I agree with you. We seem to have a lot of fans that just enjoy mediocrity and moral victories. BuT We PlAyEd BeTtEr FoR oNe GaMe, We aRe GoInG sOmEwHeRe
      BigWillie in Mean Green Football
    5. 2

      Impressed with Meste

      Reminds me of Riley Dodge in his state championship game at Southlake-Carroll.
      • 2
      • Upvote
      • Eye Roll
      greenjoe in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,508
    • Most Online
      1,865
    Jepper
    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined

  • Most Points

    1. 1
      El Paso Eagle
      El Paso Eagle
      171,034
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      139,638
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      132,620
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      125,740
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      109,459

  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,592,647
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,482,399
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      842,867
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      671,592
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
      SteaminWillieBeamin
    7. 7
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      467,039
    8. 8
      cousin oliver
      cousin oliver
      448,120
    9. 9
      meangreenfaninno
    10. 10
      South Texas Green

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.