Jump to content

These are the people in the White House

UNT90
 Share

Recommended Posts

Censored by Laurie Veteran

Censored by Laurie

Posted
Posted

a transgendered man dropped down on one knee and proposed to his partner

Aw. Thank you for bringing such a heart-warming story to the attention of all of us. What a special event and setting to ask the love of your life to be yours for the rest of one's life. You know, with so much negativity and pessimism in the world today, it is truly life-affirming when you hear about touching stories such as this one.

Thank you, UNT90!

  • Upvote 7
  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCREAMING EAGLE-66 Rookie

SCREAMING EAGLE-66

Posted
Posted

They were vistors ... idiots can get in. Note--- the White House officials disapproved of what they did.

Tell the whole truth again.... and don't make it look like the current resident approved, they didn't.

Your sourse, Washington Times, is an extreme news paper printed by the Unification Church founded by Sun Myung Moon by aka Moonies ... A South Korean odd sect.. .

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
  • Author
Posted

These are gay rights leaders invited to the White House by the current President.

Yes, you are responsible for your guest, and, more importantly, the company that you keep, in life as well as in politics.

Isn't it just a tad funny that leaders of a group DEMANDING tolerance can be so intolerant?

Things get worse and worse for the re-election campaign.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

They were vistors ... idiots can get in. Note--- the White House officials disapproved of what they did.

Tell the whole truth again.... and don't make it look like the current resident approved, they didn't.

Your sourse, Washington Times, is an extreme news paper printed by the Unification Church founded by Sun Myung Moon by aka Moonies ... A South Korean odd sect.. .

Bout the opposite political equivalent of the NYT, right? But that's ok, cause they think like you, right?

This has been widely reported. He'll, they posted the "funny" pictures on Facebook.

Focus.

Here is a link that jives with your politics:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2012/06/22/gay-activists-ronald-reagan-white-house_n_1619392.html

Edited by UNT90
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Greenrex Veteran

Greenrex

Posted
Posted

Those who seek to publicly and vocally vilify homosexuality are very often the ones who are later exposed as being homosexual themselves. The best advice for you is to go ahead and make a decision about which way you're going to go and be done with it. No one else really gives a flying flip what your decision is. Just do it.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Those who seek to publicly and vocally vilify homosexuality are very often the ones who are later exposed as being homosexual themselves. The best advice for you is to go ahead and make a decision about which way you're going to go and be done with it. No one else really gives a flying flip what your decision is. Just do it.

The typical liberal response. When you have no argument, Make it personal.

I haven't tried to vilify anything. I just posted a news story and thought it was funny how a group supposedly seeking tolerance was extremely intolerant of someone with opposite political views.

Kinda like you and your comments about my sexuality, don't you think?

This isn't a gay issue. This is a manners issue. You don't disrespect former presidents when you are extended an invitation to the White House.

It's rude, uncivil, and just plain bush league, no matter what group you are or what former president you are disrespecting.

It reflects poorly on the President and will cost him politically.

Edited by UNT90
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Greenrex Veteran

Greenrex

Posted
Posted

The typical liberal response. When you have no argument, Make it personal.

I haven't tried to vilify anything. I just posted a news story and thought it was funny how a group supposedly seeking tolerance was extremely intolerant of someone with opposite political views.

Kinda like you and your comments about my sexuality, don't you think?

This isn't a gay issue. This is a manners issue. You don't disrespect former presidents when you are extended an invitation to the White House.

It's rude, uncivil, and just plain bush league, no matter what group you are or what former president you are disrespecting.

It reflects poorly on the President and will cost him politically.

I absolutely agree. I thought it was rude of them as well. I definitely took your post the wrong way. Please pardon any misstatements on my part!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Green Mean Enthusiast

Green Mean

Posted
Posted

The typical liberal response. When you have no argument, Make it personal.

I haven't tried to vilify anything. I just posted a news story and thought it was funny how a group supposedly seeking tolerance was extremely intolerant of someone with opposite political views.

Kinda like you and your comments about my sexuality, don't you think?

This isn't a gay issue. This is a manors issue. You don't disrespect former presidents when you are extended an invitation to the White House.

It's rude, uncivil, and just plain bush league, no matter what group you are or what former president you are disrespecting.

It reflects poorly on the President and will cost him politically.

You and your "typical liberal" talk nonsense. You certainly seem to quickly pull the trigger as typical liberal when you don't agree or refuse to agree with a certain point or issue that you may not specifically believe in. While I agree that this was an act that is pretty dumb and I don't condone it one bit....you're right this isn't a gay issue but it isn't a political affiliation/stance issue either.

As for reflecting poorly on the president please give me a break. He doesn't and can't control other people's actions and it won't cost him anything politically. There are far more other and more important things to worry about in this country and in this world than a couple of goofballs doing a pretty dumb act.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You and your "typical liberal" talk nonsense. You certainly seem to quickly pull the trigger as typical liberal when you don't agree or refuse to agree with a certain point or issue that you may not specifically believe in. While I agree that this was an act that is pretty dumb and I don't condone it one bit....you're right this isn't a gay issue but it isn't a political affiliation/stance issue either.

As for reflecting poorly on the president please give me a break. He doesn't and can't control other people's actions and it won't cost him anything politically. There are far more other and more important things to worry about in this country and in this world than a couple of goofballs doing a pretty dumb act.

Pretty much the only times I use "typical liberal response" are when the argument turns personal. And the reason I say it is because that is what liberals do.

As far as a political issue, we shall see. Yes, the Prslesident IS responsible for the guest HE invites into OUR white house. It is not his permanent home. His guest are a direct reflection on him.

Whether there is political consequences, time will tell. Like it or not, many Americans view Ronald Reagan as a national hero, amd many of those are in the all important independent voting group. With the health care ruling coming down, this may just be a blip on the radar, but I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It's tough to pull off hypocrisy in only two sentences. Kudos(?)

Go find one post where I have made it personal. Calling someone a liberal isn't an insult. I'm a conservative. Your a liberal. It just is what it is.

Oh, and you can't use posts in the football forum directed at our friend checkfacts.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNTFan23 Community Regular

UNTFan23

Posted
Posted

Go find one post where I have made it personal. Calling someone a liberal isn't an insult. I'm a conservative. Your a liberal. It just is what it is.

Oh, and you can't use posts in the football forum directed at our friend checkfacts.

Maybe liberals want to be called Progressives instead?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FirefightnRick Proficient

FirefightnRick

Posted
Posted

These are gay rights leaders invited to the White House by the current President.

Yes, you are responsible for your guest, and, more importantly, the company that you keep, in life as well as in politics.

Isn't it just a tad funny that leaders of a group DEMANDING tolerance can be so intolerant?

Things get worse and worse for the re-election campaign.

Good post.

Rick

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
yyz28 Enthusiast

yyz28

Posted
Posted

...thought it was funny how a group supposedly seeking tolerance was extremely intolerant of someone with opposite political views.

Good point... Tolerance should be universal if you're demanding it.

...that having been said, there is no excuse for this behavior. Classless behavior by classless people.

...I also, however, don't put this on the Whitehouse.

...if we're gonna hang every person who may visit the Whitehouse and then act like a dip-sh!t around the then sitting President, we'd probably need to line 'em all up. the WH immediately had harsh words for these folks, and that's what (and all) I'd expect of the President in this case.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
emmitt01 Grand Master

emmitt01

Posted
Posted (edited)

What is with these gays nowadays?! Clearly this was a plot by Barack HUSSEIN Obama to disparage a fine upstanding American hero! Typical socialist "flip the bird to an inanimate object" trick.

Now, where did I put my lighter? That cross ain't gonna light itself.

There. Now I'm the second most ridiculous person in this thread.

Edited by emmitt01
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNT90 Newbie

UNT90

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What is with these gays nowadays?! Clearly this was a plot by Barack HUSSEIN Obama to disparage a fine upstanding American hero! Typical socialist "flip the bird to an inanimate object" trick.

Now, where did I put my lighter? That cross ain't gonna light itself.

There. Now I'm the second most ridiculous person in this thread.

No, I think you have most ridiculous pretty much wrapped up.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GreenMachine Newbie

GreenMachine

Posted
Posted

What is with these gays nowadays?! Clearly this was a plot by Barack HUSSEIN Obama to disparage a fine upstanding American hero! Typical socialist "flip the bird to an inanimate object" trick.

Now, where did I put my lighter? That cross ain't gonna light itself.

There. Now I'm the second most ridiculous person in this thread.

always take things to extreme.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 0

      MGN Podcast 235

      I woke @Aldo early, had him do #socialMedia and we recorded it also. This is that recording. https://open.substack.com/pub/meangreennation/p/235-running-out-of-time?r=du4qo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
      aztecskin in Mean Green Football
    2. 5

      #Hit6?

      Lame
      Big Z in Mean Green Football
    3. 2

      Any way to see the replay?

      ESPN+
      NT93 in Mean Green Football
    4. 2

      Any way to see the replay?

      Go to YOUTUBE and request Army/UNT highlights. They had them a few hours after the game yesterday. I don't know about the entire game.
      wardly in Mean Green Football
    5. 298

      ***OFFICIAL ARMY VS MEAN GREEN IN-GAME DISCUSSION***

      The stats with context tell us more. I feel like Army kept the defense on the field on purpose to limit a famously high flying North Texas team. I agree we had turnovers- how effective were they? How many 1st downs did army have in a single drive? Army never turned the ball over on downs with high 3rd down efficiency. We lucked out on the fumble from the RB. How long did it take to get the turnover? How was the field position that the defense earned? Those are better questions. Our defense did a lot and I loved seeing the sack, near fumble (ruled an incompletion), interception, and lack of penalties(that pass interference in the red zone hurt) to deflate their passing game- all 4 attempts. Then, they took us on the ground. Daily slid early to drain more time on a run near the 50. They line up with the same formation for an easy read to gain a yard or two, but, more importantly, the clock starts back up. This was triple option football and I feel like we failed to disrupt their plans. I want us to be better on all sides of the ball. I don’t a moral victory. I want us to acknowledge that Army, just like Tulane 2 weeks ago, used the run effectively against the defense. However, they used it to play at their tempo/style limiting our offense time on the field. I love the heart these players showed. I feel like any one of those teams from Army’s past 13 games are not the caliber we should be proud of being better than (except Coastal and Navy). Watching at army launch the ball vs Temple, Tulsa, & UAB was insane. But Daily is a okay QB that fits the triple option scheme as a runner primarily. Horvath is a miracle for service academy passing. Daily has 51 passing attempts YTD versus Horvath’s monstrous 117 attempts for a service academy. Daily has the same interception rate as Henigan. I’ll see y’all in San Antonio. I’m still excited to see this team play and I know we can win out the season. I just feel like they were par for the course this Army weekend. If anyone complained about the DC all season, this game should not sway someone.
      • 1
      • Lovely Take
      MeanGreenMat in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,473
    • Most Online
      1,865
    BleedGreen4
    Newest Member
    BleedGreen4
    Joined

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.