-
Similar Content
-
- 97 replies
- 12,044 views
-
- 35 replies
- 7,603 views
-
- 0 replies
- 586 views
-
-
Who's Online 13 Members, 1 Anonymous, 70 Guests (See full list)
-
Images
-
Tell a friend
-
What's going on Mean Green?
-
1
1977 interview with Bill Blakeley
If somebody here knows where I can buy a vintage dress shirt exactly like the one Bill Blakeley is wearing, please post the link here. Love the crowd at the Super Pit for the SMU game. Wow! Looks like pack the Pit night worked back then. -
5
I seem to recall…
Why not pick a player and have him do a promotion for a business or a non-profit or a specific group like animal rescue. That way, the player gets the money and the non-profit or business gets done exposure as well. Isn’t that what NIL was originally intended to do ? -
5
I seem to recall…
I haven't acted on this to this point but was inspired by @SUMG 's suggestion. I am considering donating to sport specific NIL's that would allow me to designate any money donated to players in sports that aren't getting a full ride scholarship. Not thinking of or excluding walk on players but instead partial scholarship players. Not directly related but see the attached blog that discusses proposed increases in scholarship and roster limits across the NCAA sport spectrum, starting in the 2025-26 school year. Not sure how NT will respond if these proposals are adopted but it would most obviously affect Olympic sport rosters at universities that don't increase their scholarship limits, NIL or not. NCAA Scholarship and Roster Limits: Key Changes Explained GMG- 1
-
-
5
I seem to recall…
That is just naivety on your part... The most ridiculous thing I ever read from people that were for NIL before it was initiated was hearing/reading people (on here and nationally) literally claiming they can't even afford toothpaste to brush their teeth. People fell for that and the like. It was ALWAYS about trying to get what people deemed to be from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (black kids) money. Or is honesty still taboo? Nevertheless, the attorneys were for it because it gave them cases. The sports media was for it because it gave them stories. The sports industry was for it because it gave them business. The minority of fans that were for it, the people who largely fund this garbage, are wholesale not for it any longer. But now, it's bigger than even them. -
11
Great NIL take from Sark
That strikes me as an odd grouping. Thanks for the article. It clears up a lot of things for me. Although I don't think this case will resolve much.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
.jpg.2c34139d28f511fc91b929fa21c6b081.thumb.jpg.34e326535d3dc1a502adf551cec2bd5a.jpg)
-
5
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Most Points
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Biggest Gamblers
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.