Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Excuse me, should have read Apologizes in title.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/nbc-issues-apology-on-zimmerman-tape-screw-up/2012/04/03/gIQA8m5jtS_blog.html

..."NBC has completed its investigation into the mishandling of the police dispatcher’s conversation with George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin case. And the process ends with a finding of error, plus an apology....."

Rick

Edited by FirefightnRick
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted

"It started off boring and slow with Not Sure trying to B.S. everyone with a bunch of smart talk. "Blah, blah, blah. You gotta believe me!' That part of the trial sucked! But then the Chief J. just went off. He said 'Man, whatever! The guy's guilty as s&!+! We all know that.' And he sentenced his a$$ to one night of rehabilitation."

  • Upvote 2
Posted

And there was a time in this country, a long time ago, when reading wasn't just for fags and neither was writing. People wrote books and movies, movies that had stories so you cared whose ass it was and why it was farting, and I believe that time can come again!

  • Upvote 3
Posted

Excuse me, should have read Apologizes in title.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/nbc-issues-apology-on-zimmerman-tape-screw-up/2012/04/03/gIQA8m5jtS_blog.html

..."NBC has completed its investigation into the mishandling of the police dispatcher’s conversation with George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin case. And the process ends with a finding of error, plus an apology....."

Rick

So they determined that there was "an error made in the production process." Yeah, right. It wasn't a "process" problem. It was edited..by a human. It was deliberate and intentionally and no doubtedly reviewed and approved by several layers of NBC editorial management because it made for a better narrative. It fanned the flames. NBC should be ashamed. What NBC did was equivalent to yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.

Keith

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

--- O ... I wondered where the L it was.

.

Edited by SCREAMING EAGLE-66
Posted

Dude pretty clearly states "f--king coons" on the 9-1-1 call. I don't understand why they'd need to edit it to paint any sort of picture or create any kind of agenda.

And that couldn't have been edited as well?

Just playing Devil's advocate here.

Posted

And that couldn't have been edited as well?

Just playing Devil's advocate here.

It is one of those things where you hear what you want, did he say "goons" or "coons" apparently it depends on which side of the aisle you sit.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted

It is one of those things where you hear what you want, did he say "goons" or "coons" apparently it depends on which side of the aisle you sit.

Goons? Really? I guess i haven't been paying much attention lately but... goons? Thats just silly.

Posted

I thought we tied a bow on things when it was determined Zimmerman had no injuries consistent with his story that he got his ass whipped by a 17 year old. No? Still trying to defend him?

See you still believe everything you see on the news. Bravo :goodjob:

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 4
Posted

See you still believe everything you see on the news. Bravo :goodjob:

Actually, I simply haven't been paying a lick of attention...I stopped caring about "whys" after Zimmerman shot a kid. I really don't need much more than that.

  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 3
Posted (edited)

I thought we tied a bow on things when it was determined Zimmerman had no injuries consistent with his story that he got his ass whipped by a 17 year old. No? Still trying to defend him?

Injuries were always documented in police reports, but some ASSUMED the police lied (for what reason, they only know in their fantasy world) in those reports when a grainy video came out in which head wounds could not be clearly made out.

Of course those same people simply moved on to the "forensic voice specialist" when an enhanced version of that same video showed said head injuries.

Of course when they moved on to the "forensic voice specialist", they chose to believe science so flimsy that it isn't admissible in any court over an unbiased eyewitness who saw Zimmerman getting beaten and saw Zimmerman yelling for help. Yes, physically saw it.

I'll return to the oh so appropriate movie quotes now.

Edited by UNT90
Posted (edited)

Actually, I simply haven't been paying a lick of attention...I stopped caring about "whys" after Zimmerman shot a kid. I really don't need much more than that.

It seems like you're in a big boat with people who have no concern about hearing all the facts or knowing what the law says.

Edited by Mean Green 93-98
  • Upvote 1
Posted

I guess some of us have morals, and don't look for legal excuses to justify murder.

/end GMG facts debate

/Begin discussion

if defintion of murder

then continue

else

debate about self defense

....

something like that. I haven't coded in 10+ years.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.