Jump to content

UNT System to adopt at-will policy

Skipper
 Share

Recommended Posts

Skipper Enthusiast

Skipper

Posted
Posted

Valerie Gonzalez / Assigning Editor After four months of considering a move to at-will employment, UNT Chancellor Lee Jackson announced an adoption of the policy in a staff-wide email sent out March 20. The adoption of the at-will policy will allow institutions of the UNT System to fire staff employees for any reason that is not illegal­­ –– which federal and state laws describe as age, race, sex, disability, religion and national origin. “Effective June 1, all current and future employees within the UNT System, except faculty and individuals under contract, serve at-will,†Jackson wrote in the email. While the [...]

View the full article

  • Upvote 1
KRAM1 Rookie

KRAM1

Posted
Posted

Works for me. I am very much in favor of this move. Should also be done in all federal, state and local governments, school districts, etc,., etc. And each and every state in the nation should adopt "at will" work policies for their citizens. Hey, just my opinion...if you are a labor union guy you will probably disagree...

  • Downvote 1
Harry Grand Master

Harry

Posted
Posted

Government agencies should be required to justify why they're firing people. We all wanted answers when President Bataille was dumped.

I disagree with this opinion rcade. Why should the government employee be treated any differently than those in the private sector? This policy hampers UNT in hiring and retaining the best and brightest - if someone isn't doing their job they basically cannot be fired. There was a time when the compensation differences for working in the government vs. the private sector made this type of policy more reasonable. However, with the financial meltdown and this ailing economy we have reached a point where the government employee has more stability, is being paid more and receives more retirement security than the private sector. These are employees being paid through the taxes generated from the private sector. I have a problem with that.

rcade Veteran

rcade

Posted
Posted

I disagree with this opinion rcade. Why should the government employee be treated any differently than those in the private sector?

Because the government employee is accountable to the public.

I agree with you there are drawbacks to not letting people be fired at will. But in general, I'd like to know that when somebody is fired from a government job the decision has to be justified.

  • Upvote 2
GL2Greatness Newbie

GL2Greatness

Posted
Posted

Government agencies should be required to justify why they're firing people. We all wanted answers when President Bataille was dumped.

why should a government job be a job for life

if there is no need for your position or your position needs to be cut because of budget cuts then you should be let go....what more explanation does someone need just because they work for the government why should they not be subjected to being let go if there is not a need for them any longer

and if they violated a rule of employment that would be explained to them when they are let go just like anywhere else

and for those that know what was going on and that were able to read the available information we know why Dr. b was let go.....because she wanted to run the university as a president should and she did not want to let the idiot lee jackson run the university which is not the job of a chancellor in Texas

she wanted to raise tuition and lee did not and when she took it to the BOR he got mad

she wanted to stop the Denton campus from subsidizing the UCD and other dallas economic development projects and lee wanted to continue to use the Denton campus as a city of dallas economic development slush fund

she wanted to be informed when things were being taken from the Denton campus and she wanted a say in that and the idiot lee wanted to move it all to dallas to benefit his friends and associates and she resented that and questioned it

so lee the idiot fired her

  • Upvote 1
rcade Veteran

rcade

Posted
Posted

why should a government job be a job for life

I never said that it should.

and for those that know what was going on and that were able to read the available information we know why Dr. b was let go.....because she wanted to run the university as a president should and she did not want to let the idiot lee jackson run the university which is not the job of a chancellor in Texas

Given all of that, do you think UNT would have been served by a rule that let Jackson fire her for no reason? I'd like to think there's a nice paper trail at UNT describing everything that went down when she was shown the door, and the Board of Regents and others can review it.

  • Upvote 2
meangreendork Enthusiast

meangreendork

Posted
Posted

Have any of you actually read the new policy? It's basically a softened version of the private sector's policy. Instead of the private sector's insta-fire, this one requires some review process and has appeals built into it. I think it's better than the old "you gotta commit murder to get fired" system and it's better than the private sector's, "good morning, by the way, you're fired" system.

  • Upvote 1
GL2Greatness Newbie

GL2Greatness

Posted
Posted (edited)

I never said that it should.

Given all of that, do you think UNT would have been served by a rule that let Jackson fire her for no reason? I'd like to think there's a nice paper trail at UNT describing everything that went down when she was shown the door, and the Board of Regents and others can review it.

well you are missing out on the very large fact that UNT did not have the "at will" policy in place when she was fired.....and she was really not "fired" per say anyway she was made uncomfortable enough and compensated enough that she walked away

so even with the former policy in place and before the "at will" policy was in place what you are concerned about already happened and it happened to the highest official of the university.....so really the policy that you favor was already a failure and really it is only an avenue for stupid lawsuits from lower level employees that will not be bought out to step away

again if there is a budget cut there is no need for a huge drawn out "why you are being let go" pity party and if someone is let go because of some unjust factor there are plenty of rules, laws, government agencies, and shyster lawyers in place to handle their potential issue just like the fool professor with the big chief tablet legal filing at the south dallas flagship campus......and of course since her "case" was junk it was tossed....even before the "at will" policy was in place.....which shows again that even idiots with ZERO actual legal issues for their firing will get their day in court of they desire one so there is no need for a complex system of giving a big long explanation and justification to everyone that is let go for any reason

there are plenty of state and federal laws dealing with employment there does not need to be special university specific policies in place to justify why someone is being let go

hell UNT could not even fire a provost making well into the 6 figures for blatant plagiarizing so I don't think there is a rash of unjust firings going on around UNT that anyone needs to be protected from and if there are as shown by the big chief legal filing they will get their day in court even if they get tossed right back out for being wrong

Edited by GL2Greatness
Monkeypox Mentor

Monkeypox

Posted
Posted

As it is, and trust me as a person who has hired and fired in both the public and private sector, and has to interview and train people. With or without this policy, it's a PITA the fire, find, interview, hire, and train new people - so much so, that in BOTH sectors you put up with more incompetent asshats that need firing than you should.

  • Upvote 1
The Fake Lonnie Finch Newbie

The Fake Lonnie Finch

Posted
Posted

As it is, and trust me as a person who has hired and fired in both the public and private sector, and has to interview and train people. With or without this policy, it's a PITA the fire, find, interview, hire, and train new people - so much so, that in BOTH sectors you put up with more incompetent asshats that need firing than you should.

Agreed. I never understood this until I was in the position of having to hire and manage. Your hands are tied on what you can ask candidates. It makes for an uncomfortable interview process because you never really get to know the candidate.

So, when you hire one whose personal life is constantly pulling them out of their job and screwing up your company, you have to walk on eggshells and document to the moon to be able to get rid of them.

To me, At-Will is simply a give back: You can't totally qualify someone up front without threat of discrimination, so we give you a pass on the backside if the hire is screwed up.

oldguystudent Newbie

oldguystudent

Posted
Posted

So it says, "Faculty under contract." What does it mean for the future of tenure? Two good reasons that professors should be allowed tenure, even with some of the crappiest faculty members I've met in my life hanging out in crevices.

1) Academic freedom. You don't become Tier 1 by forcing your faculty to come up with research topics and results that agree with the opinions of the regents, the general public, or your average Mean Green Football fan. Sometimes you even breed the occasional Timothy Leary or Ted Kaczynski. Other times, you breed Nobel laureates.

2) See #1 and tell me how UNT would attract any decent faculty in the future if it's a true at-will employment policy that would guarantee nothing?

Out there in the real working without a net world, they give you contracts, but tenure is an implied lifetime contract. You give me opportunity at Arlington and Denton, one has tenure, one has at-will, guess where I'm headed.

KRAM1 Rookie

KRAM1

Posted
Posted

Because the government employee is accountable to the public.

I agree with you there are drawbacks to not letting people be fired at will. But in general, I'd like to know that when somebody is fired from a government job the decision has to be justified.

It shouldn't have to be justified to you.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
KRAM1 Rookie

KRAM1

Posted
Posted

Out there in the real working without a net world, they give you contracts, but tenure is an implied lifetime contract. You give me opportunity at Arlington and Denton, one has tenure, one has at-will, guess where I'm headed.

Where and why? So, some "guarantee" of lifetime employment is the only factor? I think that is perhaps one factor, but the only one? Seems to me that any good employee, hard working employee including profs and teachers should have enough self-confidence to not need the guarantee...sure, in the academic world there probably should be some safeguards regaring academic freedom, but one's quality and quantity of work should be the determining factor, yes?

  • Downvote 2
GL2Greatness Newbie

GL2Greatness

Posted
Posted

So it says, "Faculty under contract." What does it mean for the future of tenure? Two good reasons that professors should be allowed tenure, even with some of the crappiest faculty members I've met in my life hanging out in crevices.

1) Academic freedom. You don't become Tier 1 by forcing your faculty to come up with research topics and results that agree with the opinions of the regents, the general public, or your average Mean Green Football fan. Sometimes you even breed the occasional Timothy Leary or Ted Kaczynski. Other times, you breed Nobel laureates.

2) See #1 and tell me how UNT would attract any decent faculty in the future if it's a true at-will employment policy that would guarantee nothing?

Out there in the real working without a net world, they give you contracts, but tenure is an implied lifetime contract. You give me opportunity at Arlington and Denton, one has tenure, one has at-will, guess where I'm headed.

actually this is what it says

“Effective June 1, all current and future employees within the UNT System, except faculty and individuals under contract, serve at-will,” Jackson wrote in the email.

so it exempts faculty and it exempts others that are under individual contracts....you were not reading what it said correctly

and usually faculty that are not tenured are under some type of contract and or tenure track agreement that spells out the time period they have to try and obtain tenure before their employment goes under review

usually it is 3 to 4 years to gain tenure or to go for a tenure review and than subsequent to the results of that tenure review you are either tenured, you are given an extended period of time to undergo a second tenure review, or you are given a year or so to find a new job and wrap up your affairs at the current university....in some cases you might be retained and not given a second chance to go for tenure and then you would be given contracts usually 3 years in length or so subject to renewal

Monkeypox Mentor

Monkeypox

Posted
Posted

actually this is what it says

“Effective June 1, all current and future employees within the UNT System, except faculty and individuals under contract, serve at-will,” Jackson wrote in the email.

so it exempts faculty and it exempts others that are under individual contracts....you were not reading what it said correctly

and usually faculty that are not tenured are under some type of contract and or tenure track agreement that spells out the time period they have to try and obtain tenure before their employment goes under review

usually it is 3 to 4 years to gain tenure or to go for a tenure review and than subsequent to the results of that tenure review you are either tenured, you are given an extended period of time to undergo a second tenure review, or you are given a year or so to find a new job and wrap up your affairs at the current university....in some cases you might be retained and not given a second chance to go for tenure and then you would be given contracts usually 3 years in length or so subject to renewal

Exactly. And in a number of cases, tenure TRACK employees are actually at-will(depending on terms of contracts, obviously). At-will is a default.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 10

      Cotton, Vice And Mason

      Not being capable and not being given a legitimate opportunity are two different things. Moore never got a legitimate chance in my opinion. I don't think Taylor would have been given a legitimate chance either just like I don't believe Vice, Cotton, and Mason are being given legitimate opportunities to showcase themselves. We had a 20 point lead the entire second have against Evansville. They couldn't get in for 5-10 minutes with the members of the main rotation to see how they perform? Would be nice to know what we have if a main player goes down...
      GMG_Dallas in Mean Green Basketball
    2. 13

      The Band

      Before adding my thoughts, I have some questions about the band that maybe current or former band members or someone in the know can answer. 1. Who gets to be in the band? Is it an open try out or only available to students in the school of music? Is there a try out at all? 2. Do band members have to pay for (or rent) their uniforms or are they provided by the school? 3. Do they play their own personal instruments or are these provided by the school? 4. Where does any funding required for the band come from (Athletic Department, School of Music, somewhere else)? 5. Do band members receive any credits (elective or otherwise) for being in the band of it is purely voluntary? 6. What (if any) is the relationship between the Green Brigade and the pep band that plays at basketball games?
      keith in Mean Green Football
    3. 0

      UNT Basketball Beats Oregon State, 58-55

      DENTON – Atin Wright hit a game-winning 3-pointer with seven seconds remaining as the UNT men’s basketball team defeated Oregon State 58-55 at the Super Pit on Monday night. Three North Texas (5-1) players finished with double-digit point totals as the Mean Green remained undefeated at home this season. Latrell Jossell finished with a season and game-high 15 points. Brenen Lorient scored a career-high 14 points, extending his streak of double-digit point games to three. UNT has now beaten two high-major teams this regular season — they defeated Minnesota 54-51 on Nov. 13. It’s the first time they’ve accomplished that since the 2010-11 season when they beat Texas Tech and LSU in the same year during the regular season. The Mean Green continued to be one of the most efficient defensive teams in the country, forcing 22 Beavers turnovers, UNT’s highest total since Nov. 26, 2020 when the Mean Green defeated Mississippi Valley State 116-62 at home. "Our ability to turn them over 22 times in a one-possession game was the separator," head coach Ross Hodge said. " That's a really good team that can really shoot. We talked about it in one of the [media timeouts] that we were going to really have to string together some of our best defensive possessions and I thought that group in the second half was really good." North Texas took a close 26-25 lead into the locker room at halftime. Oregon State (4-2) came out hot to begin the second half and held the lead until the 5:38 mark. 13 of the Beavers’ 22 turnovers came in the second half, ultimately leading to the Mean Green’s close victory. North Texas travels to Kissimmee, Fla. to take on Northern Iowa on Thursday at 7 p.m. CT for their first game of the NIT Season Tip-Off. For more information on UNT Basketball tickets, contact the Mean Green Ticket Office at 940-565-2527 or at ticketoffice@unt.edu. Fans can purchase tickets at www.meangreentickets.com or visit the UNT Athletics Ticket Office located at Gate 2 of DATCU Stadium between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.
      Dannymacfan in Mean Green Basketball
    4. 13

      The Band

      high school band director was a mistake. band has regressed. drumline is abysmal, no confidence, no arrogance, no true talent. last 2 years the drumline has been the worst since the 80s. need to drop that best damn band in the land and best drumline in college football....not even close to being true.
      • 2
      • Upvote
      THOR in Mean Green Football
    5. 10

      24/25 MBB Attendance Tracker

      We are starting to cut into the deficit created by the first game compared to last year. Now only down 8.72% in terms of average attendance. Last night was the highest game 4 attendance of the last four years, but to be honest, I was a little disappointed it was only 3,292 for a "name" opponent (yes, even during Thanksgiving week). November 25 was our earliest game 4, but a much stronger opponent. The previous 3 years it was 12/4 (LSU Shreveport), 12/3 (Omaha) and 12/2 (Miss Valley State) respectively. I mentioned this during the in-game thread, but the ESPN+ broadcast sounds like the commentators are off site in a soundproof room or something. Not hearing the crowd noise and the excitement in the arena really detracts from the game experience. Need a better audio production. I switched to the radio stream and it was much better from that perspective.
      keith in Mean Green Basketball

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,480
    • Most Online
      1,865
    meangreen0015
    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined

  • Most Points

    1. 1
      El Paso Eagle
      El Paso Eagle
      167,054
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      130,493
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      128,575
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      118,840
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      105,184

  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,589,381
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,156,819
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      779,763
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
      SteaminWillieBeamin
    7. 7
      cousin oliver
      cousin oliver
      448,120
    8. 8
      meangreenfaninno
    9. 9
      South Texas Green
    10. 10
      outoftown
      outoftown
      314,541

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.