Jump to content

It looks like UTEP is heading West..Merger thoughts


Harry

Recommended Posts

You can hear it here:

Basically, its the same theme that we have heard from their AD Bob Stull, ie that they look forward to rekindling their rivalries with New Mexico etc...

So -- given that - and assuming Air Force stays in - it would appear you would have 9 MWC teams (Air Force, Fresno, CSU, Wyoming, New Mexico, UTEP, UNLV, Nevada, Hawaii)

and 7 on the CUSA east side (Southern Miss, ECU, Marshall, Tulsa, Tulane, UAB, Rice)

This means you would add two to the east side to get to 9 and 9 or 18 teams total. That means 8 conference games and 4 non-conference.

The usual suspects show up on the east side. Temple could be a good football only to offset Hawaii in the west. But Temple may be holding out for a Big East invite and might not be a long term solution. FIU (TV market, academics), North Texas (TV market, facilities), UTSA (TV market), La. Tech (FB program) are probably all in the mix and with Memphis leaving I think MTSU has to be considered, ASU hired Malzahn, WKU brings basketball and improving football...I could go on and on here but you get the point. We have six months of political and public scrutiny to look forward to but in the end I see the TV consultants driving the decision.

But let's not forget about the west, what about Utah State and San Jose? USU brings good basketball and San Jose has a good TV market. Will the new conference decide to kill the WAC? Do they want the blood on their hands?

The Alliance is in an interesting position because they have the ability to kill the WAC and severely cripple the Sun Belt if they choose to expand in a big way. At the same time many of their fans are screaming out for keeping it small to exclude the schools perceived to be below them. Right now the East side has 7 teams, if they wanted to get to 24 they could poach as many as 5 Sun Belt schools which may not kill the Sun Belt but would severely damage it and probably require a merger with the remaining WAC leftovers.

Should be an interesting 6 months...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for North Texas a 24 team league is the best situation. I think we'd be in the league but would also get some good regional rivals b/c La Tech, Ark State or somebody else would probably be grouped with Tulsa, Rice and UNT.

At 18, I just think we get left behind w/ Temple and FIU going (FIU keeps getting thrown out there so I guess they are favorite). It wouldn't be end of world b/c Sun Belt could pickup La Tech and UTSA (or some other schools) so we'd get some closer rivals. The Sun Belt wouldn't be too far behind the new conference in on the field performance.

I just don't want to see 20-22 teams added and North Texas getting left out. That means best of Sun Belt is gone and we are left behind with Sun Belt and WAC scraps. I feel good at 22 but 20 scares me a little because you never know exactly what the new league will be thinking.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I predicted 24 teams in another thread. I read somewhere this "conference" has no intention of cross divisional games, thus giving some ease to the worries of a huge footprint. If TV contracts are as big a driver as we are lead to believe, I think the 2 divisions will try to establish themselves in as many big markets as possible (for money & viability). Maybe they wish to send this Super Conference Champ to a "Big Bowl"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best scenario for UNT is a 20 team league..

2 divisions of 10

2 pods of 5

play everyone in your pod, (4 games) play 3 rotating games in you division(7 games), 1 game out of your division (8), and then 1 game with the corresponding ranked team in the opposing division, giving home field to the team with the best BCS number (9).

That gives you 9 conf games, 3 OOC and still the potential of the winners of the #1 in the last week of the season to play in the title game.

You could do the same with 24/12/6, but the numbers get a little crazy.. But pods in general would be great for UNT. We would either be in a pod with Rice, Tulsa and teams in LA or a pod with Tulsa, UTEP and the range schools. Hard to see us not having a pod with a team that is close to eventually form a rivalry with.

I like this idea a lot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.