Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Forgive me if this topic has been beaten to death, I haven't been able to jump on here much lately. But why is Rainey and Morris at this game and Dunbar gets shafted?

Politics and we had an under .500 record, too.

And many times it has to do if a player's school's athletic staff did their job. When Gil Brandt used to be one of the player selectors for this game, knowing Gil was an advantage.

GMG!

Posted

Ridiculous that he is not included in either of these games or that he jas yet to be invited to the Combine. Someone will get one hell of a back, and I hope he plays with a chip on his shoulder. Sorry, but he's better than Rainey or Morris.

Stop blaming the AD when you have no proof of what they did or didn't do.

Posted

Senior Bowl Officals, Scouts, other professional football Officials, Agents(to a certain extent)are the ones determining participants not the players college administation. Pretty much the same thing in regards to the combine. For a player to be invited to a Senior Bowl or the Combine, there has to be significant interest in said college player from officials associated with the professional leagues.

Posted

I understand why he's not playing in the senior bowl, but I'd be stunned if he isn't invited to the combine. If he does get invited to the combine, his stock will skyrocket, because he'll dominate everything they do there.

Posted

I understand why he's not playing in the senior bowl, but I'd be stunned if he isn't invited to the combine. If he does get invited to the combine, his stock will skyrocket, because he'll dominate everything they do there.

Combine is all about numbers (40 times, etc..). Not Lance's strong suit. He would not dominate anything there.

Lance will probably have to make his way a la PC, unfortunately. All PC did was lead the nation in rushing. What did that get him on draft day? Nothing. NFL scouts are obsessed with measurables, which don't highlight Lance's talents.

Unfortunate, but true.

Posted

I think some of you watched Dunbar through some green tinted glasses this year. He's a good back, and I understand the OL issues, but Rainey and Morris looked better this year in my opinion.

Posted

Combine is all about numbers (40 times, etc..). Not Lance's strong suit. He would not dominate anything there.

Lance will probably have to make his way a la PC, unfortunately. All PC did was lead the nation in rushing. What did that get him on draft day? Nothing. NFL scouts are obsessed with measurables, which don't highlight Lance's talents.

Unfortunate, but true.

That's where you're wrong, sir. His 40 and shuttle times will be among the best of all the RBs, and that is a guarantee.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 24

      Stop Blaming Athletes and the NCAA for Ruining College Football

    2. 13

      Vito kicking UNT in the nuts again

    3. 25
    4. 13

      Vito kicking UNT in the nuts again

    5. 0

      2025 Projected Depth Chart

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,505
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined
  • Most Points

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      136,993
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      130,960
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      123,785
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      108,904
  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,591,107
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,480,984
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      841,161
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
    7. 7
    8. 8
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      389,039
    9. 9
    10. 10
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.