9/28: ESPN Bottom 10

[jperg2]

9/28: ESPN Bottom 10

[MDH]

WKU should be on there instead of MUTS.

[akriesman]

WKU should be on there instead of MUTS.

I am shocked that Indiana is not in the bottom 10. If we didn't melt down in the last 11 minutes of the game, they surely would have been (and we would not be on the waiting list). Oh well, a win is a win.

And yes, WKU should be on the list instead of MUTS.

Edited September 28, 2011 by akriesman

[UNTflyer]

I thought a win got you off the waiting list as well.

[Army of Dad]

I thought a win got you off the waiting list as well.

Maybe two wins are needed...

[northtexasfrog]

Agreed with "Army" above.

[golfingomez]

I think we should win 6 games this year... just to assure ourselves we aren't on the list anymore

[Lurker]

I am shocked that Indiana is not in the bottom 10. If we didn't melt down in the last 11 minutes of the game, they surely would have been (and we would not be on the waiting list). Oh well, a win is a win.

And yes, WKU should be on the list instead of MUTS.

Agreed. Indiana was on the waiting list last week. He must be contractually obligated to limit AQ conference teams on the list. It hurts the ESPN sponsored monopoly on college football money.

[greenminer]

I was actually pleasantly surprised:

Only 2 Belt teams, and 3 AQ teams.

We had times where it seemed like UNT, F_U, NMSU, LaMo, and LaLa were seasonal residents.

Memphis is looking terrible this year, and UNM has just lost its wheels.

[Green92]

Remember, this is not a real ranking.

[UNTflyer]

Remember, this is not a real ranking.