Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, at the time that KRAM1 was attending college as an undergrad, A$M didn't have co-eds. At that time it was still an all male school.

A&M went co-ed in 1963 along with changing from college to university.

Posted

Well, at the time that KRAM1 was attending college as an undergrad, A$M didn't have co-eds. At that time it was still an all male school.

Well, now that makes the situation a little odd, doesn't it?

Posted

Looks like A&M is now a laughing stock.

https://twitter.com/#!/schadjoe

BREAKING: UF's Bernie Machen statement says no action on A&M; satisfied with present alignment; for now

http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/gatorbytes/2011/08/14/sec-presidents-chancellors-say-theyre-satisfied-with-12-school-membership/

“The SEC Presidents and Chancellors met today and reaffirmed our satisfaction with the present 12 institutional alignment. We recognize, however, that future conditions may make it advantageous to expand the number of institutions in the league. We discussed criteria and process associated with expansion. No action was taken with respect to any institution including Texas A&M.”
Posted

espn reports that the sec doesn't want atm now....hmmmm....can't wait for the future big 12 meetings...awkward!

I really think this is good for us. The conferences will blow up one of these days and its better for UNT if it's a couple or more years down the road.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

espn reports that the sec doesn't want atm now....hmmmm....can't wait for the future big 12 meetings...awkward!

To be accurate, it's only that there won't be an invitation right now. Doesn't mean they don't want them, just not at this time. My guess is they have to line up other teams as well. This has all happened super quick.

Posted

Something tells me that the early espn reports were done on purpose to make a&m looks silly and the bad guy here. I'm not a big fan of espn after what they did with the whole Mike Leach saga

Posted

To be accurate, it's only that there won't be an invitation right now. Doesn't mean they don't want them, just not at this time. My guess is they have to line up other teams as well. This has all happened super quick.

To make the invite legal, A&M has to officially apply for membership. This the purpose of the meeting tomorrow. Coincidentally, SEC folk meet again on Wednesday.

After A&M regents give Loftin the power to deal on Monday, and A&M goes before Oklahoma City University and SMU grad Dan Branch's bogus hearing (what Branch aims to accomplish is beyond me. The academics of the schools in the A&M system will be fine no matter which conference the main campus is in. Branch is just stalling), SEC will probably say Wednesday that they have a formal request from A&M.

Then, the hunt for school #14 will be on in earnest.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

We'd be insane NOT to accept an offer to be in the same conference as Texas, even if it's just for a couple of seasons. Depending on who would still remain in the Big 12, we'd be guaranteed to have some top football teams coming to Denton. Texas, OU, Texas Tech, OSU....I'd love to host games against any and all of those opponents. Plus, we'd have more television exposure than we've had in the last 20 years. Tech has benefited a great deal from riding UT's coattails - no reason why we couldn't do the same.

Hindsight is still 20/20, but we (still) should have built Apogee larger initially because IMO it would be easier to advance upward and be taken more serious if the Big Boys knew that was our intentions from the git-go. 30,000 and some change says we are pretty comfy' where we are.

Posted

Something tells me that the early espn reports were done on purpose to make a&m looks silly and the bad guy here. I'm not a big fan of espn after what they did with the whole Mike Leach saga

You're probably right, but I'm pretty sure that A&M brought majority of this on themselves.

Surely there was some sort of talks with the SEC (and hopefully there was some sort of invite) right? If not, then it only reinforces the Aggie stereotypes.

It would be like one of us getting upset with our jobs because the "team lead" just ahead of us, that we're obsessed with hating, is getting his own column in the company newsletter, then causing a scene while storming out of the office to go work for the bigger competitor, only to find that the bigger competitor is not hiring.

What would be sad is if the SEC said they wanted A&M, then changed their mind...

Posted

Something tells me that the early espn reports were done on purpose to make a&m looks silly and the bad guy here. I'm not a big fan of espn after what they did with the whole Mike Leach saga

Maybe but not likely. In the end we know A&M is going to the SEC. For legal purposes the SEC is just playing it safe for now. the inevitable is going to happen sooner or later.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.