Jump to content

Realtime Rpi Now Projection .............................


Recommended Posts

Posted

They are missing two conference games...

RealtimeRPI lists as 23-4 (14-2). Kenpom failed rudimentary math and has us at 23-6 (12-4) yet only shows 2 conference losses (@WKU & @ASU).

Posted

RealtimeRPI lists as 23-4 (14-2). Kenpom failed rudimentary math and has us at 23-6 (12-4) yet only shows 2 conference losses (@WKU & @ASU).

KenPom usually states that his record and game projections don't always match because he computes what the full record should be on his models and then game by game matchups separate from each other.

Posted

KenPom usually states that his record and game projections don't always match because he computes what the full record should be on his models and then game by game matchups separate from each other.

Wouldn't it be easier if he just did all the game by game matchups and added up the record?

I can make him an excel spreadsheet for that if he needs one. <_<

Posted

Wouldn't it be easier if he just did all the game by game matchups and added up the record?

I can make him an excel spreadsheet for that if he needs one. <_<

Were you a DSCI student or something?

Posted

Haha, no. I took a couple DSCI classes for my business degree though. I just really like spreadsheets, and data (I'm a sports nerd), so maybe I should have been one. :unsure:

I hated stats as a BCIS major. :fpc:

Posted

Wouldn't it be easier if he just did all the game by game matchups and added up the record?

I can make him an excel spreadsheet for that if he needs one. <_<

I think because he assigns percentages he calculates if a team is projected to win several 55/45 or 60/40 types of games -- odds are they will drop one or two over time.

Posted (edited)

Pomeroy does cumulative probabilities. If you have a 90% likelihood of winning each of the 16 individual conference games, you've only got a 18.5% chance at actually going undefeated through all of them.

His predictive model gives a probability for each individual game then a collective estimate based on those individual probabilities. If his model predicts you as a 51% favorite in 16 games, he's not actually projecting you to go 16-0. He's projecting you to go 8-8 or (maybe) 9-7.

That's why there's a discrepancy. It's also why people shouldn't crap themselves when we lose to a team once or twice a year that we're "better than".

Edited by TheTastyGreek
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.