Jump to content

Shouldnt Dignity Alone Prevent This?

emmitt01

By emmitt01
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

The Fake Lonnie Finch Newbie

The Fake Lonnie Finch

Posted
Posted

Dignity? Texas?

This was the $120 million dollar program that held Iowa State, Kansas State, Kansas, and Baylor over a barrel for their bowl money last summer in their threat to break up the Big 12.

Over and over and over again...Screw Texas. Screw the Big 12. Screw the "traditional powers" that keep milking the system whether they win, lose, or draw.

There's not a shred of dignity or integrity within the athletic department at UT. I guarantee you they'd take a bowl bid at 5-7...with Mack Brown mumbling his putrid crap all the way to the bank. They shamelessly whine and manipulate even when they are winning. A little losing won't humble those money-grubbing maggots.

  • Upvote 8
  • Downvote 2
Rudy Grand Master

Rudy

Posted
Posted

Dignity? Texas?

This was the $120 million dollar program that held Iowa State, Kansas State, Kansas, and Baylor over a barrel for their bowl money last summer in their threat to break up the Big 12.

Over and over and over again...Screw Texas. Screw the Big 12. Screw the "traditional powers" that keep milking the system whether they win, lose, or draw.

There's not a shred of dignity or integrity within the athletic department at UT. I guarantee you they'd take a bowl bid at 5-7...with Mack Brown mumbling his putrid crap all the way to the bank. They shamelessly whine and manipulate even when they are winning. A little losing won't humble those money-grubbing maggots.

TFLF, according to some, you just have penis envy of texas.

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 7
Quoner Veteran

Quoner

Posted
Posted

TFLF, according to some, you just have penis envy of texas.

Nope...he used logic and reason to make a point and articulated it really well. Sometimes it's all in how you say it, my good man.

Regardless, since were all on the same side here, here's what needs to happen to make sure Texas is home -- and more importantly, not practicing -- for the holidays. From ESPN Dallas:

What it means for Texas: Texas will most likely be home for the holidays for the first time since 1997. There are 64 bowl-eligible teams in America, and 70 slots for bowl teams. Eleven more teams will play over the weekend to achieve bowl eligibility. Want to keep an eye on your fate, Longhorns? Here are the remaining teams playing for bowl eligibility this week: Colorado, Louisville, Houston, Western Michigan, Oregon State, California, Tennessee, Georgia, Troy, Florida International and Louisiana-Monroe. Six of those teams must win to keep a 5-7 team from playing in a bowl.

Well look at that, the Belt will actually have a big say in this.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 2
Rudy Grand Master

Rudy

Posted
Posted

Nope...he used logic and reason to make a point and articulated it really well. Sometimes it's all in how you say it, my good man.

My statement was a shot at those on the board who get their taint bruised at the very mention of a negative tu comment. I agree wholeheartedly with him.

  • Downvote 8
PlummMeanGreen Grand Master

PlummMeanGreen

Posted
Posted

There is little dignity where $$$ is involved. Texas may be a whore but I'd hesitate to trash the Big XII. We might some day be considered for that conference so let's not get everyone PO'ed.

And Jack when that day comes, we'll both be playing our angelic harpist version of Glory to the Green.

I just don't know what shade of green I want my heavenly cloud to be just yet; who knows, might run a poll on GMG.com to get some ideas, but I know that, too, would probaby end in a stalemate. :lol:

GMG!

MeanMag Rising Star

MeanMag

Posted
Posted (edited)

My statement was a shot at those on the board who get their taint bruised at the very mention of a negative tu comment. I agree wholeheartedly with him.

Oh Rudy, you're hilarious.

TFLF made a great post. So did Emmitt. +1s for you two.

UT (the program) might make some money off of going to a bowl game, but I highly doubt they'll sniff the amount of whatever a bowl game might make off of them. The real money grubbers are the bowl games. Bowl presidents have already petitioned the NCAA to let 5-7 teams go, because of instances like this. UT and it's fans have so much money to spend, that a bowl game would have them if they were 0fers this year. You'll continue to see Mack Brown push for a bowl invite for his team, because his contract, his coaches contracts and probably the ADs contract have bonuses tied to bowl appearances.

So on top of NT91s well delivered "F Ohio St", I'd like to add, F the BCS and all of the Bowl Games for milking these academic institutions and amateur athletes for all their worth and F the NCAA for letting it happen and not restoring the integrity to post season play.

Edited by MeanMag
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
houstonmeangreen Newbie

houstonmeangreen

Posted
Posted

Dignity? Texas?

This was the $120 million dollar program that held Iowa State, Kansas State, Kansas, and Baylor over a barrel for their bowl money last summer in their threat to break up the Big 12.

Over and over and over again...Screw Texas. Screw the Big 12. Screw the "traditional powers" that keep milking the system whether they win, lose, or draw.

There's not a shred of dignity or integrity within the athletic department at UT. I guarantee you they'd take a bowl bid at 5-7...with Mack Brown mumbling his putrid crap all the way to the bank. They shamelessly whine and manipulate even when they are winning. A little losing won't humble those money-grubbing maggots.

And if UNT had a chance to go to a bowl games with the same record....they wouldn't go.....yea right!

MeanMag Rising Star

MeanMag

Posted
Posted

O.K., I'll say it. I would be shocked if Mack Brown accepted a bowl invitation with a 5-7 record.

I doubt it's Mack Brown's decision. It's probably the ADs. Both of their contracts probably give them bonuses for bowl appearances.

oldguystudent Newbie

oldguystudent

Posted
Posted (edited)

And nobody is positing that 70 bowl slots is perhaps a tad too many? I recall two years ago that there were 68 slots and exactly 68 eligible teams. Might as well just have 60 bowl games so everybody gets to play.

Edited by oldguystudent
  • Upvote 1
Rudy Grand Master

Rudy

Posted
Posted

And nobody is positing that 70 bowl slots is perhaps a tad too many? I recall two years ago that there were 68 slots and exactly 68 eligible teams. Might as well just have 60 bowl games so everybody gets to play.

Give it a few years. Bowl games for everyone will be the NCAA's version or participation trophies for all.

BaylorGuy314 Newbie

BaylorGuy314

Posted
Posted

I think you would solve the problem quickly to simply say you need to be at least 7-5. A quick glance at the standings reveals 16 or so teams that are bowl eligible with only 6 wins. If 50% of those lose their remaining game, that's at least 8 teams that will go to a bowl game with a 6 win record. Also, there are about a half dozen teams that currently have 5 wins that will likely get their 6th this weekend to make them eligible.

In other words, about 12-16 teams will go to bowls this year with 6 wins. That's 6-8 bowl games that, frankly, need to be cut.

MeanMag Rising Star

MeanMag

Posted
Posted

This whole bowl system is a mind numbing sham. Teams/schools don't make money for going to bowl games. Bowl games make money for themselves. That's why there's so many. If anything, they will keep adding bowls and teams to D-1A so that more bowls can be added because more teams will be bowl eligible.

Until schools start turning down bowl bids, they will keep adding more.

  • Upvote 1
GoMeanGreen1999 Rising Star

GoMeanGreen1999

Posted
Posted

This whole bowl system is a mind numbing sham. Teams/schools don't make money for going to bowl games. Bowl games make money for themselves. That's why there's so many. If anything, they will keep adding bowls and teams to D-1A so that more bowls can be added because more teams will be bowl eligible.

Until schools start turning down bowl bids, they will keep adding more.

+1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 16

      Why Support this Program?….Seriously!?

      Yep, and thanks. So, are MSU and UTSA the only 2 ranked opponents we’ve ever beaten? I can’t find a good resource for that info but did hear it announced during the Army game. If so, that’s even more pathetic than I first thought: one win was via forfeit and the other was against a startup program.
      gangrene in Mean Green Football
    2. 16

      Why Support this Program?….Seriously!?

      Agreed. Similar case can be made for Simon, as he coached in the first few years of our return to D1 when half our games were body bag games. And the guys preceding him were playing D-2 schedules. But, the point is we are historically a really bad program no matter who is coaching, which conference, classification or stadium we’re playing in. Any time a UNT coach has success, we worry he will use as a stepping stone to a better program. We should be so lucky. Hugh Freeze, Mario Cristobal, Lane Kiffin are three former conference opponent coaches that immediately come to mind, now coaching P5 schools.
      gangrene in Mean Green Football
    3. 3

      An Old Fan's Advice To You Young Fans

      As someone who both hires and fires people, and who has had to tell people “sorry, but you just don’t meet our standard”, I cut Jared Mosley a little slack…until the season has ended. There can be times you know a change needs to be made but, for a myriad of reasons, you choose no comment over good or bad comments and you discreetly do what needs to be done. It isn’t flashy and doesn’t garner the headlines of a hardline “we DEMAND better!” statement, but the job gets done nonetheless. I agree that E. Morris is in well above his head, and beating ECU and a floundering Temple team won’t change that, but I can stomach a change being made at season’s end.
      emmitt01 in Mean Green Football
    4. 12

      Why is the big white kid not playing?

      Stone game has not gotten better and when he is on the floor, its 4 vs 5
      • 1
      • Upvote
      Big Z in Mean Green Basketball
    5. 404

      ***OFFICIAL UNT vs. UTSA IN-GAME DISCUSSION***

      The lost last year to FIU was enough for me to know this coach wasn't going to elevate the program.... We will be the weakness bowl team to get in....and I mean if we get in
      Big Z in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,478
    • Most Online
      1,865
    meangreen0015
    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.