Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It seems like the offense was pressing. Outside of Jeremy Phillips, the defense didn't seem to do much of anything. I saw someone over in the chat badmouthing Riley. I think he did as well as anyone could have today. It was like the offense needed to score a touchdown every drive.

Edited by eulessismore
Posted (edited)

Basing the HC job on a close win or close loss isn't smart. I don't think the actual win/lose of this game will matter.

Unless he was coaching defense, I don't see it as a big deal for Canales, except for one thing: wins and losses are the record that matters for head coaches, interim or not.

Still, if George O'Leary could go 0-3 as interim at Georgia Tech, then go on to turn things around there, and take UCF to a very good record, I think he should still be in the running. I can only think of good things to say about O'leary for what he did on the field, by the way.

Edited by eulessismore
Posted

.

Our offense was horrible in the 2nd half. ULM did a good job game planning us.

We ended the game with 37 points on the board.

Dunbar had 3 yards in the 2nd half?

Dunbar was injured in the 1st qtr of the game and played the rest of the game at about 60%. The injury bug bit us again.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted

If you look logically, expecting Canales to win with this team is too much to ask. However, the loss probably put him out of contention. I do think Canales has done great under the circumstances, and will have little problem getting a job whether at oc or hc at a lower division or tier fb school.

Posted

Dunbar was injured in the 1st qtr of the game and played the rest of the game at about 60%. The injury bug bit us again.

The 83 yard touchdown run was AFTER the injury. Seems that Dunbar was in pretty good shape at that point.

I have to agree wit the title of this thread. While I have really liked what Canales has done with this team, he was already a long shot and needed every win possible to help him. Whether or not it really should matter, today's loss hurt his chances.

  • Upvote 3
Posted

I was here at the game and ULM's offensive line was bigger and much faster than our defensive front. Their guards were very quick and got to the corner to open up holes for their feature back. Yes, I know that is part of the game and all. Just pointing it out. We need some size on our defensive front, which has been pointed out many times here. RV's decision just got tougher, and this will define his career here more than anything except for the stadium.

Posted

I was here at the game and ULM's offensive line was bigger and much faster than our defensive front. Their guards were very quick and got to the corner to open up holes for their feature back. Yes, I know that is part of the game and all. Just pointing it out. We need some size on our defensive front, which has been pointed out many times here. RV's decision just got tougher, and this will define his career here more than anything except for the stadium.

That's the sad truth of this game and the outcome. Monroe has as good or better talent and much of it comes out of our own backyard in DFW. This has to change.

Posted

Soooo, Wednesday we start a thread that Canales should not be based on this season's record against SBC schools, now we start one saying it should? Hey the Belt has gotten stronger. It will be hard for us to win EVERY conference game for a while. Chico's evaluation should be based on many things, not just this outcome.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Posted

Soooo, Wednesday we start a thread that Canales should not be based on this season's record against SBC schools, now we start one saying it should? Hey the Belt has gotten stronger. It will be hard for us to win EVERY conference game for a while. Chico's evaluation should be based on many things, not just this outcome.

This!

Posted

It's sad anyone considered the past 4 games as a tryout. It was in no way fair to Canales for that to be the case. His coaching career should be his selling point. Not interim status at NT. I just hope people stop blindly following him because he won a couple of games. There could be some really great candidates out there but people would emotionally jump on the Canales bandwagon. All coaches lose. Hopefully this will be over soon and we can focus on the future. I still think we need clean slate.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Posted

Soooo, Wednesday we start a thread that Canales should not be based on this season's record against SBC schools, now we start one saying it should? Hey the Belt has gotten stronger. It will be hard for us to win EVERY conference game for a while. Chico's evaluation should be based on many things, not just this outcome.

The Sun Belt is not harder this year than it has been in the past. I believe there is ONE team with a winning record coming into today's games and that team got absolutely hammered today.

I do not believe that our next head coach is currently on staff nor do I believe that the University paid 40k for a firm to name a current coach. But who knows.

  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 2
Posted

I wasn't impressed by Riley all that much today. Several times I saw our players beat the coverage and Riley didn't give it to them... even when Riley had time. I believe it was because he simply can't get it to them that far. Riley knows his limitations.

I look forward to seeing who gets the starting role next season. Riley will have a good shot. But, I think it will go to someone else.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

That's the sad truth of this game and the outcome. Monroe has as good or better talent and much of it comes out of our own backyard in DFW. This has to change.

While listening to the game, I heard George call out a Texas town almost every time he referenced a La-Mo player's home town. Sort of left me wondering if they have any players on their roster that aren't from Texas.

Posted

Chances are gone thx to Dodge's and Deloach's lack defensive recruiting and failures inthe 4Q

Not sure that we can blame the defensive recruiting. We had the second rated run defense in the conference prior to today and see what ULM did to them. DeLoache can cast blame for our recruiting but our defensive players were higher rated recruits than ULM. Could it possibly be the coaching?

Posted

So you think the coaching staff did a good job with adjustments then?

So what happened to Byrd - he only had 4 carries...he has done well running the ball so if Dunbar was limited, which they said on the radio broadcast he was, I couldn't figure out why we weren't giving Byrd the ball more.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 24

      Mensah Getting $8 Million NIL Deal

    2. 24

      Mensah Getting $8 Million NIL Deal

    3. 1

      Where are they now? Jason Edwards

    4. 94

      Portal players leaving

    5. 47

      Chris Jimmerson

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,505
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined
  • Most Points

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      137,408
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      131,325
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      123,950
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      109,004
  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,591,267
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,480,984
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      841,171
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
    7. 7
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      454,039
    8. 8
    9. 9
    10. 10
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.