Jump to content

Will The Economy Dictate A Shift

the real grad88

By the real grad88
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

the real grad88 Newbie

the real grad88

Posted
Posted

I saw the post below about UC-Berkley cancelling several programs because of funds, and it got me to thinking about the cost of all of the far-flungness of so many conferences and the "new economy." I have wondered for a while how long it will be before some state governments begin to put 2 and 2 together and realize how much money is being wasted on unnecessary travel and then begin to nudge schools to make realignments based upon regional proximty (common sense). It makes no sense that Houston is playing schools way out East when they have schools a short bus ride away. Why is North Texas playing MTSU and Troy when they have much closer regional options? Someone at some point is going to start asking those questions! Not just costs...but how about the stimulation of local/state economies? How much money would be generated in TEXAS by an all-Texas (or mostly Texas/regional) conference!? A lot.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
the real grad88 Newbie

the real grad88

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Another thought: How many schools could actually bring their budgets into the black by cutting down on their travel costs AND building rivalries with schools so that fans could actually travel to away games, thereby increasing attendance. A conference with NT, SMU, Houston, Rice, UT-EP, Texas State(?), UT-SA(?), Tulsa, La-Tech, and maybe Tulane, I think all ships would rise from increasing attendance. What about the regional TV revenues that could come from such a conference? If it could just be tried, it would work.

Edited by the real grad88
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
NT80 Grand Master

NT80

Posted
Posted

Most conferences determine membership by football power, and all other sports follow.

It would make more sense for the far-flung football conferences to be for football only, and all other sports be in regional conferences.

Of course then you have to define "regional". Regional for Texas could be 600+ miles, but in the Northeast it could be 200 miles or less.

Green Mean Enthusiast

Green Mean

Posted
Posted

For the big conferences, I don't forsee the shift to make it more region friendly unless you're a small program. It all goes back to TV money.....that won't be decreasing anytime soon. Look at the Rangers...they got a historic TV deal even when the economy is very down. And folks the economy won't be slow forever...in a few years things will start to boom again and it will all be good.

GrayEagle Veteran

GrayEagle

Posted
Posted

TV still drives the bus. BCS AQ conferences have it; non-AQ don't.

The wisest solution would be to divide the non-AQ teams into four 12-team conferences based on proximity. It would save on travel expenses and build regional rivalries...thus increasing attendance. The TV revenue would be shared based on attendance or some similar formula.

The NCAA is a hollow association with little authority to do what is best for the membership as a whole so there is no chance of using any measure of common sense or reasoning. It won't happen.

PlummMeanGreen Grand Master

PlummMeanGreen

Posted
Posted

Another thought: How many schools could actually bring their budgets into the black by cutting down on their travel costs AND building rivalries with schools so that fans could actually travel to away games, thereby increasing attendance. A conference with NT, SMU, Houston, Rice, UT-EP, Texas State(?), UT-SA(?), Tulsa, La-Tech, and maybe Tulane, I think all ships would rise from increasing attendance. What about the regional TV revenues that could come from such a conference? If it could just be tried, it would work.

Our program will all but have to be a clone of the Boise St. football program before many of the aforementioned schools accept us into "The Club." It still all boils down to politics--guess it always will. Moreso for UNT with the private schools than public.

It took a 20/20 tie with UT back in 196? for UH to lose their "cooty-status" state-wide and that is when Darrell Royal said "we need UH in the SWC." MORE TO IT: DKR wanted UH in the SWC so they would also have to recruit under SWC rules, too.

GMG!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 30

      24/25 MBB Attendance Tracker

      Third home game in a row under 3K in attendance and 4th for the season. Now at 2,947, average attendance is down almost 13% (439 per game) compared to the first 7 home games last year. We are now down 1,185 in average attendance compared to last season's full year average. The home conference slate kicks off with UAB on New Year's Eve. Hopefully, we will be able to chip away at this attendance deficit as some familiar foes visit the Super Pit, but it looks like hitting a 4K average and growing average attendance for the 3rd year in a row is becoming increasingly out of reach. Just win and they will come they said. SMH. On the bright side, we're currently sitting at 9-3 and 7-0 at home and own the 2nd best Net rating in the conference only behind Memphis. Unfortunately, the conference is incredibly weak this year so we don't have many opportunities to improve that ranking. Aside from winning on the road at Memphis, holding serve in terms of a Net rating may be the best we can do from here. Actually, looking at the schedule, we do have three Q2 road games (Wichita St, FAU and Temple). They need to keep winning and we will need to win those three to improve our resume.
      keith in Mean Green Basketball
    2. 61

      SMUt getting owned by State

      Tell me you’ll peddle BS on SMU’s behalf without telling me you’ll peddle BS on SMU’s behalf. Here is SMU’s attendance claim for this season; one so amazing that they made a nifty graphic for it. The only issue? Well, they played 7 home games and the stadium seats 32k…so an average attendance of 32,651 which is standing room only and beyond capacity is a bit difficult to swallow and leads one to believe that only believers in SMU math would buy it. And save me the “but look at North Texas’ attendance” garbage. Even someone as committed to being separated from reality as you knows that if North Texas 1) bought their way into the ACC to allow us to fill our stadium with opposing fans, 2) overpaid for players, and 3) had the easiest conference schedule possible to stack wins…Apogee would have been LEGITIMATELY sold out. And let me save you the trouble of the next silly argument you were just itching to type as a retort…yes, we have far more alumni, but we are not situated DEAD CENTER in a city of 1.3 Million people like SMU has been for decades
      • 2
      • Upvote
      emmitt01 in Mean Green Football
    3. 22

      Stop Blaming Athletes and the NCAA for Ruining College Football

      Come to think of it, ESPN and the other networks who really benefit from all of this, should contribute $$ to a NIL fund and distribute equally to each schools NIL for them to use at their discretion. Wouldn't that be fair?
      • 1
      • Thanks
      Hunter Green in Mean Green Football
    4. 61

      SMUt getting owned by State

      Say you didn't see any SMU crowds this season, without saying you didn't see any SMU home crowds this season. That place was packed and rocking, like nobody could've dreamed.
      • 1
      • Upvote
      dodgefan in Mean Green Football
    5. 15

      Auburn warns of potential ticket price hike ahead of revenue-sharing model

      I mean are you saying you want to know exactly what every player is paid? My worry is you would have each of them know that number is so they can be jealous and fight about it. I think the coaches have to determine the amounts and allocations unless you are an SMU or someone who can afford to pay every player on the roster 100k a piece. If you don’t have mountains of cash you have to allocate per the coaches wish I would think. Agents come into play sadly as well I suppose.
      • 1
      • Upvote
      Jonnyeagle in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,505
    • Most Online
      1,865
    Jepper
    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined

  • Most Points

    1. 1
      El Paso Eagle
      El Paso Eagle
      170,044
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      136,958
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      130,960
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      123,785
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      108,904

  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,591,107
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,480,984
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      841,161
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
      SteaminWillieBeamin
    7. 7
      cousin oliver
      cousin oliver
      448,120
    8. 8
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      389,039
    9. 9
      meangreenfaninno
    10. 10
      South Texas Green

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.