Lance Armstrong

[UNTLifer]

If yes, how did he get around the testing?

[Rudy]

I don't think so. Sometimes there really are cases of the triumph of the human spirit. I think this is one of them.

[TheColonyEagle]

My cynicism is off the charts with pro athletes today. Just when you think "Surely HE didn't do that," you end up disappointed.

If Michael Young got caught robbing an old lady at gunpoint while sleeping with a prostitute during a cocaine binge, I would be very hurt and disappointed but wouldn't be surprised.

Nothing surprises me anymore. It's sad but yes, a few (actually more than a few) bad ones have cast a shadow over all of them.

Do I think Armstrong doped? Surely he didn't, but I won't be surprised when they find out he did.

So my vote is Yes.

[KRAM1]

Do we really care? Like most, nothing in professional sports surprises me these days. I certainly hope Lance was "clean" and he certainly has spent a good bit of time and money fighting allegations that he used PHD's, but I say "no". I think the guy is "clean", but again, it is professional sport. So, .........................

[Green Mean]

I really hope he didn't use PED's because he really has a great story. And plus there is just something so douchey about Floyd Landis. Everytime I see his face I feel like biatch slapping him and kicking his ass.

[UNTLifer]

What's LeMond's beef with Armstrong other than just seeming bitter that Armstrong passed him as America's Greatest Cyclist?

I agree with Landis. How can you ever believe this guy? He's doing anything to make a buck since his career and credibility are gone.

[Green P1]

As bad as he sucked balls under the increased scrutiny of his last attempts, I'd say yes.

The guy's a douche. Anyone spending that much time with Matthew McConehey has d-bag written all over him.

Edited July 27, 2010 by Green P1

[UNT90]

There are 2 types of champion professional cyclist. Those that have tested positive for PEDs and those that have yet to be caught.

By far the dirtiest sport in existence.

Edited July 28, 2010 by UNT90

[Mean Green 93-98]

There are 2 types of champion professional cyclist. Those that have tested positive for PHDs and those that have yet to be caught.

By far the dirtiest sport in existence.

Is testing positive for PHDs necessarily a bad thing? If so, I'd say the North Texas English department is far dirtier than any cycling team.

[Army of Dad]

As bad as he sucked balls under the increased scrutiny of his last attempts, I'd say yes.

The guy's a douche. Anyone spending that time with Matthew McConehey has d-bag written all over him.

You mean that athlete struggling to regain his former dominance as he ages means his previous accomplishments are tainted? Seems like some odd logic, though I will agree with you that spending time with McConehey puts you on the fast track to douche status.

[forevereagle]

As bad as he sucked balls under the increased scrutiny of his last attempts, I'd say yes.

The guy's a douche. Anyone spending that time with Matthew McConehey has d-bag written all over him.

Ironic or unfortunate?

[UNT90]

Is testing positive for PHDs necessarily a bad thing? If so, I'd say the North Texas English department is far dirtier than any cycling team.

I knew there was a reason that I got Cs. I was clean!!!

Fixed it.