Jump to content

Documents Show Inner Dealings To Keep Big 12 Alive


gangrene

Recommended Posts

beebe.pdf

Documents show inner dealings to keep Big 12 alive

This story, and Beebe's "confidential white paper" in particular, is an interesting read. In my opinion, Beebe's plea was desperate, full of speculation and relied heavily on conjecture intended to frighten and/or panic the Big 12 ADs into believing the formation of 16-team super conferences would result in congressional intervention, pressure to pay student-athletes, tax consequences, public scrutiny and increased pressure on ADs and HCs to compete and win. He even cited the Big 10's loss of population, Pac 10's "fair-weather" fans and travel costs/time zone differences and the southern/Sun Belt region fans' geographical pride as reasons to ponder when exploring conference options.

Seriously? Is that what kept the Big 12(-2) together? Aside from being well-written, this reads like any message board thread on conference realignment...heavy on opinion and light on facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot to add that if the remaining Big XII schools had concerns over time zone differences for student athletes (a highly publicized concern for Texas A&M) and travel costs to the west coast schools (and Beebe must have felt they were valid concerns to include them in his plea), shouldn't UNT be even more concerned about those issues in regards to the WAC for the same reasons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot to add that if the remaining Big XII schools had concerns over time zone differences for student athletes (a highly publicized concern for Texas A&M) and travel costs to the west coast schools (and Beebe must have felt they were valid concerns to include them in his plea), shouldn't UNT be even more concerned about those issues in regards to the WAC for the same reasons?

Then shouldn't A&M have pushed to stay in the Big 12 (all Central Time Zone with the departure of Colorado) instead of toying with the SEC (two time zones)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then shouldn't A&M have pushed to stay in the Big 12 (all Central Time Zone with the departure of Colorado) instead of toying with the SEC (two time zones)?

Good question...apparently A&M AD, Bill Byrne, didn't see the same issues with the one-hour time zone difference of the SEC as he did with the two-hour difference with the Pac 10 schools. Plus, Gene Stallings was really pushing the Aggies to join the SEC because of his past relationship there.

Pac-10 and Big 12: Will It Be a Partnership Or a Raid?

The report says that the six rumored Big 12 schools would fuse with Arizona and Arizona State to form an eight-team division. USC, UCLA, Oregon, Oregon State, Cal, Stanford, Washington and Washington State would form the other division of the "Big 16."

But Texas A&M athletic director Bill Byrne seemed to shoot down any such alliance on Wednesday before the report came out, saying the two-hour time difference and the distance between the schools would create logistical nightmares, especially for the non-revenue sports.

"I've heard a lot about the distances we'd have to have our student-athletes travel," Byrne said. "We had a really tough experience in April when we had to bring our teams from Seattle and Spokane and after ballgames and we got into College Station at I believe 6:30 in the morning. Then we expect for our kids to go to class at 8 o'clock. That's tough. We are really concerned about student-athletes on this thing."

Texas A&M reportedly still considering SEC

It's hard to imagine Texas and Texas A&M joining separate conferences -- their football rivalry goes back more than a century -- but Texas appears to have no interest in the SEC, while Texas A&M seems to be divided about the Pac-10, according to the report.

Texas A&M athletic director Bill Byrne, a former Oregon AD, is opposed to extensive westward travel for the Aggies, according to the report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe all those concerns are valid. DOJ is already looking at the BCS, no reason in these economic times why Congress wouldn't look at whether athletic departments spending $80 million + with 15% or less of that money spent on the kids should be eligible to receive money as "charitable" donations.

If donations to the Texas athletic department became taxable and the donations fell by an amount equal to the tax paid, the Horns would lose in excess of $10 million a year. They spend 6.18% of their revenue on scholarships and that's supposedly their charitable focus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.