Jump to content

Wac Expansion Candidates Are Ranked/rated


MeanGreen61

Recommended Posts

UNT is the only FBS candidate listed.

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=451&f=2368&t=6076127

Well it was just done by someone posting on the Wacy board. It is not a ranking by some credible source.

The Presidents, the people who make the real decisions, have stated through Benson they don't want to add a team that doesn't want to stay long term. Montana is not interested so they are now "out of the footprint." We would strongly prefer CUSA so we are just "technically" an option. They don't want us and our administration people don't want them.

The Sun Belt is NOT going to add Texas State yet and they certainly won't consider UTSA since they don't even have a team yet. The Sun Belt doesn't need them and they don't add enough to make cutting the pie smaller. For those two schools, especially UTSA, their only hope of FBS ball is by going Wacy so they are desperate to join. They are so desperate they ignore all of the downsides to the point of pretending Logan, Utah is somehow close to them.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it was just done by someone posting on the Wacy board. It is not a ranking by some credible source.

The Presidents, the people who make the real decisions, have stated through Benson they don't want to add a team that doesn't want to stay long term. Montana is not interested so they are now "out of the footprint." We would strongly prefer CUSA so we are just "technically" an option. They don't want us and our administration people don't want them.

The Sun Belt is NOT going to add Texas State yet and they certainly won't consider UTSA since they don't even have a team yet. The Sun Belt doesn't need them and they don't add enough to make cutting the pie smaller. For those two schools, especially UTSA, their only hope of FBS ball is by going Wacy so they are desperate to join. They are so desperate they ignore all of the downsides to the point of pretending Logan, Utah is somehow close to them.

Is there a reason that you continually refer to the WAC as the Wacy ? Many Folks don't like slangy references to the Sun Belt as being demeaning, but we have folks who do the same with conferences.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a reason that you continually refer to the WAC as the Wacy ? Many Folks don't like slangy references to the Sun Belt as being demeaning, but we have folks who do the same with conferences.

I have to admit, Sun Belch does kinda make me giggle.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.