You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
Our students do pretty much have their own entrance, restrooms, and concessions. Plus the hill is mostly students, so there’s a “landing” welcoming students to the game. Our students have it pretty easy compared to a lot of the country. Our issue has been finding reasons for them to come to games.
Similarly, the PAC-12 may be aiming for a world that doesn’t really exist: of high-paying networks with a cash-rich streaming deal supplementing income. The networks have made clear their dance cards are largely filled, and as Crakes points out, there is no guarantee the tech companies are riding over the horizon to save the day.
Can Pac-12 find new media deal win? (msn.com)
Listening now -- I think the point about the Cal/TTU thing is a good one. For me, I thought the Cal game was worse. This TTU game was a weird timing as the offense is very young. The squad was supposed to be more stacked last year. BUT The offense fell flat in both games vs P4/5 teams and that's very non-good.
I don't mind losing (per se) but I do not want "An absolute joke" type games every time we play them
It's beginning to feel that way.
The thought of UTSA passing us by to the PAC and making double the TV revenue dollars than us makes me sick. Not to mention the recruiting advantage UTSA would have moving forward.
Then watching Air Force join the AAC as full-share member while we chill here making half-share. 🤮
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.