Non- B C S Top 10

[MeanGreen61]

No Belt teams. Idaho & Ohio make the list.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/12388816

Edited October 20, 2009 by MeanGreen61

[untbowler]

Not a bad list, no Belt team deserves mention, this also shows how close we are with some polish and coaching.

[UNTflyer]

I hate the term "non-BCS". I prefer "non-AQ conferences".

[Censored by Laurie]

Tulsa would go all Kobe Bryant in Colorado on Temple and any MAC school.

[untbowler]

Tulsa would go all Kobe Bryant in Colorado on Temple and any MAC school.

agreed, seems odd they fell out when they lost to the #4 Team in the nation by 1 TD.

[MDH]

Ya, because Fresno State wouldn't plow over #5-10 on that list. They're clearly ones for good records, and maybe they should be. But Fresno losing in close games to 2 top 5 teams and a 2OT loss @ Camp Randall isn't really the same as another squad's 3-3. All I'm saying is the Vandals won't have an answer for Ryan Mathews when we come to the Kibbie. They could barely manage Hawaii on their home turf...Hawaii.

[Quoner]

Ya, because Fresno State wouldn't plow over #5-10 on that list. They're clearly ones for good records, and maybe they should be. But Fresno losing in close games to 2 top 5 teams and a 2OT loss @ Camp Randall isn't really the same as another squad's 3-3. All I'm saying is the Vandals won't have an answer for Ryan Mathews when we come to the Kibbie. They could barely manage Hawaii on their home turf...Hawaii.

Dude, I like you, but save it for the Fresno board.

PS: This is me trying to play "not-UNT football board bully" when I don't care at all. Hell, let's talk swimming and diving -- the Horns are looking strong again this year.

Edited October 20, 2009 by Quoner

[forevereagle]

I hate the term "non-BCS". I prefer "non-AQ conferences".

Why? I feel that non-BCS is much more accurate. Schools that are in this group have to be undefeated (and sometimes that is still not good enough) and still don't actually get a shot at the C. Never have, and likely never will.

[VideoEagle]

Why? I feel that non-BCS is much more accurate. Schools that are in this group have to be undefeated (and sometimes that is still not good enough) and still don't actually get a shot at the C. Never have, and likely never will.

Technically, all schools in the Bowl Subdivision are in the Bowl Championship Series. Champions of certain conferences get automatic entry, but according to the rules, all 1A teams are a part of the BCS system. All of the conferences get at least a share of the money.

[forevereagle]

Technically, all schools in the Bowl Subdivision are in the Bowl Championship Series. Champions of certain conferences get automatic entry, but according to the rules, all 1A teams are a part of the BCS system. All of the conferences get at least a share of the money.

Technically, yes that is true. In practice, Utah last year should have had a shot at the NC since they didn't lose a game and beat a pretty good Bama team. Tell me that they are a full member of the BCS and have all the same opportunities.