Bho

eulesseagle · October 9, 2009

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33237202/ns/politics-white_house

seriously.......like what has he done?

Censored by Laurie · October 9, 2009

Oh boy...this is gonna be a fun read today.

Congratulations Barack Hussein Obama! Way to make America proud and show that not every Muslim fashions a vest made of C-4!

untbowler · October 9, 2009

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33237202/ns/politics-white_house
seriously.......like what has he done?

So we can assume that the feeling has run even further upto Chris Matthews groin, somebody better give him a pin.

KingDL1 · October 9, 2009

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33237202/ns/politics-white_house
seriously.......like what has he done?

Nothing, just set up to help his poll numbers

TheTastyGreek · October 9, 2009

It's a kiss-and-make-up from the rest of the world because of the whole Chicago Olympics deal.

Later today, they'll announce Oprah won the prize in Physics. And Chicago gets to host the Eurovision competition next year.

KRAM1 · October 9, 2009

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!!!! Man, you have to give credit to the guy's PR firm...they are doing a great job of "kissing up" as BHO does a great job of kissing the backside of every rogue leader and regime he can find.

Nobel Peace Prize? Please, please do tell me what he has done?????? They must be singing in the streets in North Korea, Venezuela, Honduras, China, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, Iran, etc., etc., etc.

Amazing...but, then again, it is "Change", so it has to be great, right?

Man, I'm glad it's Friday so I can focus on college football over the weekend. Maybe that will distract all the media "darlings" from gushing over Mr. O's latest grand achievement...while, of course, he goes about "saving" so many US jobs, reforming health care, deciding whether or not to pull the rug out from under the military efforts in Afghanistan, socializing more US industries, paying off his Union backers with more restrictive tariffs, sitting idle while the dollar sinks ever lower and lower due to his ever increasing federal debt and deficit, etc., etc. I'm just giddy all over with all this "change" taking place.

Congrats on that Peace Prize thing.........

Let me just add....GO MEAN GREEN!

PS...it's Friday morning...thought it was time to wake up folks here on GMG.com a bit... :lol:

TheTastyGreek · October 9, 2009

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!!!! Man, you have to give credit to the guy's PR firm...they are doing a great job of "kissing up" as BHO does a great job of kissing the backside of every rogue leader and regime he can find.
Nobel Peace Prize? Please, please do tell me what he has done?????? They must be singing in the streets in North Korea, Venezuela, Honduras, China, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, Iran, etc., etc., etc.
Amazing...but, then again, it is "Change", so it has to be great, right?
Man, I'm glad it's Friday so I can focus on college football over the weekend. Maybe that will distract all the media "darlings" from gushing over Mr. O's latest grand achievement...while, of course, he goes about "saving" so many US jobs, reforming health care, deciding whether or not to pull the rug out from under the military efforts in Afghanistan, socializing more US industries, paying off his Union backers with more restrictive tariffs, sitting idle while the dollar sinks ever lower and lower due to his ever increasing federal debt and deficit, etc., etc. I'm just giddy all over with all this "change" taking place.
Congrats on that Peace Prize thing.........
Let me just add....GO MEAN GREEN!
PS...it's Friday morning...thought it was time to wake up folks here on GMG.com a bit...

If it makes you feel any better, it's distinctly possible that he'll give the award to Jack Lemmon.

The work Lemmon did in Grumpy Old Men (and continued in Grumpier Old Men) showed the world through parable and art the futility of long running conflict, and was (in the opinion of many political analysts) the driving force behind the 1993 Peace Accords.

It'll all work out in the end.

JayDub · October 9, 2009

All we're missing is FireHelmetJesus and we'll have a completed "Glenn Beck Idiot Patrol" trifecta.

If you truly believe the world was a more peaceful place under te reign of Darth Cheney, well, then you're apparently less educated than I thought. If nothing else, I can honestly say, I feel safer when traveling internationally now than I did before.

Green P1 · October 9, 2009

Just when you think you can't hate that jerk any more he goes and wins the freaking Nobel Peace Prize.

:blowup:

TheTastyGreek · October 9, 2009

All we're missing is FireHelmetJesus and we'll have a completed "Glenn Beck Idiot Patrol" trifecta.
If you truly believe the world was a more peaceful place under te reign of Darth Cheney, well, then you're apparently less educated than I thought. If nothing else, I can honestly say, I feel safer when traveling internationally now than I did before.

Looking through some laureate history, this looks like Eisaku Sato, take two.

I'm excited for Obama. If Lech Walesa has taught us anything, it's that a Nobel Peace Prize can be a fantastic springboard into a lucrative career hosting a fishing show on Polish TV.

TheTastyGreek · October 9, 2009

Just when you think you can't hate that jerk any more he goes and wins the freaking Nobel Peace Prize.

The whole thing reeks of Affirmative Action.

It's obviously liberal guilt for giving the 1919 prize to Woodrow Wilson, a noted (and virulent) racist.

I just think it's repulsive that Obama gets the award, when so many more qualified white Americans are still unemployed, and could desperately use the accompanying cash prize to buy health care that will murder the elderly relatives of poor people.

CMJ · October 9, 2009

Definitely premature(besides it's kind of amusing that a President actively involved in perhaps escalating a war gets a peace prize), but it's just more evidence (as if more were needed) of how much Bush alienated the entire world. There were over 200 nominations this year, and I'm not sure the amount of voters, or voting procedures, but it's likely to me that he won as some sort of compormise choice. The award itself doesn't really mean much, no matter who wins it, beyond symbolism. Obviously the panel thought it symbolized a "screw you" to the Bush regime since Obama has been trying to mend fences.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Mean Green 93-98 · October 9, 2009

It's obviously liberal guilt for giving the 1919 prize to Woodrow Wilson, a noted (and virulent) racist. . . .

. . . and liberal.

TheTastyGreek · October 9, 2009

Definitely premature(besides it's kind of amusing that a President actively involved in perhaps escalating a war gets a peace prize), but it's just more evidence (as if more were needed) of how much Bush alienated the entire world. There were over 200 nominations this year, and I'm not sure the amount of voters, or voting procedures, but it's likely to me that he won as some sort of compormise choice. The award itself doesn't really mean much, no matter who wins it, beyond symbolism. Obviously the panel thought it symbolized a "screw you" to the Bush regime since Obama has been trying to mend fences.
Nothing more, nothing less.

The Nobel Prize was created as a means of alleviating disgrace and international shame/remorse for previous acts.

According to the logic you mention, this is perhaps the most appropriate and relevant choice in the history of the award.

TheTastyGreek · October 9, 2009

. . . and liberal.

Which just goes to show how meaningless that label is, considering it used to be applied to a segregationist who created the military draft, enacted the first federal drug prohibitions, and committed some pretty serious crimes against the first amendment.

hickoryhouse · October 9, 2009

Definitely premature(besides it's kind of amusing that a President actively involved in perhaps escalating a war gets a peace prize), but it's just more evidence (as if more were needed) of how much Bush alienated the entire world. There were over 200 nominations this year, and I'm not sure the amount of voters, or voting procedures, but it's likely to me that he won as some sort of compormise choice. The award itself doesn't really mean much, no matter who wins it, beyond symbolism. Obviously the panel thought it symbolized a "screw you" to the Bush regime since Obama has been trying to mend fences.
Nothing more, nothing less.

Obama has a chance of doing some good things such as reducing the number of nuclear weapons and he as already made good progress on that front. But this is incredibly premature and I think that CMJ makes a good point, this is a slap to the Bush administration which was not looked upon favorably in many place across the world. I found two things that were really interesting to me in the article,

The award appeared to be a slap at Bush from a committee that harshly criticized Obama's predecessor for his largely unilateral military action in the wake of the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

and

Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, who won the prize in 1984, said Obama's award shows great things are expected from him in coming years.

I didn't think that you got this award for having promise, that would be like awarding the New England Patriots the Lombardy Trophy in 2007 just because they were the consensus pick for Super Bowl Champs that year.

Also I don't feel any safer when I travel abroad now than I did two years ago or four or 10. That's not really an issue that I have experienced, personally I think that s a random talking point that doesn't really hold water unless you are traveling to someplace you shouldn't be in the first place, and those places are still dangerous now even though Obama is in charge. Disapproving talk about our government or country from people as I travel to their country is not particularly threatening nor dangerous 99% of the time. I might take issue with them on their opinions and in truth they are pretty informed about what happens over here but they do not have the basis of knowledge that comes form living here and seeing it first hand. I enjoy having these conversations over a beer in a pub, or a campfire on the side of a mountain because I learn things about their countries and other social structures that I never would have known or in many cases even thought about. It is fascinating, educational and helps me to develop a better world view than I would have otherwise.

I was in Nairobi Kenya in the first part of January 2008 when they were going through the election crisis and marshal law had broken out, that was dangerous and I did not feel safe there, but that had nothing to do with our sitting President at the time or anything else over here. We are not that important.

Mean Green 93-98 · October 9, 2009

Which just goes to show how meaningless that label is, considering it used to be applied to a segregationist who created the military draft, enacted the first federal drug prohibitions, and committed some pretty serious crimes against the first amendment.

None of those acts or philosophies suggests conservatism. There are varying definitions of "liberal" and "conservative"; but when referring to these terms politically, it can pretty much be boiled down to one's view of law and use of government. Conservatives basically believe in a strict interpretation of law based upon its original intent, while liberals believe in a looser interpretation to suit what they perceive as changing times and changing needs. Conservatives generally believe in a much narrower role for government than do liberals.

KingDL1 · October 9, 2009

The biggest Joke of all is the nomination deadline of Feb.1 talk about a rigged award.

UNT90 · October 9, 2009

The biggest Joke of all is the nomination deadline of Feb.1 talk about a rigged award.

Yep, 10 days into his term, he was already peace prize worthy.

His parallel path with Jimmy Carter continues...

GreenBat · October 9, 2009

Yep, 10 days into his term, he was already peace prize worthy.
His parallel path with Jimmy Carter continues...

Just goes to show that the rest of the world saw his greatness, now if the right side of the aisle in his own country saw the same thing.

Could you please explain in an unbiased, bi-partisian OUR PRESIDENT's parrallel path to former president Carter.

Censored by Laurie · October 9, 2009

We are not that important.

I'll be taking that...thank you.

Mean Green 93-98 · October 9, 2009

Just goes to show that the rest of the world saw his greatness, now if the right side of the aisle in his own country saw the same thing.

You are aware that "the rest of the world" does not vote for the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, right? It's a few liberal Norwegians who like to use the prize to make a statement. The committee admits he has done nothing yet to deserve the reward. But they are European liberals, and European liberals hate America but love American leaders who hate America as much as they do.

yyz28 · October 9, 2009

The Nobel Prize lost all credibility when it was given to Arafat. Pretty well irrelevant gesture so far as I can tell.

hickoryhouse · October 9, 2009

Editorial form TIME on this Nobel Prize

Green P1 · October 9, 2009

But they are European liberals, and European liberals hate America but love American leaders who hate America as much as they do.

Bho

Recommended Posts

Join the conversation

Who's Online 8 Members, 1 Anonymous, 163 Guests (See full list)

Images

Tell a friend

What's going on Mean Green?

Popular Contributors

Member Statistics

Most Points

Biggest Gamblers

Important Information