You are posting as a guest.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
I get that and I agree. I think there needs to be less reviews (or at least less time per review), but I also think it’s ridiculous to say, “They obviously missed that call, but it’s not reviewable.” I mean they speaks 5 minutes reviewing a spot to move the ball 6”, but they don’t review the two 15 yard penalties I mentioned? Hell, refs mis-spot the ball a little bit all the time, but we’re not reviewing that (thank goodness).
Replay should be used only for clearly egregious calls. Honestly, I don’t think I’d be opposed to only reviewing at game speed. If you can’t tell in game speed, it’s not egregious. On top of that, look how many times they go to review and still miss the call. There were about 3-4 at least in our game vs TxSt.
Bottom line: Replay needs A LOT of tweaking.
Pretty sure we used that Forest Green during the Dickey era.
I'd just like to see us be very picky about which one we ARE, and be consistent about using it.
2024 is the first year I can remember we did not have a couple of stud RB's. I know there were a lot of injuries. Does anybody have any vision to what the room will look like in 2025?
I'm guessing that @ColoradoEagle means above and beyond that 152 number. A program that would compete for NCAA bids while in the American.
Be very picky, demanding for this invite or don't invite at all.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.