Voter Fraud In California

EagleD · June 22, 2009

While the (Republican) national party spent much of the last campaign bitching about Acorn and Democratic voter fraud, the California GOP hired Mark Anthony Jacoby (ph) and his business, Young Political Majors, to lead its voter registration efforts in California. Mr. Jacoby has pleaded now guilty to voter registration fraud in Los Angeles.
There is no vague association between the Republicans and Young Political Majors, like that between Acorn and the Democrats. The “L.A. Times” says Jacoby got between seven and 12 bucks for every person he registered as a Republican, and he often tricked people by saying they were signing a petition to toughen penalties against child molesters. Jacoby and Young Political Majors are also under investigating in Florida and Massachusetts. They have been sued in Arizona.
So they say Acorn, you say Young Political Majors.

Mean Green 93-98 · June 22, 2009

So they say Acorn, you say Young Political Majors.

Ah, what a defense--"you're just as bad."

Both of these groups need to be shut down, not used as justification for the other.

KRAM1 · June 22, 2009

Bad is bad...doesn't matter which side you are on...did this guy just sign up folks as "Republicans" under fraudulent means or did he sign up unqualified voters as "Republicans"? A bit different than actually seeing unqualified votes at the polls. Bad yes none the less, but did anyone actually vote through a fraudulent means????

Quoner · June 22, 2009

Bad is bad...doesn't matter which side you are on...did this guy just sign up folks as "Republicans" under fraudulent means or did he sign up unqualified voters as "Republicans"? A bit different than actually seeing unqualified votes at the polls. Bad yes none the less, but did anyone actually vote through a fraudulent means????

To summarize in one sentence:

Bad is bad, but this is less bad.

Both of these groups need to be shut down, not used as justification for the other. I'd like to assume that MG93-98 is talking about both political parties at this point, because their combined chief output is horseshit.

Rudy · June 23, 2009

Mark Jacoby of YPM
From Olbermann:

Congrats, you've gotten yourself off at the expense of the Republican party. *Tosses you a washrag*

UNTflyer · June 23, 2009

Mark Jacoby of YPM
From Olbermann:
"There is no vague association between the Republicans and Young Political Majors, like that between Acorn and the Democrats."

HAHAHAHA! Oh, that wacky Olbermann.

UNTflyer · June 23, 2009

Mark Jacoby of YPM
From Olbermann:
"So they say Acorn, you say Young Political Majors."

Catchy. I'm sure all 27 of Olbermann's viewers will take their marching orders and spread this phrase at the next Secret 9/11 Conspiracy Meeting Held in Mom's Basement.

Rudy · June 23, 2009

Catchy. I'm sure all 27 of Olbermann's viewers will take their marching orders and spread this phrase at the next Secret 9/11 Conspiracy Meeting Held in Mom's Basement.

He's got 27 now? Wow, good week for Keith.

emmitt01 · June 23, 2009

When will you learn Eagle D? Any attempt to say that the democratic party in general, and PRESIDENT Obama in specific, are not the devil will be met with much furor and asinine arguments.

Rudy · June 23, 2009

When will you learn Eagle D? Any attempt to say that the democratic party in general, and PRESIDENT Obama in specific, are not the devil will be met with much furor and asinine arguments.

he wasnt saying that the Demoratic Party was not evil. he was just having fun taking a shot at the right.

eulesseagle · June 23, 2009

Aw now emmitt,

Conservatives do not think that Hussain Obama is the devil. We just know that he is socailist. Google his past. Oh yea, you already have and support socialism. That is fine because we all have to support something and higher taxes and a bankrupt country is something to laud over conservatives.

As you know emmitt ACORN was patterned on Saul D. Alinsky's organizational recommendations. Of course you know Hussain Obama's running buddies "were" and "are" today....Alinsky and Ayers. Both avid socialists.

What is amazing is that ACORN, like the NAACP (in many respects), tend to treat the poor as exploited units human capital much the same way the Socialist Democratic party have used their primary voting blocks. Now we "all" (including emmitt and EagleD) financially support the largest and growing, highest paid, fattest, most hospital prone, non-working welfare population ever. To a socialist democrat this is "GREAT" news. WHY??? Need more rich to support the ever growing poor so we can "redistribute" the wealth. I am looking forward to that day, in America, like Cuba and all the other socialist countries where someone working at a "Donut Shop" makes the same as Officer Emmitt.

In the final analysis we are all nothing but "pawns" in a giant chess game of life being manipulated by the other major pieces ready to be "sacrificed" at the whim of winning someone else's game.

_________________

On a side note.....I am really not looking forward to having ACORN in charge of or any part of the census.....for obvious reasons. For a socalist....this is good..........for a conservative this would be ...... bad.

Edited June 23, 2009 by eulesseagle

keith · June 23, 2009

This is such a weird thing. You seem so gleeful that it was not ACORN this time. Voter registration fraud is reprehensible regardless who commits it. The big difference is that ACORN receives millions of dollars of FEDERAL funding. Money that belongs to you and me. So that makes you and me party to this act and that, quite frankly, pisses me off.

Keith

emmitt01 · June 23, 2009

Aw now emmitt,
Conservatives do not think that Hussain Obama is the devil. We just know that he is socailist. Google his past. Oh yea, you already have and support socialism. That is fine because we all have to support something and higher taxes and a bankrupt country is something to laud over conservatives.
As you know emmitt ACORN was patterned on Saul D. Alinsky's organizational recommendations. Of course you know Hussain Obama's running buddies "were" and "are" today....Alinsky and Ayers. Both avid socialists.
What is amazing is that ACORN, like the NAACP (in many respects), tend to treat the poor as exploited units human capital much the same way the Socialist Democratic party have used their primary voting blocks. Now we "all" (including emmitt and EagleD) financially support the largest and growing, highest paid, fattest, most hospital prone, non-working welfare population ever. To a socialist democrat this is "GREAT" news. WHY??? Need more rich to support the ever growing poor so we can "redistribute" the wealth. I am looking forward to that day, in America, like Cuba and all the other socialist countries where someone working at a "Donut Shop" makes the same as Officer Emmitt.
In the final analysis we are all nothing but "pawns" in a giant chess game of life being manipulated by the other major pieces ready to be "sacrificed" at the whim of winning someone else's game.
_________________
On a side note.....I am really not looking forward to having ACORN in charge of or any part of the census.....for obvious reasons. For a socalist....this is good..........for a conservative this would be ...... bad.

I used to think Plumm was the most capable of writing paragraph upon paragraph of pointless drivel. No longer.

Censored by Laurie · June 23, 2009

I used to think Plumm was the most capable of writing paragraph upon paragraph of pointless drivel. No longer.

The guy is just balls out crazy.

(since you're going to just reply to Emmitt's post by saying that all he can revert to is ad hominem attacks and how disappointed you are that he is a graduate of UNT, I figured I'd give you an actual ad hominem, though oh so true, attack to make you look slightly less of a douche. Ya know...just lookin' out)

emmitt01 · June 23, 2009

The guy is just balls out crazy.
(since you're going to just reply to Emmitt's post by saying that all he can revert to is ad hominem attacks and how disappointed you are that he is a graduate of UNT, I figured I'd give you an actual ad hominem, though oh so true, attack to make you look slightly less of a douche. Ya know...just lookin' out)

If he were just balls out crazy I wouldn't bother with the responses. Instead he's the bane of all good conversations...the "non-traditional student." We all remember the non-traditional student. He's the 40 something guy (not saying EE is forty something, just that the image I am evoking is forty something for referential purposes) in pretty much every college class you took who couldn't help raising his hand and beating down the rest of the students at least once a class session. He never added anything of substance, just wanted to point out how much better read he was than the rest of you and buried just below the surface of his every comment was his quiet condescension.

KRAM1 · June 23, 2009

Eulesseagle...hang in there. You know you have "arrived" when the postings turn more "personal". I was waiting for it to happen to ya! :lol: :lol:

eulesseagle · June 23, 2009

KRAM1-

Thanks buddy. What puzzles me is why emmitt, et.al. supports the same policies, in reverse, as his progenitors fought so hard to change?

________________

PMG's posts were more in line with football instead of politics. I can only imagine PMG writing one of his epistles on politics.

________________

emmitt, thanks for the reading compliment. I do read a great deal. I read just about anything from I.V. Lennin (on the left) to the right. Fortunately, I have no problem with either. WHY?? because no one side has a monopoly on ideas. You may think my comments are hidden by, as you put it by, "quite condenscention," but is it really because I read a "variety" of philosophies or ideas where as you are "limiting" yourself to myoptic views?

Edited June 23, 2009 by eulesseagle

emmitt01 · June 23, 2009

KRAM1-
Thanks buddy. What puzzles me is why emmitt, et.al. supports the same policies, in reverse, as his progenitors fought so hard to change?

"Concentrate on the hot chick in the class Emmitt, concentrate on the hot chick. Pay no attention to someone's grandpa, he doesn't know any better."

UNTLifer · June 23, 2009

Man, I'm glad I'm not a moderator on this board and trying to figure out what amounts to personal attacks towards other posters. Is it only comments, could it be someone's avatar, not sure where the line is drawn on this one? It sure seems to me that it has become more lenient, but I'm not going to test the waters considering I've been banned twice and as far as I can tell, only have three more strikes. :lol: