-
Tell a friend
-
What's going on Mean Green?
-
1
House v. NCAA settlement: Approval awaits in landmark case as judge digs in on roster limits
I assume ours will be similar Revenue-sharing formula: Many schools are preparing to mirror the back-payment formula in their revenue-sharing model for the future. That means roughly 75% of future revenue will be shared with football players, 15% to men's basketball, 5% to women's basketball and 5% to all remaining sports. Those numbers will differ from school to school, but most power programs have shared similar models with administrators. -
1
House v. NCAA settlement: Approval awaits in landmark case as judge digs in on roster limits
House v. NCAA settlement terms$2.77 billion in back payments to as many as 390,000 athletes who played an NCAA sport between 2016 and 2024. NIL deals must meet "fair market value." How that fair-market value is determined is the subject of intense debate. The long-expected approval of a landmark antitrust case allowing college players to be paid directly by schools is on hold for at least one week. The federal judge presiding over the House v. NCAA case requested attorneys make additional tweaks to the settlement's terms regarding roster limits and whether future players should be tied to the current class in the multi-billion dollar lawsuit. A final approval could come upon receipt of those tweaks from attorneys, though that might not happen for several weeks. "Basically, I think it's a good settlement," said Judge Claudia Wilken of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. "Don't quote me. I think it's worth pursuing and I think some of these things can be fixed if people tried to fix them." The House settlement would allow schools to directly pay players millions of dollars starting July 1. Each school's revenue-sharing formula would be capped at $20.5 million, with the pool increasing 4% each year during the 10-year agreement. The $2.8 billion in back payments for athletes who competed between 2016 and 2024 would also be set in motion upon Wilken's approval. read more: https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/house-v-ncaa-settlement-approval-awaits-in-landmark-case-as-judge-digs-in-on-roster-limits/amp/ -
1
-
1
Update on UTSA NIL
UTSA Family, Time is running out to experience UTSA Football like never before! As a Runners United subscriber, you'll be entered to win a complete VIP experience for four at a UTSA Football game, including: Pregame field passes to watch warmups up close Special access to high-five players in the team tunnel Exclusive Touchdown Club hospitality passes Premium complimentary game tickets But that's not all - your subscription directly strengthens UTSA athletics while giving you amazing benefits throughout the year: Exclusive welcome package with UTSA gear Monthly prize giveaway entries Live Q&A sessions with coaches Early access to UTSA content The April 26 deadline approaches quickly. Subscribe today and elevate your UTSA Football experience! Subscribe Now- 1
-
-
7
NT Portal Entries
So we will not have anyone returning from this year's team. Weird, but it seems like that may be the way it's going to be going forward. Unless you can get a day 1 starter (unlikely), I don't know why we (or anyone else in our position) would ever recruit a high school player again just to have them sit on the bench for a year or two and then leave without getting any meaningful production.- 2
-
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Most Points
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Biggest Gamblers
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.