Obama Liberal?

[Quoner]

These stats came from various place but most came from gay publications and websites

This one? (SFW)

Also, I want to post this now because it's old and I am bored:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="

name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="

type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[SilverEagle]

what about the religious right thats not crazy?

I love the bumper sticker that says "The Religious Right is neither one".

[e-bone ver2.awesome]

You're asking the wrong person. Try to find someone a little right of Trotsky.

Indeed.

[greenminer]

How would we classify 2 girls, 1 cup?

Baskin Robbins HAWTNESS.

[UNT_playmaker]

Whatever - the gays had their turn with that Brokeback Mountain crap. I want more Bruckheimer/Bay 'splosions! Yeehawwww!!!!!!!!! BOOM!

Exactly I want to see a Bad Boys 3 made so bad..... and it would be tight if it was filmed in the DFW area....

[Quoner]

Can we all just agree that gays are terrible, evil, and disgusting creatures? I think they should be forced to wear a very specific rainbow logo on all of their clothing. That way they can't trick us by acting all straight sometimes. They can be so deceptive.... ugh... I'm shivering just thinking about them.

Not true..."they're a clean people and have been ever since they came over from France"

[UNTLifer]

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?.../MN5614QUKR.DTL

Like all successful politicians, he's a centrist.

I have always believed that Obama wasn't (and isn't) against gay marriage, even though he stated the opposite to keep the bat-$h_t-crazy religious right from mounting much of an offense against him. I think he is going to engage that crazy faction more and more and (metaphorically speaking), slowly and regularly, slip a little lithium into their drinks.

I think that the gay community will eventually get their right to marry, Obama just needs to distract the crazy religious right long enough. And that will take a little time.

He just states that he's not against gay marriage to keepthe "bat-$h_t" gay/lesbian left from mounting much of an offense against him. Maybe he's just distracting the crazy gay left long enough to not pass it.

There, fixed it for ya.

[KingDL1]

Your own posts continue to provide such unintentional humor

That is the problem of being busy at work, I try to type when I am on the phone and it is sometimes halfassed.

[meangreendork]

That is the problem of being busy at work, I try to type when I am on the phone and it is sometimes halfassed.

I've tried that, and on a good day, my typing is half-assed.

[Bryan316]

[SCREAMING EAGLE-66]

I don't give a care about social policies, but Obama is clearly a liberal when it comes to economics, taxes, and expanding federal power.

That's all I got to say about that.

---The current administration's policy of removing federal regulations on business and Wall Steet has really worked out well hasn't it.

---Personally I don't trust those guys (financial and business execs.) when money is involved and they personally can get more of it... especially at the cost of the investors and tax-payers.

I think you listen to Rush too much or at least believe all the BS those type of guys put out. What is truth is and what they claim it is, is not the same at all.

[UNTFan23]

---The current administration's policy of removing federal regulations on business and Wall Steet has really worked out well hasn't it.

You mean like when Clinton and Co. made it easier for Freddie and Frannie to make loans to more Americans, allowing people to buy more home than they could afford? How's that working out for us again?

Finally, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 came during the Bush Administration. That is about as far away as you can get from the removal of federal regulation as you can.

The government always over-corrects when it comes to regulation of business. I expect the same in response to the financial/housing difficulties we are in right now.

[eulesseagle]

http://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics...rStatistcs.html

everything is footnoted at the bottom of the article......

Edited December 21, 2008 by eulesseagle

[Bryan316]

You mean like when Clinton and Co. made it easier for Freddie and Frannie to make loans to more Americans, allowing people to buy more home than they could afford? How's that working out for us again?

Did you miss the links in one of the previous political pissing-contest threads about how private companies made more of these loans than everyone's two favorite scapegoats.

[UNTFan23]

Did you miss the links in one of the previous political pissing-contest threads about how private companies made more of these loans than everyone's two favorite scapegoats.

Fred and Fan also brokered a lot of the mortgages for those companies. Needless to say, it was the Democratic led initiative to get more people in to homes, even if it meant buying more house than they could afford.

[GreenMachine]

Did you miss the links in one of the previous political pissing-contest threads about how private companies made more of these loans than everyone's two favorite scapegoats.

BS. Countrywide was the #1 lender of ARMS, IO's and HELOC's in the country, followed by several other large PUBLIC companies. A private lender wasn't even in the top 10.

[Coffee and TV]

You mean like when Clinton and Co. made it easier for Freddie and Frannie to make loans to more Americans, allowing people to buy more home than they could afford?

Um. They didn't.

Fred and Fannie don't make the subprime loans that caused the current housing crisis.

[Coffee and TV]

BS. Countrywide was the #1 lender of ARMS, IO's and HELOC's in the country, followed by several other large PUBLIC companies. A private lender wasn't even in the top 10.

Public = not government backed (at least until the bailout) in this situation.