Some Scary Stuff From Former Obama Staffer

PlummMeanGreen · November 4, 2008

WOW! A very powerful post from an ex Obama campaign staffer: Please read and send to your entire computer address book! You will not believe what this lady has to say--it's pretty darn scary stuff about B. Huseein Obama, fellow Americans.

--------------------------------------

Huli1:26PMNov 2nd 2008

From a person who is from Obama's campaign office.

A Hillary staffer comes clean Blog Posted by: Anonymous_14 Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 04:52PM CDT

After a long and careful consideration of all the implications and possible consequences of my actions today, I have decided to go through with this in the hope that our country can indeed be guided into the right direction. First, a little personal background… I am a female grad student in my 20’s, and a registered Democrat. During the primaries, I was a campaign worker for the Clinton candidacy. I believed in her and still do, staying all the way to the bitter end. And believe me, it was bitter. The snippets you’ve heard from various media outlets only grazed the surface. There was no love between the Clinton and Obama campaigns, and these feelings extended all the way to the top. Hillary was no dope though, and knew that any endorsement of Obama must appear to be a full-fledged one. She did this out of political survival. As a part of his overall effort to extend an olive branch to the Clinton camp and her supporters, Obama took on a few Hillary staff members into his campaign. I was one such worker. Though I was still bitterly loyal to Hillary, I still held out hope that he would choose her as VP. In fact, there was a consensus among us transplants that in the end, he HAD to choose her. It was the only logical choice. I also was committed to the Democratic cause and without much of a second thought, transferred my allegiance to Senator Obama. I’m going to let you in on a few secrets here, and this is not because I enjoy the gossip or the attention directed my way. I’m doing this because I doubt much of you know the true weaknesses of Obama. Another reason for my doing this is that I am lost faith in this campaign, and feel that this choice has been forced on many people in this country. Put simply, you are being manipulated. That was and is our job – to manipulate you (the electorate) and the media (we already had them months ago). Our goal is to create chaos with the other side, not hope. I’ve come to the realization (as the campaign already has) that if this comes to the issues, Barack Obama doesn’t have a chance. His only chance is to foster disorganization, chaos, despair, and a sense of inevitability among the Republicans. It has worked up until now. Joe the Plumber has put the focus on the issues again, and this scares us more than anything. Being in a position to know these things, I will rate what the Obama campaign already knows are their weak links from the most important on down. 1 – Hillary voters. Internal polling suggests that at best, we are taking 70-75% of these voters. Other estimates are as low as 60% in some areas – particularly Ohio and western PA. My biggest problem with this campaign’s strategy was the decision NOT to offer Hillary the VP slot. She was ready and able to take this on, and would have campaigned enthusiastically for it. This selection would have also brought virtually all of her supporters into the fold, and the Obama campaign knew it. Though I have no way of knowing this for certain, and I do admit that I am relying on internal gossip, Senator Obama actually went against the advice of his top advisors. They wanted him to choose her, but the only significant opposition to this within the campaign came from Barack and Michelle Obama. In short, he let personal feelings take precedence over what was the most logical thing to do. Biden, by the way, has been a disaster inside the campaign. Everyone cringes whenever he gives an interview, and he creates so many headaches as the campaign has to stay on their toes in order to disseminate information and spin whatever it was he was trying to say. 2 – Sarah Palin. Don’t believe what the media is telling you about how horrible a choice she was. Again, our internal polling suggest that though she has had a minimal impact on pulling disaffected Hillary Democrats to McCain, she has done wonders in mobilizing the base for McCain. Another thing – we were completely taken by surprise with her pick. In my capacity in the research department, I looked into the backgrounds of Leiberman, Romney, Pawlenty and Ridge, and prepared briefs. I don’t mind bragging that we had pretty good stuff on all of them. With Leiberman, the plan was to paint him as an erratic old-timer who didn’t have a clue as to what he was doing (pretty much a clone of McCain). In Romney, we had him pegged as an evil capitalist who cut jobs. Pawlenty was going to get the “Quayle treatment”, or more precisely: a pretty face, with no valid experience. Tom Ridge was going to be used to provide a direct link from McCain to Bush. As you can see, we were quite enamored of all of them. Then the unexpected happened – Sarah Palin. We had no clue as to how to handle her, and bungled it from the start. Though through our misinformation networks, we have successfully taken some of the shine off. But let there be no doubt. She remains a major obstacle. She has singlehanded solidified “soft” Republican support, mobilized the McCain ground game, and has even had some appeal to independents and Hillary voters. This is what our internal polling confirms. 3 – Obama’s radical connections. Standards operating procedure has been to cry “racism” whenever one of these has been brought up. We even have a detailed strategy ready to go should McCain ever bring Rev. Wright up. Though by themselves they are of minimal worth, taken together, Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Father Pfelger, and now, Rashid Khalili, are exactly what the campaign does not need. The more focus on them, the more this election becomes a referendum on Obama. The campaign strategy from the very beginning was to make this election a referendum on Bush. Strategists have been banging their head on how successfully McCain has distanced himself from Bush. This has worked, and right now the tide is in his favor. People are taking a new look at Barack Obama, and our experience when this happens tells us this is not good news at all. When they take a look at him, one or more of these names are bound to be brought up. McCain has wisely not harped on this in recent weeks and let voters decide for themselves. This was a trap we set for him, and he never fully took the bait. Senator Obama openly dared him to bring up Ayers. This was not due to machismo on the part of Obama, but actually due to campaign strategy. Though McCain’s reference to Ayers fell flat in the last debate, people in the Obama campaign were actually disappointed that he didn’t follow through on it more and getting into it. Our focus groups found this out: When McCain brings these connections up, voters are turned off to him. They’d rather take this into consideration themselves, and when this happens, our numbers begin to tank. 4 – The Bradley Effect. Don’t believe these polls for a second. I just went over our numbers and found that we have next to no chance in the following states: Missouri, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, New Hampshire and Nevada. Ohio leans heavily to McCain, but is too close to call it for him. Virginia, Pennsylvania, Colorado, New Mexico and Iowa are the true “toss up states”. The only two of these the campaign feels “confident” in are Iowa and New Mexico. The reason for such polling discrepancy is the Bradley Effect, and this is a subject of much discussion in the campaign. In general, we tend to take a -10 point percentage in allowing for this, and are not comfortable until the polls give us a spread well over this mark. This is why we are still campaigning in Virginia and Pennsylvania! This is why Ohio is such a desperate hope for us! What truly bothers this campaign is the fact that some pollsters get up to an 80% “refuse to respond” result. You can’t possibly include these into the polls. The truth is, people are afraid to let people know who they are voting for. The vast majority of these respondents are McCain supporters. Obama is the “hip” choice, and we all know it. As part of my research duties, I scour right wing blogs and websites to get somewhat of a “feel” as to what is being talked about on the other side. Much of it is nonsense, but there are some exceptions which give the campaign jitters. A spirited campaign has been made to infiltrate many pro-Hillary sites and discredit them. A more disorganized, but genuine effort has also been made to sow doubts among the unapologetically right wing sites such as redstate.com. Don’t you guys get it? This has been the Obama campaign’s sole strategy from the very beginning! The only way he wins is over a dispirited, disorganized, and demobilized opposition. This is how it has been for all of his campaigns. What surprises me is that everyone has fallen for it. You may point to the polls as proof of the inevitability of all of this. If so, you have fallen for the oldest trick in the book. How did we skew these polls, you might ask? It all starts with the media “buzz” which has been generated over the campaign. Many stories are generated on the powerful Obama ground game, and how many new voters were registered. None of this happens by coincidence. It is all part of the poll-skewing process. This makes pollsters change their mixes to reflect these new voters and tilt the mix more towards Democratic voters. What is not mentioned or reported on is not the “under-reported cell phone users or young voters” we hear so much about. What is underreported is you. I changed my somewhat positive opinion of this campaign during the unfair and sexist campaign against Sarah Palin. I will never agree with her on the issues and will probably never vote for her, but I am embarrassed of what has happened. I can’t ignore our own hand in all of this. What I do know is that I will not be voting for Obama this time around. Treat that as you will. This isn’t about race This isn’t about black or white This is about TRUTH The American people deserve the truth…it is their lives at risk….

Dr. Rev Stanley said,,, the first signs of tyranny is when the TRUTH is being silenced

WE AS AMERICANS DESERVE THE TRUTH ABOUT “BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S” SHADY PAST …..

TERRORIST, COMMUNISTS, HAMA’S, CORRUPTION, SOCIALISM

VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN!!!!!

untbowler · November 4, 2008

left-wing talking points in 5-4-3-2-1...........

Quoner · November 4, 2008

I've already voted (not for Obama) and have no talking points, but I've only seen this on 2 conservative blogs and an NYC craigslist account along with some livejournal type crap sites.

It's not on Snopes yet, but I have trouble buying into these crazy "secret" emails when there have been so many false ones passed around in the last year or so.

meangreenacct · November 4, 2008

WOW! A very powerful post from an ex Obama campaign staffer: Please read and send to your entire computer address book! You will not believe what this lady has to say--it's pretty darn scary stuff about B. Huseein Obama, fellow Americans.
--------------------------------------
Huli1:26PMNov 2nd 2008
From a person who is from Obama's campaign office.
A Hillary staffer comes clean Blog Posted by: Anonymous_14 Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 04:52PM CDT
After a long and careful consideration of all the implications and possible consequences of my actions today, I have decided to go through with this in the hope that our country can indeed be guided into the right direction. First, a little personal background… I am a female grad student in my 20’s, and a registered Democrat. During the primaries, I was a campaign worker for the Clinton candidacy. I believed in her and still do, staying all the way to the bitter end. And believe me, it was bitter. The snippets you’ve heard from various media outlets only grazed the surface. There was no love between the Clinton and Obama campaigns, and these feelings extended all the way to the top. Hillary was no dope though, and knew that any endorsement of Obama must appear to be a full-fledged one. She did this out of political survival. As a part of his overall effort to extend an olive branch to the Clinton camp and her supporters, Obama took on a few Hillary staff members into his campaign. I was one such worker. Though I was still bitterly loyal to Hillary, I still held out hope that he would choose her as VP. In fact, there was a consensus among us transplants that in the end, he HAD to choose her. It was the only logical choice. I also was committed to the Democratic cause and without much of a second thought, transferred my allegiance to Senator Obama. I’m going to let you in on a few secrets here, and this is not because I enjoy the gossip or the attention directed my way. I’m doing this because I doubt much of you know the true weaknesses of Obama. Another reason for my doing this is that I am lost faith in this campaign, and feel that this choice has been forced on many people in this country. Put simply, you are being manipulated. That was and is our job – to manipulate you (the electorate) and the media (we already had them months ago). Our goal is to create chaos with the other side, not hope. I’ve come to the realization (as the campaign already has) that if this comes to the issues, Barack Obama doesn’t have a chance. His only chance is to foster disorganization, chaos, despair, and a sense of inevitability among the Republicans. It has worked up until now. Joe the Plumber has put the focus on the issues again, and this scares us more than anything. Being in a position to know these things, I will rate what the Obama campaign already knows are their weak links from the most important on down. 1 – Hillary voters. Internal polling suggests that at best, we are taking 70-75% of these voters. Other estimates are as low as 60% in some areas – particularly Ohio and western PA. My biggest problem with this campaign’s strategy was the decision NOT to offer Hillary the VP slot. She was ready and able to take this on, and would have campaigned enthusiastically for it. This selection would have also brought virtually all of her supporters into the fold, and the Obama campaign knew it. Though I have no way of knowing this for certain, and I do admit that I am relying on internal gossip, Senator Obama actually went against the advice of his top advisors. They wanted him to choose her, but the only significant opposition to this within the campaign came from Barack and Michelle Obama. In short, he let personal feelings take precedence over what was the most logical thing to do. Biden, by the way, has been a disaster inside the campaign. Everyone cringes whenever he gives an interview, and he creates so many headaches as the campaign has to stay on their toes in order to disseminate information and spin whatever it was he was trying to say. 2 – Sarah Palin. Don’t believe what the media is telling you about how horrible a choice she was. Again, our internal polling suggest that though she has had a minimal impact on pulling disaffected Hillary Democrats to McCain, she has done wonders in mobilizing the base for McCain. Another thing – we were completely taken by surprise with her pick. In my capacity in the research department, I looked into the backgrounds of Leiberman, Romney, Pawlenty and Ridge, and prepared briefs. I don’t mind bragging that we had pretty good stuff on all of them. With Leiberman, the plan was to paint him as an erratic old-timer who didn’t have a clue as to what he was doing (pretty much a clone of McCain). In Romney, we had him pegged as an evil capitalist who cut jobs. Pawlenty was going to get the “Quayle treatment”, or more precisely: a pretty face, with no valid experience. Tom Ridge was going to be used to provide a direct link from McCain to Bush. As you can see, we were quite enamored of all of them. Then the unexpected happened – Sarah Palin. We had no clue as to how to handle her, and bungled it from the start. Though through our misinformation networks, we have successfully taken some of the shine off. But let there be no doubt. She remains a major obstacle. She has singlehanded solidified “soft” Republican support, mobilized the McCain ground game, and has even had some appeal to independents and Hillary voters. This is what our internal polling confirms. 3 – Obama’s radical connections. Standards operating procedure has been to cry “racism” whenever one of these has been brought up. We even have a detailed strategy ready to go should McCain ever bring Rev. Wright up. Though by themselves they are of minimal worth, taken together, Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Father Pfelger, and now, Rashid Khalili, are exactly what the campaign does not need. The more focus on them, the more this election becomes a referendum on Obama. The campaign strategy from the very beginning was to make this election a referendum on Bush. Strategists have been banging their head on how successfully McCain has distanced himself from Bush. This has worked, and right now the tide is in his favor. People are taking a new look at Barack Obama, and our experience when this happens tells us this is not good news at all. When they take a look at him, one or more of these names are bound to be brought up. McCain has wisely not harped on this in recent weeks and let voters decide for themselves. This was a trap we set for him, and he never fully took the bait. Senator Obama openly dared him to bring up Ayers. This was not due to machismo on the part of Obama, but actually due to campaign strategy. Though McCain’s reference to Ayers fell flat in the last debate, people in the Obama campaign were actually disappointed that he didn’t follow through on it more and getting into it. Our focus groups found this out: When McCain brings these connections up, voters are turned off to him. They’d rather take this into consideration themselves, and when this happens, our numbers begin to tank. 4 – The Bradley Effect. Don’t believe these polls for a second. I just went over our numbers and found that we have next to no chance in the following states: Missouri, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, New Hampshire and Nevada. Ohio leans heavily to McCain, but is too close to call it for him. Virginia, Pennsylvania, Colorado, New Mexico and Iowa are the true “toss up states”. The only two of these the campaign feels “confident” in are Iowa and New Mexico. The reason for such polling discrepancy is the Bradley Effect, and this is a subject of much discussion in the campaign. In general, we tend to take a -10 point percentage in allowing for this, and are not comfortable until the polls give us a spread well over this mark. This is why we are still campaigning in Virginia and Pennsylvania! This is why Ohio is such a desperate hope for us! What truly bothers this campaign is the fact that some pollsters get up to an 80% “refuse to respond” result. You can’t possibly include these into the polls. The truth is, people are afraid to let people know who they are voting for. The vast majority of these respondents are McCain supporters. Obama is the “hip” choice, and we all know it. As part of my research duties, I scour right wing blogs and websites to get somewhat of a “feel” as to what is being talked about on the other side. Much of it is nonsense, but there are some exceptions which give the campaign jitters. A spirited campaign has been made to infiltrate many pro-Hillary sites and discredit them. A more disorganized, but genuine effort has also been made to sow doubts among the unapologetically right wing sites such as redstate.com. Don’t you guys get it? This has been the Obama campaign’s sole strategy from the very beginning! The only way he wins is over a dispirited, disorganized, and demobilized opposition. This is how it has been for all of his campaigns. What surprises me is that everyone has fallen for it. You may point to the polls as proof of the inevitability of all of this. If so, you have fallen for the oldest trick in the book. How did we skew these polls, you might ask? It all starts with the media “buzz” which has been generated over the campaign. Many stories are generated on the powerful Obama ground game, and how many new voters were registered. None of this happens by coincidence. It is all part of the poll-skewing process. This makes pollsters change their mixes to reflect these new voters and tilt the mix more towards Democratic voters. What is not mentioned or reported on is not the “under-reported cell phone users or young voters” we hear so much about. What is underreported is you. I changed my somewhat positive opinion of this campaign during the unfair and sexist campaign against Sarah Palin. I will never agree with her on the issues and will probably never vote for her, but I am embarrassed of what has happened. I can’t ignore our own hand in all of this. What I do know is that I will not be voting for Obama this time around. Treat that as you will. This isn’t about race This isn’t about black or white This is about TRUTH The American people deserve the truth…it is their lives at risk….
Dr. Rev Stanley said,,, the first signs of tyranny is when the TRUTH is being silenced
WE AS AMERICANS DESERVE THE TRUTH ABOUT “BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S” SHADY PAST …..
TERRORIST, COMMUNISTS, HAMA’S, CORRUPTION, SOCIALISM
VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN!!!!!

You are probably right, I won't believe what this lady has to say. I am always leary of anonymous posts on the internet such as this and I hope others would be as well. If this was ligit (and maybe even if it wasn't), I guarantee it would have gotten more play (Fox News maybe?).

meangreendork · November 4, 2008

It's like the emails and random craigslist postings that tell us about how some random scheme in Kenya is going to net us $1000 or how Bill Gates and his charity are going to get us paid for every email we send. We'll wait and see.

But I would figure something legit would be all over the news, especially tonight.

meangreenacct · November 4, 2008

It's like the emails and random craigslist postings that tell us about how some random scheme in Kenya is going to net us $1000 or how Bill Gates and his charity are going to get us paid for every email we send. We'll wait and see.
But I would figure something legit would be all over the news, especially tonight.

You get the same amazing business opportunity e-mails? I thought I was special!

meangreendork · November 4, 2008

You get the same amazing business opportunity e-mails? I thought I was special!

I must be pimpin' too since I get a lot of emails about women I've never heard of who want hook up with me. Also, my girlfriend's car warranty ran out, so I need to get her a new warranty so we can protect the car she doesn't have. Man, I love email! It's all I need to know about everything!

NT03 · November 4, 2008

WOW! A very powerful post from an ex Obama campaign staffer: Please read and send to your entire computer address book! You will not believe what this lady has to say--it's pretty darn scary stuff about B. Huseein Obama, fellow Americans.
--------------------------------------
Huli1:26PMNov 2nd 2008
From a person who is from Obama's campaign office.
A Hillary staffer comes clean Blog Posted by: Anonymous_14 Thursday, October 30, 2008 at 04:52PM CDT

How clean can you really come if your Anonymous :huh:

Edited November 4, 2008 by NT03

UNTFan23 · November 4, 2008

It's like the emails and random craigslist postings that tell us about how some random scheme in Kenya is going to net us $1000 or how Bill Gates and his charity are going to get us paid for every email we send. We'll wait and see.

You mean ... those aren't real? :cry:

FirefightnRick · November 4, 2008

How clean can you really come if your Anonymous

Possibly a person who recieved it and then re-posted it on a separate blog.

Really, some of what is in the email isn't anything we haven't heard already. When Hillary's fundraising campaign leader, Lynn Forester de Rothschild decided to throw her full support to John McCain she also spoke on Fox about how much of a curve that the Palin pick threw the Obama campaign. And much of the email is simply about the strategies, which is part of any campaign. You have to have a game plan and there is little doubt they succeeded with the media. We'll probably hear who the email is from in a week or so?

Rick

Edited November 4, 2008 by FirefightnRick

GoMeanGreen1999 · November 4, 2008

Possibly a person who recieved it and then re-posted it on a separate blog.
Really, some of what is in the email isn't anything we haven't heard already. When Hillary's fundraising campaign leader, Lynn Forester de Rothschild decided to throw her full support to John McCain she also spoke on Fox about how much of a curve that the Palin pick threw the Obama campaign. And much of the email is simply about the strategies, which is part of any campaign. You have to have a game plan and there is little doubt they succeeded with the media. We'll probably hear who the email is from in a week or so?
Rick

I found it funny that Obama went to Hawaii last week and "sealed" his birth certificate. If he has nothing to hide, why not allow everyone to see his birth certificate?

November 4, 2008

I found it funny that Obama went to Hawaii last week and "sealed" his birth certificate. If he has nothing to hide, why not allow everyone to see his birth certificate?

Not this again... What can he be hiding? Obama's mother was American, and she by all accounts actually birthed him like any human woman births her son... that makes him (drum roll) an AMERICAN. Despite where it happens.. or when... on a cruise ship in the middle of uncharted waters, or in the air over Mexico... he would still be an American. Are bureaucracies, like hospitals, so air tight that mistakes don't happen? How the hell did he ever get into school with a birth certificate? You don't think he hasn't crossed this bridge many times? I had to provide a birth certificate to get a drivers license... that sucked to track down. I don't even know if I provided a legal copy. I just had something faxed over.

Constitution:

No person except a natural born citizen,OR a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

If it said "AND"... then perhaps it is a story. It sayd "OR", so ... well...

Is McCain really a legal presidential candidate? He is born, after all, on (drum roll) foreign land .

We all know the answer. It doesn't seem like too hard of a conclusion to draw.

FirefightnRick · November 4, 2008

Not this again... What can he be hiding? Obama's mother was American, and she by all accounts actually birthed him like any human woman births her son... that makes him (drum roll) an AMERICAN. Despite where it happens.. or when... on a cruise ship in the middle of uncharted waters, or in the air over Mexico... he would still be an American. Are bureaucracies, like hospitals, so air tight that mistakes don't happen? How the hell did he ever get into school with a birth certificate? You don't think he hasn't crossed this bridge many times? I had to provide a birth certificate to get a drivers license... that sucked to track down. I don't even know if I provided a legal copy. I just had something faxed over.
Constitution:
If it said "AND"... then perhaps it is a story. It sayd "OR", so ... well...
Is McCain really a legal presidential candidate? He is born, after all, on (drum roll) foreign land .
We all know the answer. It doesn't seem like too hard of a conclusion to draw.

Surely you can understand the curiosity in it all though? Biden, Palin and McCain all three have submitted physical proof of their certificates, yet as soon as this question is proposed to Obama he gives an online sample but has his original sealed? Why? When I first saw this info being brought up I thought there was nothing to it. But then there seems to still be something to it or he wouldn't have had it sealed from view? I don't understand.

Rick

untbowler · November 4, 2008

Not this again... What can he be hiding? Obama's mother was American, and she by all accounts actually birthed him like any human woman births her son... that makes him (drum roll) an AMERICAN. Despite where it happens.. or when... on a cruise ship in the middle of uncharted waters, or in the air over Mexico... he would still be an American. Are bureaucracies, like hospitals, so air tight that mistakes don't happen? How the hell did he ever get into school with a birth certificate? You don't think he hasn't crossed this bridge many times? I had to provide a birth certificate to get a drivers license... that sucked to track down. I don't even know if I provided a legal copy. I just had something faxed over.
Constitution:
If it said "AND"... then perhaps it is a story. It sayd "OR", so ... well...
Is McCain really a legal presidential candidate? He is born, after all, on (drum roll) foreign land .
We all know the answer. It doesn't seem like too hard of a conclusion to draw.

Well he dad was a British National in the US on a student Visa, so technically he could have taken on British Citizenship, also his step-father was in Indonesia, so why has he not shown his real birth certificate.

stebo · November 4, 2008

Possibly because people track down half-step-aunts and accuse Obama of not paying their bills? I don't know anyone on my father's side of the family. He had a terrible childhood and doesn't want anything to do with them. Barrack has a very large extended family and there are already reports of how he leaves those distant relatives to squandor in poverty even though he doesn't have contact with them... hmm, why would he want to keep his "pedigree" private? The same way that I would want mine private.

untbowler · November 4, 2008

Possibly because people track down half-step-aunts and accuse Obama of not paying their bills? I don't know anyone on my father's side of the family. He had a terrible childhood and doesn't want anything to do with them. Barrack has a very large extended family and there are already reports of how he leaves those distant relatives to squandor in poverty even though he doesn't have contact with them... hmm, why would he want to keep his "pedigree" private? The same way that I would want mine private.

That is fine if he wants to keep it private, then the press should have also allowed Palin/McCain to also have there privacy, but instead have ripped their lives to shreds.

I am also thankful they did not bring up the tragic death of Biden's wife and son at least, but the bias is pretty sad now days. Please just end this election and let everyone get on with their lives under a big wart called the federal government.

stebo · November 4, 2008

There was a study that came out this weekend that showed the media had about a 65%-35% bias for Obama. I think that Fox was the only one that swung for McCain. NBC swung the most for Obama. The study looked at past elections and showed that sometimes that bias is a hinderance... For instance, the 2004 election. Kerry had about the same margin of bias (favorable) as Obama going into the final week of the election; yet most voters in post election polling said that it was that bias that had caused them to vote against Kerry not for him... so it is a slippery slope either way. Most people will make up their mind based on their family and friends. It only takes one person being passionate about a candidate to change the minds of 100's of others. Elections are won on emotions, these candidates can't exactly do what they propose to do - they can only make proposals and hope that Congress sends up bills to support those proposals. The majority of people in our country are not passionate about politics in general, they just vote how their family and friends vote. Obama has been able to play off of emotions to get people extremely wrapped up in this plight and those people go and convert others. McCain also shot himself in the foot with Palin in that same study, because of the SNL effect. She became a joke - and when she played along with it, it validated it. Most people just cannot fathom Palin taking over the presidency if something were to happen to McCain and I think that has really hurt his chances.

ADLER · November 4, 2008

WOW! A very powerful post from an ex Obama campaign staffer: Please read and send to your entire computer address book! You will not believe what this lady has to say--it's pretty darn scary stuff about B. Huseein Obama, fellow Americans.

K7LrZBshaSo

November 4, 2008

Surely you can understand the curiosity in it all though? Biden, Palin and McCain all three have submitted physical proof of their certificates, yet as soon as this question is proposed to Obama he gives an online sample but has his original sealed? Why? When I first saw this info being brought up I thought there was nothing to it. But then there seems to still be something to it or he wouldn't have had it sealed from view? I don't understand.
Rick

I believe that when they say "he had it sealed," they are talking about officially stamped. So the claim is that it isn't an original, it is a fake, but stamped by his governor liberal commie friend to give it legitimacy. Not that he is keeping it out of sight...

So I don't understand the "omg, he had it sealed", the means it must be fake argument. A person has a long history with their birth certificate... getting into pre-school, elementary, middle, high... college. TXDOT, DMV. It follows you everywhere. Very easy to prove that he doesn't' have one... but even easier to make a conspiracy out of it.

FirefightnRick · November 4, 2008

I believe that when they say "he had it sealed," they are talking about officially stamped. So the claim is that it isn't an original, it is a fake, but stamped by his governor liberal commie friend to give it legitimacy. Not that he is keeping it out of sight...
So I don't understand the "omg, he had it sealed", the means it must be fake argument. A person has a long history with their birth certificate... getting into pre-school, elementary, middle, high... college. TXDOT, DMV. It follows you everywhere. Very easy to prove that he doesn't' have one... but even easier to make a conspiracy out of it.

Damn your good. Never thought of it that way. However, one problem with that is if Hawaii is like most states the State Department of Health and the State Registrar "Certifies" the birth certificates. I have never heard of a governor doing this, of course it might be different in Hawaii?

Rick

meangreendork · November 4, 2008

Damn your good. Never thought of it that way. However, one problem with that is if Hawaii is like most states the State Department of Health and the State Registrar "Certifies" the birth certificates. I have never heard of a governor doing this, of course it might be different in Hawaii?
Rick

It's Hawaii, it's very different. Come on, their pinnacle of law enforcement is a man with a 10foot mullet who doesn't have eyes, and wears sunglasses to everything, including his wedding.

Edited November 4, 2008 by meangreendork

UNTLifer · November 4, 2008

It's Hawaii, it's very different. Come on, their pinnacle of law enforcement is a man with a 10foot mullet who doesn't have eyes, and wears sunglasses to everything, including his wedding.

FALSE!!!

Dano is their pinnacle of law enforcement!!!

TheTastyGreek · November 4, 2008

FALSE!!!
Dano is their pinnacle of law enforcement!!!

BOTH WRONG.

Get your damn facts straight if you're going to vote, people.

McGarrett is the pinnacle of their law enforcement. Dan-o was his enforcer.

Class dismissed.

Green P1 · November 4, 2008

BOTH WRONG.
Get your damn facts straight if you're going to vote, people.
McGarrett is the pinnacle of their law enforcement. Dan-o was his enforcer.
Class dismissed.

Don't be fooled by the badges. The glue that holds those silly little islands together is a Private Investigator.