You are posting as a guest.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
We can adjust arena size, or at least its perceived size, to make the same attendance feel more big time/intense.
But how can we be sure that this will flip a switch with the local casuals? I feel like anytime we make some optimistic assumption about Denton support, we end up eating crow.
I'm speaking purely on quality of program and program interest, which will lead to media $. The current AAC deal likely looks very different post 2031, assuming the top of the conference is elsewhere. Gonzaga, Or St, Wasu, SDSU, Fresno draw serious eyeballs in their markets and nationally. I like being with Memphis and Tulane, but I'm really concerned about blow-up risk and don't want to be back with La Tech/UL. If we lose the top of AAC to PAC/ACC I would much rather be with MWC than AAC leftovers + CUSA/Sbelt backfills (if AAC can even lure them).
At this point in time, what is really stopping schools like Ohio St., Bama, SMU and so on from just putting their players under contract? because i know it's definitely not the NCAA... what is their risk as employers?
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.