Jump to content

Sun Belt Included In Gmac Bowl Talks

MeanGreen61

By MeanGreen61
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

MeanGreen61 Newbie

MeanGreen61

Posted
Posted

GMAC Bowl in discussions with other leagues, and a new look to Ladd-Peebles could only help

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

By GARETH CLARY

Sports Reporter

The GMAC Bowl is exploring a new combination of conference tie-ins, and proposed enhancements to Ladd-Peebles Stadium that could help attract a relationship with a high-profile league.

The bowl's contracts with Conference USA and the Mid-America Conference expire after the 2009 contest, which is set for Jan. 6.

GMAC Bowl officials have been in talks about new tie-ins beginning in 2010 with several conferences, including the Southeastern Conference, Atlantic Coast Conference, Big East, Western Athletic Conference and the Sun Belt.

"Where we stand is we're talking to a lot of people and we'll probably make some changes," said GMAC Bowl President Jerry Silverstein. "It looks like that. It's positive that the city is going to do some things to the stadium that's going to really help a lot and bring some interest to it with everything that's going on in Mobile with the economy and businesswise.

"We hope to have some announcements to make probably in the next 60 days of what our future is. We're still working on it. We're not dotting 'I's' and crossing 'T's' yet, but we're real close."

Silverstein declined to reveal which conferences were providing the most serious interest in hooking up with the GMAC Bowl.

He noted the WAC has Louisiana Tech in the Central Standard Time zone and that Troy of the Sun Belt was 8-4 last year, but didn't receive a bowl bid.

Silverstein also pointed out that the SEC's new tie-in with the Papajohns.com Bowl at Legion Field in Birmingham, announced last week, is only a two-year deal. That new contract represents the SEC's ninth bowl tie-in.

"That leaves the door open for some things in the future," Silverstein said. "That would be the ultimate if you could get in the rotation where you're guaranteed a team."

Silverstein acknowledged there would be obstacles to overcome for that scenario to unfold.

"We're a mid-major bowl and we want to do the best we can," he said. "We have limited resources with the size of our stadium and what we have to deal with. We have only 40,000 seats instead of the 72,000 they have in Birmingham. We would have to raise our ticket prices probably double from what they are to be comparable, which is not the Mobile market.

"That's not to say that between spon sorship and TV contracts in situations that could come about that it's impossible to do."

The GMAC Bowl nearly pulled an SEC team through a loophole in its contract with the MAC last year. That clause allowed the game to choose an SEC team that went 7-5 and was not selected to fill one of the league's tie-ins.

Steve Spurrier's South Carolina squad was 6-6 and not invited to a bowl game. An appeal to the NCAA to waive the 7-5 requirement was rejected, so the GMAC Bowl was unable to invite the Gamecocks to town with their legendary coach and legions of traveling fans.

Silverstein said the size of Ladd-Peebles Stadium hasn't been a major issue in discussions with some of the major conferences.

"There's not really a size limit," said Silverstein, adding that it would be a nice carrot if the stadium had another 10,000 seats. "They want tickets and they want their payouts. A lot of bowls are going more regionally instead of sending teams from the Northeast to California or something.

"We're in a great spot here in Mobile. It's just making it all work out and making the numbers work."

Silverstein said the game has a little bit of an edge because its contracts come up a year earlier than many comparable bowls with four-year arrangements.

"It allows us to know what the landscape is and we've been working for a couple of years," he said. "We couldn't really make any of those moves being under contract and where things are. We're out of sequence and that started several years ago with some renewals and things like that. It probably can be an advantage for us in a lot of things."

Guest GrayEagleOne

Guest GrayEagleOne

Posted
Posted

It's good that the bowls are looking at the Belt, but I think if they would prefer a 6-6 SEC team to an 8-4 Belt team.

True, but what if they could've had both....South Carolina vs. Troy. Troy, being less than 100 miles away, and South Carolina, with the Spurrier aura would've packed the place.

One other small advantage is that South Alabama is supposed to become a FBS team within five years.

UNTflyer Apprentice

UNTflyer

Posted
Posted

True, but what if they could've had both....South Carolina vs. Troy. Troy, being less than 100 miles away, and South Carolina, with the Spurrier aura would've packed the place.

One other small advantage is that South Alabama is supposed to become a FBS team within five years.

Indeed. SC vs Troy would have been a great bowl game.

Eagle1855 Newbie

Eagle1855

Posted
Posted

One thing that have to do with the GMAC bowl is move it earlier. Who wants to watch the MAC vs C-USA after most of the BCS games have played?

Well, I'll watch just about any football if it's the only thing that is on. I've watched a lot of MAC games the past couple years because of all their zany (yeah I said ZANY) schedules. Tuesday night football? Yes, please.

LongJim Experienced

LongJim

Posted
Posted

Well, I'll watch just about any football if it's the only thing that is on. I've watched a lot of MAC games the past couple years because of all their zany (yeah I said ZANY) schedules. Tuesday night football? Yes, please.

No kidding. I'm down with it as well. The GMAC would be a perfect second bowl for the SBC, and a perfect location as well. There are much worse destinations during bowl season than New Orleans and Mobile. I would love to see an ACC/Big East opponent against an SBC school in a bowl down there.

UNTFan23 Community Regular

UNTFan23

Posted
Posted

Only those who long for the NMST rivalry and long road trips to Boise, ID.

Or flying across 1/3 of the Pacific. Despite what maps show, Hawaii isn't as close to California as they indicate.

UNTflyer Apprentice

UNTflyer

Posted
Posted

Or flying across 1/3 of the Pacific. Despite what maps show, Hawaii isn't as close to California as they indicate.

I think the WAC is a horrible choice. It should be either C-USA or the MWC. And, of course, any of the Big 6 that may come knocking.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 393

      ***OFFICIAL UNT vs. UTSA IN-GAME DISCUSSION***

      Atrocious in "all 3 phases" (that onside kick was a film study discovery by UTSA) but E Morris is just a horrible game manager. Just stupid decisions on multiple levels. I wish we weren't in the bowl hunt so Caponi could be fired if at least as a symbolic action to show the rest of the staff (minus Cobbs) they need to step it up a bunch. To the decision making, it's all been said. The timeout at 2nd and 16 with 49 seconds to go when most offenses would just let the clock run out to close the half, not taking reasonable field goal attempts early on, poor playcalling (honestly surprised a screen didn't get intercepted), these things fall on Eric Morris. Just garbage level game management. It's like he's playing a video game where there's no real consequences. Time of possession was about 39 to 21 in UTSA's favor. I know Porter had huge runs but UTSA also had huge plays. Why is it that others are capable of sustaining drives and eating clock but our "elite" offense can't do so? Defenses aside, you'd think our supposed top notch offense could be more consistent. I know our defense needs to make stops more consistently but anybody please tell me why our offense isn't capable of having some 6 or 7 minute scoring drives? Morris needs to relax on the pace of game. Just idiotic at this point.
      GMG_Dallas in Mean Green Football
    2. 19

      This is a big game for Elf

      Fine. We will call him Coach Shitty. Better?
      97and03 in Mean Green Football
    3. 393

      ***OFFICIAL UNT vs. UTSA IN-GAME DISCUSSION***

      Bold added for accuracy.
      97and03 in Mean Green Football
    4. 7

      Why Support this Program?….Seriously!?

      Hilarious. Dudes have been in here since the 70s waiting for a miracle. I refuse to waste that much time.
      Salsa_Verde in Mean Green Football
    5. 393

      ***OFFICIAL UNT vs. UTSA IN-GAME DISCUSSION***

      Didn’t even watch. I already knew. But hey….morale victory or whatever.
      Salsa_Verde in Mean Green Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,478
    • Most Online
      1,865
    meangreen0015
    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.