Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Was the coach that touched the ball that cost Texas a turnover the former Arky State qb?

They just said it was MACK BROWN's step son.

Posted

Poor guy, he's hurting. Mac Brown needs to get his kids, grandkids, aunts, uncles, buddies, or whoever off the field. If he's trying to teach this kid something, put him upstairs in a booth. There's just way too many folks right up against the field.

Posted

Whoever it was, UT got the royal bad job on that call.....there were so many things wrong with that call. I am not a UT fan, but my gosh that was bad. Almost as bad as the calls in the fourth quarter of the Pitt/WVA game.

Those are SEC Officials.

Posted

UT actually got a break, although moot. The enforcement was correct, but it should have been 3rd down, not 4th. (moot because ASU scored on the next play).

I sure didn't see conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the field. Besides that, you can tell from the video and the way the ball bounced that it stayed in bounds long enough for UT to recover the backwards pass.

Posted

Those are SEC Officials.

they did a pretty lousy job through most of the game, both ways. I can't stand when officials get in the way of the game, throw teams out of rhythm.

Had those been Sun Belt refs, all we'd be hearing about today is how "bush league" they were, and how they weren't ready to officiate "big time" football.

Posted

UT actually got a break, although moot. The enforcement was correct, but it should have been 3rd down, not 4th. (moot because ASU scored on the next play).

The refs said the infraction occured ater the play was over, therefore it was 4th down.

Posted

The refs said the infraction occured ater the play was over, therefore it was 4th down.

if it was after the play was over, why wouldn't it then be Texas' ball and the penalty be taken out of that? Only thing I can figure is that as soon as it was allegedly touched, the play is dead. If so, the 4th down makes sense. Still, I saw no indisputable evidence that it was ever touched.

Of course, it didn't really matter as the Pac10 co-champs were way overmatched with Texas' size and speed.

Posted

if it was after the play was over, why wouldn't it then be Texas' ball and the penalty be taken out of that? Only thing I can figure is that as soon as it was allegedly touched, the play is dead. If so, the 4th down makes sense. Still, I saw no indisputable evidence that it was ever touched.

Of course, it didn't really matter as the Pac10 co-champs were way overmatched with Texas' size and speed.

Say what you will about Texas - I certainly do - but they are the only team in the Big 12 to beat a ranked opponent (at game time) from the conference in the last two years. Of course, it helps when they are an overrated preseason team (TCU) and part of this year's PAC-10 sewer water, but still....

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.