Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good question. Any recent stadiums build for this kinda cash...anyone? Hope it is done right.

Good question. I think Texas Tech spent about $61M just to renovate thier stadium and I don't think they added any seats. More nice skyboxes but no increased set count. Now, can we start from ground up on a new facility and spend less money than a renovation and get what we want? Not sure, but I am excited about a new stadium! I think the recruits know about it too. If TD doesn't use that carrot I would be surprised. Something is working!

Posted

Not much at all. Pizza Hut Park is built for soccer/concerts with a 20,500 capacity. It cost about $100 mil. Of course they do have the numerous playing fields that do surround it, but they aren't anything fancy.

Posted

UCF's new stadium was built for an amount in that ballpark.

UCFnewstadium.jpg

That would be perfect...and would fit in nicely with the rest of the facilities over at the Mean Green Village. It sounds like for $60 million, they got the stadium, roads, other infrastructure, AND severla athletic fields. We would not need the athletic fields, and infrastructure should not be too bad.

Posted

Good question. Any recent stadiums build for this kinda cash...anyone? Hope it is done right.

Akron is starting construction in January (next month) to be ready for home opener in 2009 on a $61.6M stadium...(original constructions estimates were $55M just 5 months ago) for a 30,000 capacity stadium.

StadiumAerial.jpg

Posted (edited)

One of the construction costs for this project that I'm curious about is the earthwork and grading. If you've even been over to the proposed site, there's a pretty significant slope/elevation change. You always hope for nice piece of flat land to build on, but nothing is ever completely flat. But this site will require a very large amount of earth to be cut away and/or several retaining walls. Sometimes the stadium itself can become part of the retaining wall. Short of the long, the additional earth work alone will eat up some dollars that some other stadiums might get to use for aesthetics.

Edited by trud1966
Posted

Not much at all. Pizza Hut Park is built for soccer/concerts with a 20,500 capacity. It cost about $100 mil. Of course they do have the numerous playing fields that do surround it, but they aren't anything fancy.

I beg to differ with your "they aren't anything fancy" statement. Those fields are top flight. You may just look and see a dozen or so soccer fields but they are way more than that. About half of them are sand fields that can handle and drain over 12 inches of rain an hour. All of the fields, sand and non-sand, are tiff bermuda (can you say golf green?) plus there is one artificial turf field. And they are all lighted. They also all have drainage "ponds" that capture the rain the fields can't absorb and then are used to water the fields at a later date. It's not as though someone just scrapped the dirt and threw out some seed. Now are they $40 Million worth of fields? Probably not. Could they have cost $10 Million. I wouldn't be surprised. If you ever get a chance to play on those fields or even just walk barefoot acroos them do it. They really are amazing.

(I also think they had to do massive infastructure improvements seeing how nothing was there prior to the park. Roads, drainage, sewer, water etc. With our stadium we will at least have sewer and water nearby to tie in to.)

Posted (edited)

I still like East Carolina's stadium the best. Doubt we can get a concrete stadium for $55-60 million. About all we can hope for is something like UCF's erector set stadium. Still better than Fouts.

ECU Stadium

Edited by DeepGreen
Posted

If you ever get a chance to play on those fields or even just walk barefoot acroos them do it. They really are amazing.

I have played on them and they are absolutely top of the line. There is a reason the Dallas Cup is played there.

Posted

I beg to differ with your "they aren't anything fancy" statement. Those fields are top flight. You may just look and see a dozen or so soccer fields but they are way more than that. About half of them are sand fields that can handle and drain over 12 inches of rain an hour. All of the fields, sand and non-sand, are tiff bermuda (can you say golf green?) plus there is one artificial turf field. And they are all lighted. They also all have drainage "ponds" that capture the rain the fields can't absorb and then are used to water the fields at a later date. It's not as though someone just scrapped the dirt and threw out some seed. Now are they $40 Million worth of fields? Probably not. Could they have cost $10 Million. I wouldn't be surprised. If you ever get a chance to play on those fields or even just walk barefoot acroos them do it. They really are amazing.

(I also think they had to do massive infastructure improvements seeing how nothing was there prior to the park. Roads, drainage, sewer, water etc. With our stadium we will at least have sewer and water nearby to tie in to.)

They are top notch, no doubt. I've played on them as well. But like you said, $10 mil is a lot closer estimate than $40 mil. You take those fields out and just leave the parking lots and its still a $90 mil 20,500 capacity stadium.

Posted

I beg to differ with your "they aren't anything fancy" statement. Those fields are top flight. You may just look and see a dozen or so soccer fields but they are way more than that. About half of them are sand fields that can handle and drain over 12 inches of rain an hour. All of the fields, sand and non-sand, are tiff bermuda (can you say golf green?) plus there is one artificial turf field. And they are all lighted. They also all have drainage "ponds" that capture the rain the fields can't absorb and then are used to water the fields at a later date. It's not as though someone just scrapped the dirt and threw out some seed. Now are they $40 Million worth of fields? Probably not. Could they have cost $10 Million. I wouldn't be surprised. If you ever get a chance to play on those fields or even just walk barefoot acroos them do it. They really are amazing.

(I also think they had to do massive infastructure improvements seeing how nothing was there prior to the park. Roads, drainage, sewer, water etc. With our stadium we will at least have sewer and water nearby to tie in to.)

I also believe that cost figure includes the price of the land itself. The land that facility sits on is premium land, that would be great for retail and other uses, I imagine the price per foot was not cheap.

Posted

Akron is starting construction in January (next month) to be ready for home opener in 2009 on a $61.6M stadium...(original constructions estimates were $55M just 5 months ago) for a 30,000 capacity stadium.

StadiumAerial.jpg

I agree with spaceradier, if you could get a stadium like Akron's for 55-60 million with maybe 35,000 seats....unbeatable.

http://www.uakron.edu/stadium/images/Stadi...hWestCorner.jpg

http://www.uakron.edu/stadium/images/Stadi...bLevelLobby.jpg

http://www.uakron.edu/stadium/images/StadiumPressTower.jpg

Posted

The Akron stadium looks a lot nicer than the UCF one, so what's the deal, land cost construction cost or something else we don't know about? I would guess everything in Florida is more expensive. I would definitely take the Akron stadium even if only 30K seats. Fill it up and then you will have more money to expand. I like the idea of tickets being a little harder to come by instread of a 60% filled stadium.

Posted (edited)

The Akron stadium looks a lot nicer than the UCF one, so what's the deal, land cost construction cost or something else we don't know about? I would guess everything in Florida is more expensive. I would definitely take the Akron stadium even if only 30K seats. Fill it up and then you will have more money to expand. I like the idea of tickets being a little harder to come by instread of a 60% filled stadium.

Agreed! I don't care much at all for the UCF stadium. Looks old style and not very inviting at first glance. Akron looks easily expandable and much more modern. But then again, what are we looking for? A bump in the ticket price would likely be OK the first year to give TD and Co. a chance to turn the program in to a winner.

Edited by GreenExes
Posted

I also believe that cost figure includes the price of the land itself. The land that facility sits on is premium land, that would be great for retail and other uses, I imagine the price per foot was not cheap.

Excellent point.

Posted

I agree with spaceradier, if you could get a stadium like Akron's for 55-60 million with maybe 35,000 seats....unbeatable.

http://www.uakron.edu/stadium/images/Stadi...hWestCorner.jpg

http://www.uakron.edu/stadium/images/Stadi...bLevelLobby.jpg

http://www.uakron.edu/stadium/images/StadiumPressTower.jpg

I really like how they are intergrating either classrooms or dorms into the site. Smart.

Posted

I also believe that cost figure includes the price of the land itself. The land that facility sits on is premium land, that would be great for retail and other uses, I imagine the price per foot was not cheap.

That's why they play in Frisco, because they got such a sweet deal on the land. Not to mention a little help from Frisco ISD.

Is there any reason why we couldn't do the same with Denton ISD? What stadium do the two high schools currently play in? Couldn't we get DISD to chip in $15 mil and allow them to use our field on Thursdays and Fridays?

Posted

That's why they play in Frisco, because they got such a sweet deal on the land. Not to mention a little help from Frisco ISD.

Is there any reason why we couldn't do the same with Denton ISD? What stadium do the two high schools currently play in? Couldn't we get DISD to chip in $15 mil and allow them to use our field on Thursdays and Fridays?

We tried to go down this road about 5 or 6 years ago. Instead Denton ISD built themselves a top of the line stadium out on loop 288 and said "no thanks" to NT.

Posted (edited)

The Akron stadium looks a lot nicer than the UCF one, so what's the deal, land cost construction cost or something else we don't know about? I would guess everything in Florida is more expensive. I would definitely take the Akron stadium even if only 30K seats. Fill it up and then you will have more money to expand. I like the idea of tickets being a little harder to come by instread of a 60% filled stadium.

Agree. UCF's is too symmetrical and boring. Akron's looks more customized.

Edited by NT80

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 7

      Ladies at ACU

    2. 8

      Next week's ECU game is our last chance this season to sellout DATCU Stadium

    3. 8

      Team transportation to San Antonio

    4. 67

      Caponi fired

    5. 50

      2025 DC Wish List

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      126
    3. 3
    4. 4
      keith
      keith
      100
    5. 5
      SUMG
      SUMG
      97
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,478
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.