Jump to content

Please Provide Some In-game Updates

SouthBendGreen

By SouthBendGreen
in Mean Green Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

JayDub Newbie

JayDub

Posted
Posted

Amen brother. We have just stepped on the first stone, while attempting to cross the river.

It is going to take some time. In the meantime, enjoy the ride. This was one heck of an exciting game. Isn't that what we have all wanted ? Exciting Football ?

Yes, it was exciting...and we will succeed with it eventually.

But, why are we wasting time with a guy that likely won't be our QB next year? And what happened to our defense?

  • Replies 267
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Green Mean Enthusiast

Green Mean

Posted
Posted

........So uhh Vizza next week.

I dont think so...I want to see Vizza play just as much as the next person but after just 2 games we have seen what an improvement Meager has made in comparison what he's done the last two seasons....sure he did make you crazy at the moment of INT's but thats just the spur of the moment fandom. Go with Meager next week.

El Paso Eagle Grand Master

El Paso Eagle

Posted
Posted

Meager played an amazing game minus two or three throws.

Upset that we lost to SMU, and upset with our defense, but other than that, it was all good.

Sort of like our own A-Rod. Great stats but when it really counts he did not produce. Facts are Facts.

UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted

HOW DID WE JUST SCREW THAT UP???

I'm sure it was Meager's fault.

You guys are ridiculous. Meager throws the ball 60 times, has 600 yards and 3 TD's. If we had any kind of defense he wouldn't have been in the position of needing to throw it late that created the interceptions. Give the young man a break.

untbowler Grand Master

untbowler

Posted
Posted

what we saw was Meager rake in the yards but anytime there was the least bit of pressure he folded like a card house. Look at the last 2 INTs and the sacks in the last few drives. Won't even comment on the snap screw-up while down at the 1 yd line. Bring on Vizza, Meager has already had plenty of time.

UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted

Sort of like our own A-Rod. Great stats but when it really counts they did not produce. Facts are Facts.

There, fixed it. Yep, the defense did not produce.

UNTLifer Grand Master

UNTLifer

Posted
Posted

what we saw was Meager rake in the yards but anytime there was the least bit of pressure he folded like a card house. Look at the last 2 INTs and the sacks in the last few drives. Won't even comment on the snap screw-up while down at the 1 yd line. Bring on Vizza, Meager has already had plenty of time.

What an assinine post.

risinggreen Newbie

risinggreen

Posted
Posted

I'm sure it was Meager's fault.

You guys are ridiculous. Meager throws the ball 60 times, has 600 yards and 3 TD's. If we had any kind of defense he wouldn't have been in the position of needing to throw it late that created the interceptions. Give the young man a break.

I'm not going to dump on Meager too much, but I think you hit on something when you said 600 yards and ONLY 3 TD's. I certainly like the yards, but not crazy about the TD's since we don't seem to be doing a whole hell of a lot on the ground.

CaribbeanGreen Mentor

CaribbeanGreen

Posted
Posted

This SMU offense did not score a TD against Texas Tech's suspect defense. Tonight, Tech gave up 31 to UTEP.

My only concern with this crazy offense is this -- yes, it's exciting, but are we going to be Texas Tech/Hawaii/Wherever Hal Mumme is where the defense is forced onto the field forever, every game is a track meet, etc? This defense was supposed to be the CLEAR strength of the team. SMU has comparable talent to NT and an offense that scored SIX on us last year and didn't get in the end zone once against TTU.

Tonight, talent wasn't the difference. We beat these guys 24-6 last year. We'll be seduced by the sexy numbers, but this hurts.

Eagle-96 Explorer

Eagle-96

Posted
Posted (edited)

Tap the brakes guys. Meager just threw for 597 yards in ONE game. Fitzgerald had 326 yards receiving and Bjax had over 100. Sure Meager had three picks but if you think the offense cost us this game then you are wrong. This is our SECOND GAME in this new offense and we just broke the single game passing and receiving records. It is gonna take time for the team to get where we want to be but we just put up 634 yards of total offense. This offense is only going to get better. And remember when high school seniors that play on the offensive side of the ball see these kind of stats they will start salivating over playing in this kind of offense. We may have lost on the scoreboard, but we may be winning some recruiting battles with this kind of output.

And please explain to me how this defense was going to be the clear strength of this team. We may have brought back a majority of the starting defense from last year but that goes out the window because last years defense stunk. This defense hasn't been good since Gary DeLoach left.

Edited by Eagle-96
BeanCounterGrad'03 Rookie

BeanCounterGrad'03

Posted
Posted (edited)

Tap the brakes guys. Meager just threw for 597 yards in ONE game. Fitzgerald had 326 yards receiving and Bjax had over 100. Sure Meager had three picks but if you think the offense cost us this game then you are wrong. This is our SECOND GAME in this new offense and we just broke the single game passing and receiving records. It is gonna take time for the team to get where we want to be but we just put up 634 yards of total offense. This offense is only going to get better. And remember when high school seniors that play on the offensive side of the ball see these kind of stats they will start salivating over playing in this kind of offense. We may have lost on the scoreboard, but we may be winning some recruiting battles with this kind of output.

I just heard Dunham state that Meager threw for more yards tonight than he did all last season...I'm definitely still excited about the rest of the season and beyond.

Edited by BeanCounterGrad'03
BeanCounterGrad'03 Rookie

BeanCounterGrad'03

Posted
Posted

So we only had 37 yards rushing? Not looking to go back to DD ball by any means, but it sounds like we didn't mix it up real well. No doubt that I'm very optimistic about the future regardless of the numbers.

Also consider the sacks and that 25!!! yard loss for the bad snap.

MeanGreen61 Newbie

MeanGreen61

Posted
Posted

Parts of this thread proves the old saying that some people will complain about anything. With DD it was always throw the ball. Now with TD it's why can't we run. People piss me off at times.

Yep, there are some "Polly Perfects" on the board.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!

  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 7

      Next week's ECU game is our last chance this season to sellout DATCU Stadium

      Fire Eric Morris day
      Big Z in Mean Green Football
    2. 46

      2025 DC Wish List

      We will need to connect some dots for a potential new DC hire (assuming the interim doesn't get it). First, Caponi had no apparent Texas connections. He was a career defensive asst position coach at several schools, and lastly a CB coach at Iowa State, before being elevated to DC at UNT. He did have some DC time at a Dlll school in 2008-10, but nothing since. Was he elevated too fast? https://meangreensports.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/matt-caponi/731 Does Morris have a short-list already? Probably. It's not like everyone didn't know there needed to be a change in DC for some time coming. Here are some starting criteria: -The new DC "should" have previous FCS or FBS DC experience...so a repeat learning-curve doesn't happen. -Texas ties for recruiting would be bonus points. -For a quick hire, I expect it to be someone Morris is already familiar with, no interview needed, only $ negotiated. -Are 2-year contracts a thing for Coordinators in FBS? If not, One-year only please, until we establish confidence. So, with all that in mind: -Find some FCS DCs that Morris worked with somewhere else. -A DC on an FBS staff where the HC has already been fired, or soon will be, but they had a good Defense! (a new HC will bring his own staff in). -A former head coach that has been recently recycled back thru DC to try again.
      NT80 in Mean Green Football
    3. 50

      Why Support this Program?….Seriously!?

      In their defense, they probably got influenced by free tickets, the DFW media swooning over them, and want to see why being a real winner feels like.
      untjim1995 in Mean Green Football
    4. 50

      Why Support this Program?….Seriously!?

      We even have UNT alumni cheering or going to SMU games says enough
      • 1
      • Puking Eagle
      Big Z in Mean Green Football
    5. 16

      Why is the big white kid not playing?

      Stone should of left for D2 or D3 a long time ago
      Big Z in Mean Green Basketball

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      154
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      120
    3. 3
      GMG_Dallas
    4. 4
      keith
      keith
      98
    5. 5
      SUMG
      SUMG
      96
    Show More

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,478
    • Most Online
      1,865
    meangreen0015
    Newest Member
    meangreen0015
    Joined

WE BELIEVE IN THE MEAN GREEN!

News

Recruiting

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.