Jump to content

Recommended Posts

They are definitely a football powerhouse....sure they have been known to have that thug image but these days you will see that almost everywhere. They are a small school but yet are really supportive of the program. If you are going to count the last couple of decade then yes I would call them a dynasty over everybody else I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dynasty implies a series or succession of titles. You could possibly make a case that they were a dynasty in the 80's, but with 4 titles in 9 years (none in succession) that equates to one every other year at best...not a great case IMO. They didn't give the ancient Chinese rulers the title of dynasties because they ruled every other year. There are cases of back-to-back titles in every sport. I think to be considered a dynasty, you have to win at least 3 titles in a 4 year span. Just my opinion. Below, you'll obviously see others would disagree with me.

The last two titles are 1991 and 2001...so every 10 years?. With 5 total titles they are a football powerhouse, and a household name. These teams had a dynasty:

Boston Celtics - 7 consecutive titles

Chicago Bulls - 3 in a row, twice; or 6 out of 8 years

UNC Women's Soccer: 18 of the 25 NCAA championships, including 17 of the first 20

Maybe the ND Fighting Irish of the '40s?

...and the Yanks have won 3 consecutive titles, and 4 consecutive titles. Not really an MLB fan, so they can have their 26 titles and call it whatever they want.

...interesting off-season thread. Thank God.

PS: Notre Dame has 8 titles (11 consensus)...are you forgetting that? From Wiki:

Division I-A

Note: The NCAA does not officially recognize a champion for Division I-A college football. This list is compiled using CFBDW's list of recognized national champions [1].

* Princeton (24 championships between 1869 and 1935)

* Yale (19 championships between 1874 and 1909)

* Pittsburgh (5 Championships between 1904 and 1939 including a 32 game win streak 1914-1919 and a 22 game win streak 1936-1938 over the 35 year period Pitt only had 2 losing seasons and both were within a game of .500 or better, for the time period the Panthers went a combined 250 wins, 57 losses and 18 ties).

* Harvard (3 championships from 1898 to 1901, 5 championships between 1908 and 1919)

* Minnesota (5 championships between 1934 and 1941)

* Notre Dame (5 championships between 1943 and 1953)

* Army (2 championships: 1944 and 1945)

* University of Oklahoma, 1948-1958 (national championships in 1950, 1955, and 1956; 47-game winning streak between 1953 and 1957; 107-8-2 record during span)

* Alabama (6 championships between 1961 and 1979)

* Nebraska, 1969-2001 (national championships in 1970, 1971, 1994, 1995, and 1997; additional title game appearances in 1983, 1993, and 2001; won the "Game of the Century (college football)" 35-31 over Oklahoma, in 1971; won at least nine games each season from 1969 to 2001; 24-0-1 record from 1970 to 1971; 60-3 record from 1993 to 1997; 330-60-4 record from 1969 to 2001)

* University of Oklahoma, 1971-1980 (national championships in 1974 and 1975; worst season in span: 9-2-1 (1976); 105-11-2 record during span)

* Southern California (3 championships from 1928 to 1932, 3 championships between 1972 and 1978, back-to-back chamionships in 2003 and 2004)

* Miami (FL), 1983-1994 (national championships in 1983, 1987, 1989, 1991 and 2001)

* Florida, 1990-2001 (national championship in 1996; (Southeastern Conference championships in 1991, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 2000); It is one of only three schools to ever win 10 games for six straight seasons and one of only four to ever win at least nine games for 11 straight years.)

* Florida State, 1987-2000 (national championships in 1993 and 1999; title game appearances in 1996, 1998, and 2000; AP Top 5 Finish every year (NCAA record) during span; 152-18-1 record during span)

* Boise State University, won 8 of 9 conference championships from 1999 to 2006, undefeated in conference play from 2002 through 2004, perfect 13-0 season in 2006

Edited by greenminer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.