Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We could have beat this version of USM with any of our last 3 teams. 

We probably would have given up 30 poins by the half and then make no changes so it would have been a repeat of last year and 2001.

None of our teams would have beaten USM or ASU. sad.gif

And that is the sad, sad truth.

Posted

We probably would have given up 30 poins by the half and then  make no changes so it would have been a repeat of last year and 2001.

None of our teams would have beaten USM or ASU.  sad.gif

And that is the sad, sad truth.

You guys are crazy. Our 2003 team with andrew and booger would have killed the 2005 usm team. You guys are so jaded.

Posted

You guys are crazy.  Our 2003 team with andrew and booger would have killed the 2005 usm team.  You guys are so jaded.

In 2003 we lost to Memphis with Scott at QB, are you thinking of 2002??

In 2002 we nearly lost the game when Smith threw a pick that got taken back for a TD, only to be overturned due to a block in the back 15 yards behind the play, sounds familar, so we barely won that game.

We never make adjustments and that is how ASU hung so close, but we would not have beaten USM this year or last year they are to fast and big.

Posted

We never make adjustments and that is how ASU hung so close, but we would not have beaten USM this year or last year they are to fast and big.

ASU isnt any faster than us. This USM team wasnt as good as last years. I think our previous teams would have played as good or better than this ASU team. ASU barely beat our worst team in 5 years, come on guys

Posted

I gotta give ASU major props for their performance in the NO Bowl. Had they not lost A. Warren so early in the game this might have been a Sun Belt win (he did manage to come back, but fumbled shortly there after and that turnover ended up helping USM to the final score). I really think SMiss wins CUSA this year had Katrina not decimated their town right before the start of the season.

They (SMiss) looked JUST AS BIG this year as they did last year.

So, I see TWO possible explanations for last nights close game for ASU against a supposed far more talented team.

1. Coaching. ASU appeared to have a good gameplan to attack USM. Last year (and pretty much every year) we did not.

2. USM wasn't as good as everyone thought. Hard to say on this...they only ended up 7-5, but you have to think that the hurricane really weighed heavily on this team. That said, they made a lot of early mistakes in this particular game.

Either way, I have to wonder if the perceived talent gap between the Sun Belt and all other mid-major conferences is really that large. I think that our (North Texas) performances in this game for the last 4 years really helped spread that notion further than it probably deserved. ASU had some players on the field that looked every bit as good as those on USM....I couldn't really say that last year when we played them. I think alot of that goes back on the coaching staff for the awful schemes we seem to use against every OOC opponent that we play....or is it that our players really aren't as talented as everyone else's and our schemes help us compete against (and beat) Sun Belt competition--but can't compensate against anyone outside the conference???...or do we just flat out suck at gameplanning OOC games?? I tend to believe that our coaching makes our talent look worse than it is...thoughts?

Ok...sorry for the scatterbrained comments, but this game is exactly what I had hoped for from the Sun Belt (well, I would rather have had a win). ASU didn't look like they shouldn't be on the field with USM--the way we did last year. I remember sitting in the Superdome last year (watching us get owned) thinking, "Man, it is time for someone else to win conference b/c we are not doing the conference justice in these games"....which is an awful thought to have--but can anyone seriously argue that?

Posted

We probably would have given up 30 poins by the half and then  make no changes so it would have been a repeat of last year and 2001.

None of our teams would have beaten USM or ASU.  sad.gif

And that is the sad, sad truth.

Don't let one season ruin your opinion of NT's last few years. This USM team was not near as good as last years. They lacked playmakers on defense, and Almond has not had a good season.

Posted

USM played bad, really, really, bad. You could see a point in the 3rd quarter with about 8 min. to go where they finally started to put it together. ASU should have been down 14-0 after the 1st.

I was impressed with Noce as he kept ASU in the game with his scrambling ability.

Posted

I just got tired of the announcers not giving ASU any credit. I know USM was heavily favored, but they acted like it would be the upset of the century if ASU won.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love GoMeanGreen.com? Tell a friend!
  • What's going on Mean Green?

    1. 23

      Mensah Getting $8 Million NIL Deal

    2. 1

      Where are they now? Jason Edwards

    3. 94

      Portal players leaving

    4. 47

      Chris Jimmerson

    5. 47

      Stop Blaming Athletes and the NCAA for Ruining College Football

  • Popular Contributors

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      15,505
    • Most Online
      1,865

    Newest Member
    Jepper
    Joined
  • Most Points

    1. 1
    2. 2
      NT80
      NT80
      137,403
    3. 3
      KingDL1
      KingDL1
      131,325
    4. 4
      greenminer
      greenminer
      123,950
    5. 5
      TheReal_jayD
      TheReal_jayD
      109,004
  • Biggest Gamblers

    1. 1
      EdtheEagle
      EdtheEagle
      26,591,267
    2. 2
      UNTLifer
      UNTLifer
      4,480,984
    3. 3
      untphd
      untphd
      841,161
    4. 4
      flyonthewall
      flyonthewall
      670,422
    5. 5
      3_n_out
      3_n_out
      578,480
    6. 6
    7. 7
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      UNT_FH_FR_YR
      454,039
    8. 8
    9. 9
    10. 10
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.