Is C-USA = or better than Sunbelt?

[ScreamingEaglesFan]

Okay i'll admit sometimes i'm a little slow but I just saw that USF was a member of C-USA. I'm curious (no offense USF fans) but how did a program that's only been around for 6 years into that conference, and overall is the overall conference equal or better than the Sunblet top to bottom?

[TexasFootball37]

As of now USF is an independent team. Last I heard was they will not officially be in C-USA football until next season. I think C-USA is a better conference than the SBC because the SBC teams have not had time to build and develop a 1-A quality football team. But who knows, we will find out December 17th in New Orleans and hopefully UNT will represent the SBC well.

[redallover]

As 37 mentioned, USF's in next year. USF has done a remarkable job.

Top to bottom?

Top -- Louisville (beat FSU) and USM

Bottom -- UAB and Army

I suppose just look at the Sagarin rankings in a few weeks when they start to count more.

[CMJ]

Top to bottom, I'd say C-USA is the stronger conference.

[Heckler]

Top to bottom, I'd say C-USA is the stronger conference.

agreed. Its much. I'd rather go 3-3 in conference play in CUSA than dominate the Sun Belt.