Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know this has been mentioned before but you have to wonder what the criteria for future Hall of Fame classes will be. I mean can you have a Hall of Fame player who stayed at your school for one maybe two years? If a player played at two or three other schools before coming to your school and then has a great last season is that someone you would want in your school's Hall of Fame? Will be interesting to see. Maybe the Hall of Fame becomes more of a recognition for a good season.

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, El Paso Eagle said:

I know this has been mentioned before but you have to wonder what the criteria for future Hall of Fame classes will be. I mean can you have a Hall of Fame player who stayed at your school for one maybe two years? If a player played at two or three other schools before coming to your school and then has a great last season is that someone you would want in your school's Hall of Fame? Will be interesting to see. Maybe the Hall of Fame becomes more of a recognition for a good season.

 

Right now, 3+ continuous years as a player or fan gets you HOF consideration.

  • Upvote 3
Posted
8 hours ago, El Paso Eagle said:

I know this has been mentioned before but you have to wonder what the criteria for future Hall of Fame classes will be. I mean can you have a Hall of Fame player who stayed at your school for one maybe two years? If a player played at two or three other schools before coming to your school and then has a great last season is that someone you would want in your school's Hall of Fame? Will be interesting to see. Maybe the Hall of Fame becomes more of a recognition for a good season.

 

Funny you posted this as I was thinking this earlier today.  I don’t see how you can possibly have new inductees into a HOF in a few years.  I have to believe many fans would join me in booing a Chandler Morris type player* who transferred in one year and out the next.  I don’t care if he passed for 6,000 yards and led us to CFB playoffs, I don’t think a fly by night player should be in the HOF.  

*choose your player.  I picked Chandler, but there are obviously many other options.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, NT93 said:

Funny you posted this as I was thinking this earlier today.  I don’t see how you can possibly have new inductees into a HOF in a few years.  I have to believe many fans would join me in booing a Chandler Morris type player* who transferred in one year and out the next.  I don’t care if he passed for 6,000 yards and led us to CFB playoffs, I don’t think a fly by night player should be in the HOF.  

*choose your player.  I picked Chandler, but there are obviously many other options.

I wouldn’t boo, but I wouldn’t cheer either. Silence speaks volumes. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, NT93 said:

Funny you posted this as I was thinking this earlier today.  I don’t see how you can possibly have new inductees into a HOF in a few years.  I have to believe many fans would join me in booing a Chandler Morris type player* who transferred in one year and out the next.  I don’t care if he passed for 6,000 yards and led us to CFB playoffs, I don’t think a fly by night player should be in the HOF.  

*choose your player.  I picked Chandler, but there are obviously many other options.

I guess NT will have no more HOF in major sports, because it is highly unlikely that any developing star is going to stay at NT.  Unless, you want to honor someone like Stone, who played very little but lasted 4 years.  

HOF membership in the future is most likely going to be players that only had one relatively great year before NT got outbid for their services.   Exception could be multiple year player that didn't really shine until their senior season.    

Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, UNTLifer said:

I wouldn’t boo, but I wouldn’t cheer either. Silence speaks volumes. 

I wouldn’t literally boo either…just expressing that I wouldn’t be in favor of someone like that being in the HOF.  I agree that silence would speak volumes (and it’d be much classier).

33 minutes ago, GrandGreen said:

HOF membership in the future is most likely going to be players that only had one relatively great year before NT got outbid for their services.   Exception could be multiple year player that didn't really shine until their senior season.    

I’d rather have no new members, though I’d be ok with the “exception.” I’d love to hear other opinions.

Edited by NT93
  • Upvote 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, NT93 said:

I wouldn’t literally boo either…just expressing that I wouldn’t be in favor of someone like that being in the HOF.  I agree that silence would speak volumes (and it’d be much classier).

I’d rather have no new members, though I’d be ok with the “exception.  I’d love to hear other opinions.

I rather NIL never happened, it is well on its way to destroying college sports.  I think eventually that fact will have to be recognized and some type of curtailment will occur.  Unfortunately, I am sure that most of us older fans won't be around to see it.  

  • Upvote 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, GrandGreen said:

I rather NIL never happened, it is well on its way to destroying college sports.  I think eventually that fact will have to be recognized and some type of curtailment will occur.  Unfortunately, I am sure that most of us older fans won't be around to see it.  

It's out of control as is, and getting worse.   Players already under NIL contracts are starting to test boundaries.  Withholding practicing until re-negotiations happen.  Accepting an NIL deal at a new school, practice, then accept another NIL deal at the previous school.

The things that makes the NFL somewhat balanced (draft, salary cap, binding contracts) are things that will prevent college football from being balanced now and in the future.   It's predicted (by Power program coaches) that even if player contracts happen and NIL regulated, that extra under-table payments will begin again.

Posted
2 hours ago, NT93 said:

I wouldn’t literally boo either…just expressing that I wouldn’t be in favor of someone like that being in the HOF.  I agree that silence would speak volumes (and it’d be much classier).

I’d rather have no new members, though I’d be ok with the “exception.” I’d love to hear other opinions.

How about 2 divisions...Hall of Fame for those at UNT at least 3 years with great careers and Hall of Honor for those less than 3 years with great seasons.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Zeleny' Orel said:

How about 2 divisions...Hall of Fame for those at UNT at least 3 years with great careers and Hall of Honor for those less than 3 years with great seasons.

nah

Posted
55 minutes ago, Zeleny' Orel said:

How about 2 divisions...Hall of Fame for those at UNT at least 3 years with great careers and Hall of Honor for those less than 3 years with great seasons.

Not a bad premise, and I could possibly be convinced with some tweaking, but my initial reaction is “no.”

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.