If we win out reg season we are in?

[Censored by Laurie]

as of 1/24, here are Lunardi's (who I hate) bubble teams and their resumes:

UNT - 15-4, 6-1 AAC, 46 NET, 0-3 Quad 1 games

Last 4 In - 
 - Pitt - 13-6, 4-4 ACC, 34 NET, 1-6 Quad 1 games
 - San Diego St. - 13-5, 6-3 MWC, 42 NET, 3-3 Quad 1 games
 - Ohio State - 11-8, 3-5 BIG, 29 NET, 3-6 Quad 1 games
 - Texas - 14-6, 3-6 SEC, 32 NET, 3-5 Quad 1 games

Last 8 Out - 
 - Nebraska - 12-8, 2-7 BIG, 63 NET, 1-6 Quad 1 games
 - Indiana - 14-7, 5-5 BIG, 68 NET, 2-7 Quad 1 games
 - Cincinnati - 12-7, 2-6 Big 12, 48 NET, 0-6 Quad 1 games
 - SMU - 15-5, 6-3 ACC, 44 NET, 0-4 Quad 1 games
 - VCU - 16-4, 6-1 A10, 45 NET, 0-1 Quad 1 games
 - Arizona St. - 11-8, 2-6 Big 12, 59 NET, 2-7 Quad 1 games
 - Xavier - 13-8, 5-5 Big East, 55 NET, 1-6 Quad 1 games
 - Wake Forrest - 15-5, 7-2 ACC, 71 NET, 1-5 Quad 1 games

it's pretty tough to make the argument that our resume is better than any of those Last 4 In as things stand...especially as all 4 will have more Quad 1 games throughout the rest of the year.  that said, I think we're pretty damn comparable with those next 8 schools. 

we'll almost certainly only have one more potential Quad 1 game...and that'd be a neutral site re-match with Memphis, which ideally is for the auto-bid. this just more and more underscores how we need to be doing so much more in our non-con scheduling. 

I'd say there's a path, but it's quite slim. this projection also only has one MVC and one A-10 program in...which seems ridiculous...and the path in get's even tighter should there be a few conference tourney upsets. 

keep winning, hope Memphis keeps winning as well and hopefully we're cutting nets in Ft. Worth and this whole conversation is moot 

[NorthTexasWeLove]

59 minutes ago, Censored by Laurie said:

as of 1/24, here are Lunardi's (who I hate) bubble teams and their resumes:

UNT - 15-4, 6-1 AAC, 46 NET, 0-3 Quad 1 games

Last 4 In - 
 - Pitt - 13-6, 4-4 ACC, 34 NET, 1-6 Quad 1 games
 - San Diego St. - 13-5, 6-3 MWC, 42 NET, 3-3 Quad 1 games
 - Ohio State - 11-8, 3-5 BIG, 29 NET, 3-6 Quad 1 games
 - Texas - 14-6, 3-6 SEC, 32 NET, 3-5 Quad 1 games

Last 8 Out - 
 - Nebraska - 12-8, 2-7 BIG, 63 NET, 1-6 Quad 1 games
 - Indiana - 14-7, 5-5 BIG, 68 NET, 2-7 Quad 1 games
 - Cincinnati - 12-7, 2-6 Big 12, 48 NET, 0-6 Quad 1 games
 - SMU - 15-5, 6-3 ACC, 44 NET, 0-4 Quad 1 games
 - VCU - 16-4, 6-1 A10, 45 NET, 0-1 Quad 1 games
 - Arizona St. - 11-8, 2-6 Big 12, 59 NET, 2-7 Quad 1 games
 - Xavier - 13-8, 5-5 Big East, 55 NET, 1-6 Quad 1 games
 - Wake Forrest - 15-5, 7-2 ACC, 71 NET, 1-5 Quad 1 games

it's pretty tough to make the argument that our resume is better than any of those Last 4 In as things stand...especially as all 4 will have more Quad 1 games throughout the rest of the year.  that said, I think we're pretty damn comparable with those next 8 schools. 

we'll almost certainly only have one more potential Quad 1 game...and that'd be a neutral site re-match with Memphis, which ideally is for the auto-bid. this just more and more underscores how we need to be doing so much more in our non-con scheduling. 

I'd say there's a path, but it's quite slim. this projection also only has one MVC and one A-10 program in...which seems ridiculous...and the path in get's even tighter should there be a few conference tourney upsets. 

keep winning, hope Memphis keeps winning as well and hopefully we're cutting nets in Ft. Worth and this whole conversation is moot 

Minnesota needs to keep winning and crack the t75. That will give us a Q1 win. We need UAB and FAU to crack 100. 

[greenminer]

Sometimes I speculate that Lunardi has some amount of influence over the picks, when of course he shouldn't.