Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nice recognition JonnyEagle .. teams really seem to be making a move.  Women and Men BBall teams.

I still scratch my head thinking back on the Highpoint and McNeese games.  Imagine if we had kept the lead in those games.  All things considered however, NT doing well.   Want to see more fans in the stands supporting them!

  • Upvote 3
Posted
56 minutes ago, Rock said:

Nice recognition JonnyEagle .. teams really seem to be making a move.  Women and Men BBall teams.

I still scratch my head thinking back on the Highpoint and McNeese games.  Imagine if we had kept the lead in those games.  All things considered however, NT doing well.   Want to see more fans in the stands supporting them!

Those were difficult games for UNT. It's similar when a high major goes on the road and plays a good mid major. Well, we were a mid-major going on the road and taking on good low majors. I don't like that scheduling much like high major fans hate going and playing true roadies at mid majors. It doesn't serve the greatest interest of UNT to go play those games. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Glory to the Green said:

We’re on the outside looking in right now, but there’s still a slim chance of an at large.  Need to keep winning..and convincing wins would serve us well.  GMG!

My 0.02: we would need to win out, losing only in the AAC Championship game to the Tigers.  And even then, our chances are not good.  The committee will dwell on our Q1 record.

any additional losses until then would effectively doom us unless we get the auto-bid.

Want to make things even hairier? We lose in the championship game to...someone other than Memphis. Because the Tigers lost in an earlier round.

The committee will almost certainly still give Memphis an at-large, which means we are hoping for a second at-large American bid.  OUTLOOK NOT GOOD.

Edited by greenminer
Posted (edited)

Follow up thoughts:

I think we are all aware of the many things that go into selection.  But many (or most) casuals think too much of W-L record.  As in, 25+ wins means you're a near lock for an AL.

Just another one of my 0.02 observations: the committee will have a handful of 25-ish-win mid-majors on the outside looking in (most years), and have to also consider all these 15-to-20-win-ish teams from the majors.  This is where Quad 1 opportunities come into play.

It's unfair, because quality midmajors like us sit on a s.t.ru.g.g.l.e.b.u.s. trying to schedule more Q1 opportunities, while those majors get tons of them just by virtue of being in their conference.  So, by sheer luck or chance or whatever,  they pull off 1 or 2 Q1 wins, and thus get the nod.

It's freakin hard being where we are, and getting over the hump.

Edited by greenminer
  • Upvote 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.