Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, GMG24 said:

Did you catch the first helmet was North Texas Script and the helmets later had the wings?

That's why they said, "Psyche!" when they went to the winged helmet.  "Couldn't script it any better" was a complete trolljob.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Mean Green 93-98 said:

That's why they said, "Psyche!" when they went to the winged helmet.  "Couldn't script it any better" was a complete trolljob.

I must have watched without the audio lol 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, NT80 said:

Oregon Ducks Football Uniforms 2021 2024 | ozogama.lt

It's Oregon.....not us.

The whole season without a whole SOW LOGO on our helmets!??

It's North Texas...not Oregon. As much as we might hate it we should get away from logo's since we can't seem to settle on one and just put Mean Green or North Texas on the helmet.

Edited by Hunter Green
  • RV 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Hunter Green said:

It's North Texas...not Oregon. As much as we might hate it we should get away from logo's since we can't seem to settle on one and just put Mean Green or North Texas on the helmet.

RV would love that.  He didn't think anyone would know who we are if we didn't spell it out on the helmet.

The whole point of a Logo is Branding.   A school name is not a logo.   Wings are not a logo.  School initials can be a logo, but that is just lazy.

  • Upvote 3
Posted
13 hours ago, NT80 said:

RV would love that.  He didn't think anyone would know who we are if we didn't spell it out on the helmet.

The whole point of a Logo is Branding.   A school name is not a logo.   Wings are not a logo.  School initials can be a logo, but that is just lazy.

I agree with you. The point I'm making is that we can't seem to decide on anything. I actually prefer the SOW and if they would shrink the image just a bit, it would fit nicely on the helmet. Why someone can't figure that out is beyond me.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hunter Green said:

I agree with you. The point I'm making is that we can't seem to decide on anything. I actually prefer the SOW and if they would shrink the image just a bit, it would fit nicely on the helmet. Why someone can't figure that out is beyond me.

Agree. 

We have the SOW on University buildings, all around campus, even in Frisco, but we can't put the whole thing on a helmet??

UNT cuts the ribbon on first permanent building at Frisco branch campus |  Frisco Enterprise | starlocalmedia.com

  • Upvote 2
Posted
2 hours ago, NT80 said:

Agree. 

We have the SOW on University buildings, all around campus, even in Frisco, but we can't put the whole thing on a helmet??

 

no, we can't.   because the full logo on the helmet looks like ass.   horrible fit.

 

put it on the state of texas, it fits.    eagle by itself, no.

  • Upvote 1
  • Lovely Take 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Green with Envy said:

no, we can't.   because the full logo on the helmet looks like ass.   horrible fit.

 The fit is something the equipment guys can easily fix.

The issue is the helmet chin strap end piece can sometimes overlap the eagle head on the logo.

The fix is to adjust the position of the full SOW forward and above the chin strap (as shown)...

or tilt it slightly back away from the chin strap.

IMG_4086.jpeg.5482afa4f0bec7ba816975bbd46da2ef.jpeg

 

IMG_4593.webp.63546ae2e03aba23db1165dc3ba44511.webp

Edited by NT80
  • Oh Boy! 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NT80 said:

 The fit is something the equipment guys can easily fix.

The issue is the helmet chin strap end piece can sometimes overlap the eagle head on the logo.

The fix is to adjust the position of the full SOW forward and above the chin strap (as shown)...

or tilt it slightly back away from the chin strap.

IMG_4086.jpeg.5482afa4f0bec7ba816975bbd46da2ef.jpeg

 

IMG_4593.webp.63546ae2e03aba23db1165dc3ba44511.webp

There is no way you can say the ‘new’ example you showed actually looks good.   

  • Haha 1
  • Oh Boy! 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Green with Envy said:

There is no way you can say the ‘new’ example you showed actually looks good.   

I think it looks fine.  Most of the Eagle is visible, it looks like it is attacking something with talons out....lol.

To me it's more interesting than just bland feathers.  Other fans are laughing at us.

  • Skeptical Eagle 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, NT80 said:

I think it looks fine.  Most of the Eagle is visible, it looks like it is attacking something with talons out....lol.

To me it's more interesting than just bland feathers.  Other fans are laughing at us.

Nobody is laughing. It’s fine if you don’t like it, but don’t make things up to sell your point. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Eye Roll 2
Posted
1 hour ago, NT80 said:

To me it's more interesting than just bland feathers.  Other fans are laughing at us.

Don't think it's bland at all.  I like it.  Friends like it.  Oregon liked theirs.  It's fine.

  • Puking Eagle 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.