Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, MeanGreen_MBA said:

Good article.

Quote

By that fall, the Boulevard Collective signed every football and basketball player to standard NIL deals of $36,000 annually, according to On3. The Ponies have the payroll working again, and this time it's all aboveboard.

I've mentioned this numerous times, but once again, exactly HOW does every player on that team deserve $36k for usage of their Name, Image, or Likeness? 

Other than his family and a few friends, there's not 5 people that know what the 3rd string left guard looks like or even what his name is and his name certainly isn't being used to garner profits for any other company.  I suspect there are no pictures of him available other than various roster images, etc. in which nobody is profiting from.

The ONLY place his name or likeness might show up is in NCAA FB video game, but that might has well use "player AA" instead of his name. EA Sports (or whoever) isn't making money due to this guy.

This seems like the kind of thing the smaller schools might could start going after.  Force the disclosure and accounting for how NIL money is being determined and spent.  Again, it's even more preposterous that an NIL value can be determined BEFORE a player has even appeared with the team, i.e. his Name, Image, or Likeness have generated $0 in revenue (with the exception of a few top players that generate marketing buzz).

  • Upvote 1
  • Oh Boy! 1
Posted

The reality is that money talks. They have it. We don’t. Our advantage is in enrollment and alumni, but they just don’t care about our teams, much less the university. We can’t compete with the money or the prestige of those power programs. 

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, untjim1995 said:

The reality is that money talks. They have it. We don’t. Our advantage is in enrollment and alumni, but they just don’t care about our teams, much less the university. We can’t compete with the money or the prestige of those power programs. 

Every article I read about SMU references how much these billionaires remember the good ole days of success and how motivated they were to find that again. There's a sense of care that obviously anyone who posts here has, but the general alumni seems.... less than enthused. 

I think there are plenty of alumni who talk fondly about our 4 straight NO Bowls (even though we went 1-3) but I feel like those 4 years don't quite move the needle like the Pony Express did. I fondly remember during my years beating OSU in basketball and the 2 NCAA berths, but most of my alumni friends excluding @Jason Howeth could have cared less.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

Also, I love this sentence:

In the '60s and early '70s, Hayden Fry had just three winning seasons in 11 years at SMU, going 49-66-1 before becoming a legend at Iowa.

Casually forgetting his 40-23 record with us including the last time we were ranked 😞

  • Upvote 2
  • Sad 1
  • Pissed 1
Posted
1 hour ago, meaniegreenie said:

I've mentioned this numerous times, but once again, exactly HOW does every player on that team deserve $36k for usage of their Name, Image, or Likeness? 

SMU was the first school to announce a pay-the-whole-roster deal. It let the world know that the Piggybank Express was open for business again and it fostered team cohesion. Those benefits seem worth paying even the bottom of the roster like an assistant manager at Subway.

I am surprised SMU had any fat cats left who cared about football success. The 1980s was a long time ago. But I guess what the Hard Line used to call the "cocaine and boob job crowd" in Dallas wants a winner.

  • Upvote 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted
1 hour ago, meaniegreenie said:

Good article.

I've mentioned this numerous times, but once again, exactly HOW does every player on that team deserve $36k for usage of their Name, Image, or Likeness? 

 

NIL is just a fake name for fake work payments.

Let's call it what it really is:   Bribery, or Pay for Play.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 hour ago, NT80 said:

NIL is just a fake name for fake work payments.

Let's call it what it really is:   Bribery, or Pay for Play.

You can't call it Pay for Play when they don't have to play to get paid.

NIL is an endorsement deal, like Walt Garrison making bank in those old Skoal tobacco ads. Except most of the time they don't even bother to make athletes do an ad. They just say "here's a big check for just being yourself."

  • Upvote 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Posted
5 hours ago, NT80 said:

NIL is just a fake name for fake work payments.

Let's call it what it really is:   Bribery, or Pay for Play.

Now it’s here to stay…it’s the future and only $$$ will let you into the club. Until the really powerful teams split off.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

So with SMU joining the ACC this season, no $ from the conference for what, like the next 7 years, or so? There must be a ton of $ being generating from CFP for the ACC…but not SMU…where is it all coming from? 

Posted
1 hour ago, greenjoe said:

Like it or not, the Hayden Fry story goes from SMU to Iowa.  He just stopped in Denton for gasoline.

I remember reading back then on the Internet that the real story was that he heading to Buc-ees but missed the exit and just kept on going.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.