Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, Big Z said:

And we hired Eric Morris, as a KC Keeler starter kit maybe?   Yeah, I won’t be going to games next year.  Maybe if Temple comes to DATCU next year I will make at exception.  I will be the one wearing the custom “KC was Available” shirt.  MANY fans here first guessed this hire and wanted Keeler here instead of Morris.  

  • Upvote 4
  • Eye Roll 2
  • Downvote 12
  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Meangreen Fight said:

And we hired Eric Morris, as a KC Keeler starter kit maybe?   Yeah, I won’t be going to games next year.  Maybe if Temple comes to DATCU next year I will make at exception.  I will be the one wearing the custom “KC was Available” shirt.  MANY fans here first guessed this hire and wanted Keeler here instead of Morris.  

What if we got his DC. You still crying?

  • Upvote 2
Posted

SHSU was 9-3.  Seven of their wins were against teams with non winning seasons.  Keeler was 2-3 against winning teams.  As I read the board, for man, those are the wins that count.

  • Upvote 7
Posted
3 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

This could be a death blow to that man’s career. Has Temple ever been good at football?

Temple was in the AAC championship against Herman and UH the year they had one loss then wiped the floor with FSU in the Peach Bowl.

  • Upvote 3
Posted

No wonder he was in tears after the game against Liberty on Friday and saying we're all family here and such.  Guess he'd rather play in an empty Philadelphia Eagles stadium than wait on the renovation of Bowers.  

Posted
4 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

This could be a death blow to that man’s career. Has Temple ever been good at football?

temple all time is 41.1 winning %

north Texas is 43.6%

so…you’re safe!

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, BBA1989 said:

No wonder he was in tears after the game against Liberty on Friday and saying we're all family here and such.  Guess he'd rather play in an empty Philadelphia Eagles stadium than wait on the renovation of Bowers.  

Lol.   Renovations of Bowers (if it happens) will be a $60M press box, some suites and club level, plus restroom and concession space updates.  No major seating addition to their 14,000 seat stadium.  

https://gobearkats.com/news/2024/8/1/football-bowers-stadium-redesign-plans-submitted-to-bor.aspx

https://gobearkats.com/facilities/bowers-stadium/22

front view

 

Bowers Stadium vs Hawaii 2024

Edited by NT80
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, NT80 said:

Not sure where you got your info. 

Thru the 2023 season:  The Mean Green have played 106 seasons of football, compiling a record of 530–527–33 (.501)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_North_Texas_Mean_Green_football_seasons

Happy to show you:

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/north-texas/index.html

Shame on me, because I know that our history goes back that far.  But my attempt to rib Lifer still stands 😉

PS: if you count those ties as part of the total, 530/1090 = 48.62%

Edited by greenminer
  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Meangreen Fight said:

And we hired Eric Morris, as a KC Keeler starter kit maybe?   Yeah, I won’t be going to games next year.  Maybe if Temple comes to DATCU next year I will make at exception.  I will be the one wearing the custom “KC was Available” shirt.  MANY fans here first guessed this hire and wanted Keeler here instead of Morris.  

Man hasn’t coached a single game at Temple and you’re already taking victory laps?

  • Upvote 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, greenminer said:

Happy to show you:

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/north-texas/index.html

Shame on me, because I know that our history goes back that far.  But my attempt to rib Lifer still stands 😉

Lol.

Seasons: 60 (1953 to 2024)

What that says is we won more in small college football conferences from 1913-1952.

Since moving up to major school football conferences from 1953-2024 (except for the demotion to 1-AA 1983-1995) as we moved up in Conference power, it has become more difficult to sustain winning. 

That is to be expected if you don't have the resources, donors, and support other major programs have.  Also, of course, coaching and recruiting has been unstable.   But still we have come a long way...into one of the Top 5 football conferences in the country! 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
7 hours ago, UNTLifer said:

This could be a death blow to that man’s career. Has Temple ever been good at football?

The exact same thing was probably thought by other fan bases about Eric, Seth, Dan, and any other head coach we’ve hired here.

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, NT80 said:

But still we have come a long way...into one of the Top 5 football conferences in the country! 

That is very subjective.  Boise State or UNLV probably will get the G5 spot in the playoff over a one loss Army team.  Louisville, SMU, Houston, Rutgers and Cincinnati left conference for greener pastures.  So I don’t know who anointed the AAC as 5th, but the playoff committee isn’t listening to them.  Army, a team brand new to the conference that came into the conference and dominated. They were independent juggernauts last year at 6-6 🙄.

AAC is viewed as better than the MAC, CUSA and Sun Belt.  But we certainly won’t be viewed as better than the reconstructed PAC 12 and right now it doesn’t look like we are viewed better than the current MWC. 

Edited by Meangreen Fight
Posted
4 hours ago, Meangreen Fight said:

That is very subjective.  Boise State or UNLV probably will get the G5 spot in the playoff over a one loss Army team.  Louisville, SMU, Houston, Rutgers and Cincinnati left conference for greener pastures.  So I don’t know who anointed the AAC as 5th, but the playoff committee isn’t listening to them.  Army, a team brand new to the conference that came into the conference and dominated. They were independent juggernauts last year at 6-6 🙄.

AAC is viewed as better than the MAC, CUSA and Sun Belt.  But we certainly won’t be viewed as better than the reconstructed PAC 12 and right now it doesn’t look like we are viewed better than the current MWC. 

I'm talking best G5 Conference as a whole.   

AAC had 8/14 teams with 6 or more wins.

MWC had 5/12 teams with 6 or more wins.

Plus, Boise is leaving the MWC to the G5 PAC, and UNLV is staying in the MWC...further diluting both.

Posted
1 hour ago, NT80 said:

I'm talking best G5 Conference as a whole.   

AAC had 8/14 teams with 6 or more wins.

MWC had 5/12 teams with 6 or more wins.

Plus, Boise is leaving the MWC to the G5 PAC, and UNLV is staying in the MWC...further diluting both.

Those wins numbers are meaningless until you factor out wins against FCS and lower*.  (I believe FBS can schedule a D2 team but I am unaware if a match up of FBS vs D2 occurred this season).  
 

I believe the new Pac 12 will be thought of as better than MWC leftovers.  And UNLV will eventually leave the MWC also.  And referencing 6 wins when by default you can schedule 2 (most only do 1 but still) virtually guaranteed wins against FCS and lower is just not an accurate way to assess a conference’s strength.  Head to Head in non-conference is the only way imo.  But perception when there are not that many games is the one that matters.  Because that is what will keep a 1 loss Army team out of the playoffs.  
 

Army’s blowout loss to Norte Dame looks worse than Boise’s to Oregon.  But they struggled more recently to beat a bad Wyoming team 17-13 while we blew them out 44-17.   Boise all had a close call to a bad Nevada team 28-21.  Both of these games were in November. 
 

Your perception is just as valid as anyone else’s but the majority of power brokers will still probably view AAC as behind the new Pac 12.  And it won’t even be close if the Pac gets UNLV while retaining everyone else they took from MWC.  

  • Eye Roll 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Meangreen Fight said:

Those wins numbers are meaningless until you factor out wins against FCS and lower*.  (I believe FBS can schedule a D2 team but I am unaware if a match up of FBS vs D2 occurred this season).  
 

I believe the new Pac 12 will be thought of as better than MWC leftovers.  And UNLV will eventually leave the MWC also.  And referencing 6 wins when by default you can schedule 2 (most only do 1 but still) virtually guaranteed wins against FCS and lower is just not an accurate way to assess a conference’s strength.  Head to Head in non-conference is the only way imo.  But perception when there are not that many games is the one that matters.  Because that is what will keep a 1 loss Army team out of the playoffs.  
 

Army’s blowout loss to Norte Dame looks worse than Boise’s to Oregon.  But they struggled more recently to beat a bad Wyoming team 17-13 while we blew them out 44-17.   Boise all had a close call to a bad Nevada team 28-21.  Both of these games were in November. 
 

Your perception is just as valid as anyone else’s but the majority of power brokers will still probably view AAC as behind the new Pac 12.  And it won’t even be close if the Pac gets UNLV while retaining everyone else they took from MWC.  

Its been a few months but from what I remember the UNLV athletic department was about $20 million in the hole and could not afford to buy out of the MWC. The MWC then threw that much at UNLV to keep them in the conference where they shall remain.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.