Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, NT93 said:

My problem with SL was that, as a general rule, we weren’t competitive against good teams.  Yes, we usually beat the bad teams which is great, but we got spanked most of the time when we played a good team.

Losses by 20+ points/total losses 

2016: 5/9

2017: 4/5

2018: 1/4

2019: 3/8

2020: 5/6

2021: 3/7

2022: 4/7

Under SL, 25 of our 46 losses (54%) were by 20+ points.  

Things under EM just don’t seem similar to that in my opinion.

image.png.0507ad3f6a0fb9fa1937ea52b4bd866b.png

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Eye Roll 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Big Z said:

image.png.0507ad3f6a0fb9fa1937ea52b4bd866b.png

So far EM has 3 of those in 19 games (15%).  So you think 15% and 54% are similar?  

Edited by NT93
  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Coffee and TV said:

Frustrating loss! Really felt like it was winnable through the 3rd quarter and then Memphis got smart and went back to the run. Still drinking the green flavorade this morning, Tulane almost shit the bed against Rice this weekend, we can get these guys at home. 

I love a guy who knows his history. It was never Kool-Aid. 

jim-jones-ill-drink-to-that.gif

  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, BigWillie said:

Bigger sample size with SL. This is still unknown.

True, but pick any 19 game stretch* of SL’s tenure and the ass-whipping % is much higher than EM.

*I say 19 game stretch because that’s how many games EM has coached here.

Posted

Great perspective. Hopefully there will be a terrific turn out this Saturday. The team deserves it. I'll be there!

 

About the list of available players -- I get that you were using an old depth chart (Lott, Spruiells, etc.) to illustrate a valid point. Evan Jackson and Taylor Starling played last night though. Evan wasn't out there after the first defensive series, so I assume he got injured again. Ugh. There have been so many injuries on offense this season. It has been difficult figuring out who is injured and who has been benched at times. I thought Zach Evans was hurt again until he was playing at the end of the Tulsa game. Braydon Nelson started at LT out of nowhere against Memphis, but Larry Moore was on the PAT team. Eric must have been shuffling the line again. I'll just keep guessing.

Posted
13 hours ago, KingDL1 said:

I think Eric will fix the defense this off-season. He really wants to win. 

Wasn't he supposed to do that last off-season?

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, keith said:

Wasn't he supposed to do that last off-season?

I think we got some defense transfers, but preseason injuries took off the DL depth. Also, we needed to restock on offense. We got picked clean on that side. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
12 hours ago, NT93 said:

True, but pick any 19 game stretch* of SL’s tenure and the ass-whipping % is much higher than EM.

*I say 19 game stretch because that’s how many games EM has coached here.

Losses are losses and Morris has never beaten a team with a winning record.

  • Upvote 2
  • Confused 1
  • Eye Roll 1
  • Puking Eagle 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Mean Green 93-98 said:

In other words, "Losses are losses, but wins are not necessarily wins"?

I was replying mostly to his original point:

”My problem with SL was that, as a general rule, we weren’t competitive against good teams.  Yes, we usually beat the bad teams which is great, but we got spanked most of the time when we played a good team.”

I was pointing out that we are still losing all the most meaningful games, even if my somewhat less. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, keith said:

Wasn't he supposed to do that last off-season?

I want everything at once, too. NIL changed the World going into this season. We had low funds, and Eric was initially set up for high school recruiting—we had preseason injuries. Plus, everyone says Caponi is on a two-year contract. It is only money.

I sure as heck would not want to be a head coach in this environment. 

  • Upvote 4
Posted
1 hour ago, 97and03 said:

Losses are losses and Morris has never beaten a team with a winning record.

Yes and no.  Of course a loss is a loss if you’re talking about conference standings, etc., but losing by 8 when you were a 12 point underdog is way better than losing by 28 when you were a 12 point underdog in my opinion.  There were a lot of “I’m embarrassed to wear a UNT shirt” moments with SL, not so much with EM.  Maybe I’m alone on an island, but I’d rather be competitive than get blown out.

  • Upvote 1
  • Eye Roll 1
Posted
On 10/21/2024 at 11:37 AM, 97and03 said:

Losses are losses and Morris has never beaten a team with a winning record.

SFA would like a word with you.

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.