Jump to content

Proposed College Student Football League to prevent the "implosion of FBS"


C Rod

Recommended Posts

On 10/1/2024 at 4:24 PM, kj86 said:

Agree, but it clearly says "without relegation".  Not sure how promotion without relegation works.

A similar 2-league proposal was leaked to the public this past spring and it resembles what is being proposed for the College Student Football League. I've attached the pdf deck if anyone's interested. It calls for a Super League (SL) of 70 permeant schools and an Under League (UL) of 66 schools that would be subject to promotion and relegation based upon performance. If you just want the bullet points, see the attached screen grabs. 

Personally I think a system like this makes a lot of sense and halts the Big10/SEC breakaway. Not surprisingly, the Big10 and SEC came out against this proposal when it hit the streets last February. 

And here come the downvotes and puking eagles in 3...2...1...

Screenshot 2024-10-03 at 10.25.47 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-10-03 at 10.26.47 AM.png

Turnkey-Super-League-pitch-deck.pdf

Edited by C Rod
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • C Rod changed the title to Proposed College Student Football League to prevent the "implosion of FBS"
11 minutes ago, Rudy said:

LOL, did you see half of those "schools" in the Power 12 league?  What a fkin joke.  No way that is serious.

No doubt this faces an uphill battle but the proposal takes the majority of schools from the previous Power 5 and reorganizes them into 12 divisions to prevent the SEC & Big10 from creating a 32 team super league.

Then it creates the Group of 8 (out of the G5 schools) with 8 division | 8 teams per division, which would have the opportunity for promotion/relegation to the top league, depending on performance.

I think it's a smart idea. The proposal also adds an additional game to the college football season and increases the CFP to 24 teams for more opportunity. 

Edited by C Rod
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SEC commissioner already said they aren't going backwards, which the B1G completely agrees with, too.

I think the reality is that these two will pick apart the pieces of the ACC and Big 12 that are worth something to them and they will abandon the NCAA. Best thing that could ever happen, too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, untjim1995 said:

The SEC commissioner already said they aren't going backwards, which the B1G completely agrees with, too.

I think the reality is that these two will pick apart the pieces of the ACC and Big 12 that are worth something to them and they will abandon the NCAA. Best thing that could ever happen, too. 

The Super Conference will just be the next new name and new rules for the top division, like there has always been...

Big school & Small school, 1-A & 1-AA, FBS & FCS, P5 & G5, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why the down votes?  This spreads top football (and money and competitiveness) out beyond just SEC and B10, and adds a promotion pathway for everyone to move up.  It's 1000x better than where we are currently heading. 

 

 

Screenshot_20241001_142908_On3.jpg

Edited by DentonStang
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Please review our full Privacy Policy before using our site.